Still doesn't fix the fact that in order to add a song to a playlist, I have to go into either the album or curated playlist, and then click the dots to add it. Annoying.
But why? If you can force it to upload your original instead of matching, you get exactly the version from your own library on your mobile devices. Why would I want to force it to match something else in the store?
Still doesn't fix the fact that in order to add a song to a playlist, I have to go into either the album or curated playlist, and then click the dots to add it. Annoying.
This is exactly what I am worried about. I have 16000 songs that are matched/uploaded. I deleted all songs from my mac. Some songs are backed up, not all. So if I download a pearl jam record that I own today with Apple Music, then when my Apple music expires, then can I again download that same album without DRM? I plan on keeping match, but not Apple Music. Thank you.
But if you already converted your old purchase that were with DRM to none DRM version than you should be okay to sign up to Apple Music and cancel iTunes Match because even though Apple Music changes you purchased Music back to DRM does not mean after I cancel my purchases will not be available to download back from iTunes Store.
In any case make a Time Machine back up or a back up before you cancel iTunes Match but I am pretty sure if you are using the same account you purchased you music under that should also help things out.
You can set that as the default option. But I was just looking to "rip off the plaster" as it were, you can't update your Photos library with changes made in iPhoto. Considering this is where Apple is forcing us to go if we want to use iCloud photos I figured I might as well get used to it.OT I guess, but my mac still opens iPhoto when I connect my camera, and I have to tell it to open Photo instead.
Does this fix the issue of transferring my music from iTunes to my phone with out getting the error message that I have iTunes Match. Because I have that turned off and still can't put song on my phone?? Some one please let me know or email me a solution.
What I mean is that before Apple Music I subscribed to iTunes Match. Whenever I added music to my library from a CD iTunes would either match it or upload it. Apple basically gave me a copy to keep forever. If I do this process with Apple Music it doesn't quite work the same. My understandng is the matched music will disappear if I cancel Apple Music subsription, therefore losing songs that I, in fact, own, not rent.
There is really no perfect solution for this. iTunes Match relies on acoustic fingerprinting to identify songs. This uses heuristic algorithms, so they will not be 100% perfect. In my experience mismatches are quite rare though.
But in no case will you "risk your digital music collection", because iTunes Match does not touch your original library unless you delete and re-download the songs yourself.
Mind you, I'm talking about iTunes Match, not Apple Music. In Apple Music, they seem to use a different matching algorithm that takes metadata into account, and there have also been bugs that resulted in corruption of the local library for some people (let's hope the iTunes update has fixed them).
Don't know why you would expect your files to always be matched to that particular version of a song. It should match it to the version that is closest to your file. If that happens to be a different version than the MfI one, I see no problem with that.
I've been a Match subscriber for several years and never had any of these issues. The only issues I had were that occasionally album artwork didn't show up on the mobile devices (or took very long to do so), and I've had 2 or 3 songs (out of over 10,000) that were stuck in "waiting" mode for a long time (i.e. not matched or uploaded). Otherwise, it has worked very well for me.
That's all under the assumption that MfI versions are always better than the other versions. But that's not true. MfI versions of older music usually use new "remasterings" as source. The problem is that the studios often succumb to the "loudness war" when remastering catalog music and use too much dynamic range compression. In my experience rips from older CDs often sound better than the MfI versions.Is for the MfI songs - Apple promotes Match by saying it's a way to "upgrade" "lower quality" MP3s, and that one's music will sound better for it. To sometimes directly say all that, and other times imply it, it seems disingenuous to then not match the MfI songs, especially since if they're available and the non-MfI songs are not even sold on iTunes.
For me this release is presenting a new bug and more severe bug
Whenever I stream any radio station (Beats 1 or something else) my airplay is being stopped and iTunes switches over to my computer as an output device. The airplay icon is than gone aswell and I have restart iTunes to let it reappear again. Itunes Music content is behaving just normal.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204963It says: "Provides a way to correct a library problem affecting former iTunes Match subscribers."
And that is?
Did it fix it so iPad folders (in the iOS 9 beta) can be organized?
(Probably not, since it's beta...)
Gary
Thanks for giving me an update on the status, it is good to hear the issues are rare.
One of the purposes I had envisioned for iTunes Match for myself is to upgrade my older 128kbps MP3s, which I ripped from CDs I purchased that were stolen (along with my car they were in) a few years ago and thus I cannot re-rip. The gray area IP rights issue aside, Apple basically advertised iTunes Match for what seemed like this very purpose, among others.
To this end, I expect it to match the correct album where the song came from. I fully understand the technical reason for why it isn't always correct, but this is an engineering problem that is solvable, without having to rely on metadata (ex. if user matches 9/10 songs from a particular album, and song #10 matches to either the album copy, the greatest hits copy, or the compilation copy, odds are it's the album copy; or if a particular song matches either the album copy, the greatest hits copy, or the compilation copy, and 12 other matched songs are also on this compilation, odds are it's the complication copy that is needed; etc.). Thus, I do hope to use Match to "replace" my existing collection.
As for the MfI songs - Apple promotes Match by saying it's a way to "upgrade" "lower quality" MP3s, and that one's music will sound better for it. To sometimes directly say all that, and other times imply it, it seems disingenuous to then not match the MfI songs, especially since if they're available and the non-MfI songs are not even sold on iTunes.
Maybe my expectations are too high. I would easily pay double what Apple charges, if the above concerns were addressed.
This is a strange statement. The primary goal of Match is to make *your* library available on all your devices, not to replace it. Why would I want to "unify" my carefully ripped and otherwise acquired music to iTunes versions?You are right, to me the whole point of Match is to completely replace your library with iTunes files, and unify all of the songs you had before.
A "force upload" option would be nice, similar to what Google Music provides. Still don't see the point of option b).The solution would be simple. a) Add a "Force Upload" button and b) Add a "Match to different version" button. The issues can be resolved if Apple provided those options.