Do you guys think the 2.2 MHZ 15.4 with 128mb VC will run World Of Warcraft with any problems?
Absolutely. WoW isn't that demanding a game; heck, my old Sony Vaio S360 with a 64MB Mobility Radeon 9700 could even play WoW smoothly.
The 8600M GT, even with only 128MB of VRAM, should have absolutely no problem with WoW.
Put Ubuntu on your MBP too; that way you can use wine to run any Windows applications you'd need, without actually having to pay for Windows. And you can always get Parallels and run Ubuntu in a window on your OS X desktop if you really wanted to. With the change to nVidia cards, Linux support just got a huge boost.
Absolutely. WoW isn't that demanding a game; heck, my old Sony Vaio S360 with a 64MB Mobility Radeon 9700 could even play WoW smoothly.
The 8600M GT, even with only 128MB of VRAM, should have absolutely no problem with WoW.
How about on the 17"MBP with the 1900 x 1200 High Res Display? Anyone think this is a No No for 3d gaming? I'm no mad gam3r but will indulge here and there, nothing major Doom3, BF1942, Civ3 etc..
Do you really want two computers?
I'm pretty close to affording it. I just hate having to keep both synchronized. Then there's the video card issue with the MacBook. I see 15.4" as being huge as it is. I'm not terribly concerned with drive space on a laptop. After thinking about it, I'm terrified about damaging an Apple laptop. I see so many PowerBooks and MacBook Pros with dents. It almost makes it pointless to take it out of the house.If you can afford it - by all means.
There's redundancy - if one of them is in the shop, you can still use the other.
There's backup (another form of redundancy) - if you keep your files sync'd across both, when a disk fails or if the laptop is stolen you still have all of your files.
There's performance - laptop drives are *awful* compared to what's available for desktops and external drives, and desktops can have much larger and more useful screens. To me, laptops are about portability, and a 17" laptop would only be interesting to me if it were waterproof and heatproof so that it could double as a surfboard and an ironing board. As a computer, it's just too big to even consider;.
Did you upgrade to 7200 RPM?what's everyone's order ship date looking like... i ordered mine this afternoon and it says it won't ship till jul 18th~!!!! wtf?
I was wondering the same thing about rpm speeds. I don't know much about them at all, I am going to the Minneapolis College of Art and Design and currently have a MacBook with a 100GB hard drive that has only 10 GB left. so, should I go with the 200GB at 4200rpm or the 160GB at 5400rpm. I need space, I will only be accumliating more and more photos, music and videos at college. Just wondering what the speed difference really is.
What I don't get is (at least according to the apple website) even though the machine has an 800mhz bus it still has 667mhz ram.
Why does it have an 800 FSB but only 667 memory?
http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/specs.html
And only 2 USB?
My disk results were quite low (26.97) on my 2.4 MBP, and I'm not sure why. Perhaps Spotlight was indexing the drive? I had just completed the Migration Assistant. I'll run again later and see if my results change.Weird my 2.33 with 3gb of ram had these results
(snip)
Disk Test 38.19
Santa Rosa was a code name used by Intel. It's not going to say it anywhere on Apple's site. You can tell by the 800Mhz frontside bus as well as the chip speeds...both of which are only available on the Santa Rosa platform.
[edit] Oh, and it supports 4 gigs of RAM which only Santa Rosa can do since it's now a true 64 bit motherboard.
Yeah, but ask just about anyone here, and they'll suggest either VLC or MPlayer.![]()
FJR1300, Santa Rosa really isn't a marketing term, and looking at Apple's website, you can see why the wouldn't use it. But the 800MHz Front side bus coupled with the 2.2 and 2.4 GHz processors, coupled with the new max RAM of 4GB are all results of the new chipset (Santa Rosa)
Since the FSB is 800 MHz, do you think that the new line can handle the DDR2-800 memory? If so, why not take the default memory and buy 4 GB of it from crucial?
...Santa Rosa (Platform) doesn't do 800 on memory (without overclocking which I have never seen done on EFI). It will fall back to the 667 speed. The next refresh from Intel will either go with that speed or go DDR-3.