I wasn’t ever a member of Match. So what about those of us that had everything turn to toast so badly that we had to replace all our music from a backup, not just the .itl file? And weren't ever a member of Match? Will it fix it for us?
But why? What's wrong with iTunes. I use it on my 2011 iMac and it runs fine, runs fast. I don't click on the buttons for features I don't use like podcasts, audiobooks, in fact I've got everything I don't need hidden.Man it's so funny how years ago, the whole iPod + iTunes situation was considered a match in heaven. Now... iTunes is a bloated piece of crap that tries to do everything. I'm really hoping Apple will soon decentralize the whole thing, make Music separate from sync'ing, etc.
Photos is simpler, I do miss iPhoto and all the new photos I put in (from my real camera) get organised into an album/event. I don't really see what they've removed from iTunes though. It seems pretty good to me!Been an Apple fan for a long time, but I really don't like the latest iTunes and Photo's applications. My wife and I both think they've taken-out simplicity and that applications are just confusing.
There is really no perfect solution for this. iTunes Match relies on acoustic fingerprinting to identify songs. This uses heuristic algorithms, so they will not be 100% perfect. In my experience mismatches are quite rare though.I've been eager to subscribe to Match since it was first announced. However, on this forum I keep reading about so many problems. Until I am confident Apple fixes all of these issues, I will not risk my digital music collection.
- Matching clean version of a song when original was the explicit version
- Matching non-album version of a song (from a compilation, greatest hits, single, etc) when the entire original album is owned
Don't know why you would expect your files to always be matched to that particular version of a song. It should match it to the version that is closest to your file. If that happens to be a different version than the MfI one, I see no problem with that.- Matching non mastered-for-itunes version of a song when the mastered-for-itunes version is available in the itunes store
I've been a Match subscriber for several years and never had any of these issues. The only issues I had were that occasionally album artwork didn't show up on the mobile devices (or took very long to do so), and I've had 2 or 3 songs (out of over 10,000) that were stuck in "waiting" mode for a long time (i.e. not matched or uploaded). Otherwise, it has worked very well for me.- Putting wrong album artwork on a song
- Wrong song plays when selected from a playlist
- Playlists don't sync, or incorrectly sync, across devices
- Song metadata gets messed up (playcounts, ratings, last date played, etc)
I hope so. I use Apple Music through iOS 95% of the time, and it's buggy as hell. Playlist sharing doesn't work anymore on iOS, going to the artist page on the iPad kills the Music app reproducibly every single time, "Add to Playlist" on songs not in "My Music" yet is a hit-and-miss affair, songs that have been made available offline twice (through a playlist, then directly) can't be removed from "My Music" without some major surgery, the touch targets at the bottom of the iPad Music app are messed up, etc.
But in no case will you "risk your digital music collection", because iTunes Match does not touch your original library unless you delete and re-download the songs yourself.
Mind you, I'm talking about iTunes Match, not Apple Music. In Apple Music, they seem to use a different matching algorithm that takes metadata into account, and there have also been bugs that resulted in corruption of the local library for some people (let's hope the iTunes update has fixed them).
Do you still pay for Match?
If you pay for Match and you upload your own music files, you will (well, should, looks like there were a few bugs) be able to get them back in not-DRM form if downloaded again. However, if you stop paying for Match, your tracks in Apple Music will be converted with DRM if you attempt to download them again, which means you'll lose those songs (and those gathered through the service) if you stop paying for Apple Music.
In a nutshell:
Match keeps your own files (or 'matched and downloaded') that have no DRM as your own while in the cloud.
Apple Music will DRM all files funneled through the cloud, but will not retroactively DRM your owned files (unless deleted and redownloaded).
It's now under View, and its called All Music or Music Only Available OfflineAnyone have a problem with 12.2 not showing "cloud" purchases in music or movies? There's no longer a checkbox for this in Preferences->Store
Yes. Again, I was only talking about Match. If you have subscribed to Music you should be careful and make a backup of your music (but you should do that anyway, since neither Match nor Music are backup services).But don't you have to have iCloud Music Library turned on to use Match (in the current version of iTunes), putting you at risk for the iCML/AM bugs where iCML changes your metadata or confuses your owned music with AM music?
Man it's so funny how years ago, the whole iPod + iTunes situation was considered a match in heaven. Now... iTunes is a bloated piece of crap that tries to do everything. I'm really hoping Apple will soon decentralize the whole thing, make Music separate from sync'ing, etc.
There is really no perfect solution for this. iTunes Match relies on acoustic fingerprinting to identify songs. This uses heuristic algorithms, so they will not be 100% perfect. In my experience mismatches are quite rare though.
But in no case will you "risk your digital music collection", because iTunes Match does not touch your original library unless you delete and re-download the songs yourself.
Mind you, I'm talking about iTunes Match, not Apple Music. In Apple Music, they seem to use a different matching algorithm that takes metadata into account, and there have also been bugs that resulted in corruption of the local library for some people (let's hope the iTunes update has fixed them).
Don't know why you would expect your files to always be matched to that particular version of a song. It should match it to the version that is closest to your file. If that happens to be a different version than the MfI one, I see no problem with that.
I've been a Match subscriber for several years and never had any of these issues. The only issues I had were that occasionally album artwork didn't show up on the mobile devices (or took very long to do so), and I've had 2 or 3 songs (out of over 10,000) that were stuck in "waiting" mode for a long time (i.e. not matched or uploaded). Otherwise, it has worked very well for me.
Current count is over 10,000 songs. If you consider that small, more power to you. I have seen maybe a handful of mismatches.1.- Mismatches are actually quite common, you must not have a large library.
Agree with (a). (b) is unnecessary.3.- You could solve this with 2 buttons. a) Force Upload and b) Match to different version. That easily.
OT I guess, but my mac still opens iPhoto when I connect my camera, and I have to tell it to open Photo instead.Photos is simpler, I do miss iPhoto and all the new photos I put in (from my real camera) get organised into an album/event. I don't really see what they've removed from iTunes though. It seems pretty good to me!
(I would love iPhoto to continue being updated and support iCloud photos)
Current count is over 10,000 songs. If you consider that small, more power to you. I have seen maybe a handful of mismatches.
Agree with (a). (b) is unnecessary.
Same here. Very annoying - no song is matched, instead now i got duplicates of every matchable song as "Apple Music" available for download. This is hilarious.Just did this update - it's fixed NOTHING!
This is me also. I guess we'll either have to try it or wait for others to do so. Apple probably hasn't even tested our use case.
But why? If you can force it to upload your original instead of matching, you get exactly the version from your own library on your mobile devices. Why would I want to force it to match something else in the store?I have Eric Clapton's One More Car, One More Rider live album from 2001. The first CD has 10 songs... Only 4 out of 10 songs are actually matched to the actual album... The rest of the songs come from greatest hits CD's and other compilations... Whilst 95% of the people wouldn't care, the remaining 5% that want to have a correctly matched library to the correct version of the actual album would. Why? Because of different mastering, different start and ending times, different volume, etc. IMO a "match to different version" button is completely necessary.