Well maybe you will be a happy camper once the iPhone is out huh?
Probably... (said with my tail tug between my legs)
Well maybe you will be a happy camper once the iPhone is out huh?
Wolfpup thank you for your well thought out and calm posting. I happen to agree with a number of your points.
I think the main disappointment from this upgrade is peoples expectations of what it was going to be. I for one expected SR and the improved onboard graphics. However i did expect that to come AFTER a MBP upgrade in June. I think if this upgrade is a small temporary one till last until maybe August or October then fair enough, If its to last another 6 months......well that takes the ****.
MRTEKKID. I have to say i have been pretty disgusted by some of your posts and the way you have spoken to some members of this forum! Whilst i respect your point of view there are better and more civilised ways of getting your point across.
I don't really see your point at all, you NEED 1GB RAM to run more than about 2-3 applications at once, on the MB.
I don't see the big deal about a DVD Burner nowdays, it's not easy to burn a DVD to watch on a TV using one without buying expensive Dual Layer disks or having a lot of technical know-how, also they are too small for sensible data backup especially when you can get a 300GB USB Hard Drive for $100 you might as well use that.
If you want to burn your girlfriend a CD, you can do that with the base model, so I don't see why it's a big deal.
Do I care about SR? Not a bit as it only adds additional costs with no noticeable benefit for me.
If a $300 piece of hardware [TV] can have a low-end GPU, then a $1500 piece of hardware should at LEAST have that same low-end GPU.
Rubbish.
Rubbish.
Definately COMPLETE rubbish.
My PB G4 is faster than my current Intel system at quite a few things, and comparing photoshop performance to a top of the line P4 system I use running Windows, it is much much faster.
If your iBook is better/faster than the new MacBooks, regardless of the graphic card, good for you, but you are obviously wrong.
um, my imac actually sped up when i put tiger on it.
it's faster now than it ever was under os 9, which is what it shipped with.
yes, 256mb of ram is nothing.
but that shows you how efficiently these computers run.
i've kept this mac out of necessity, but when i'm finished with it, my brother is going to be using it to write his thesis.
most people with macs that i know of either sell them or give them away when they're done with them, because they just don't die. (well, they do eventually)
my new imac (assuming they keep the 24" in the lineup when they update them) will be my combined computer/television for the next 4 or 5 years.
obscelescence comes on a mac far, far slower than a pc. which is why a mac's specifications are not nearly the whole story.
btw, every benchmark i've ever seen shows os x as outperfoming windows on the same hardware, and has for years. a lot of benchmarks that i'm aware of show mac os x outperforming windows when windows is on better hardware!
certainly, until the cs2/intel debacle (which has been fixed with cs3 anyhow), all the adobe apps perfomed waay better on the mac. that's why about 80% of the design industry use them.
I don't see the big deal about a DVD Burner nowdays, it's not easy to burn a DVD to watch on a TV using one without buying expensive Dual Layer disks or having a lot of technical know-how
Arrogance is the number one killer of companies.
Wolfpup thank you for your well thought out and calm posting. I happen to agree with a number of your points.
I'll repeat this one time, then I'm out of here: NO, Santa Rosa is NOT competing with MacBook. Brand-name SR laptops are currently priced above $1500. All the cheaper laptops you see out there are using chipsets equal to the one in MacBook, or more likely even older and weaker.
I don't understand people who play games on laptops anymore, if you want to play CoH, Prey, FEAR, BFME2 you buy a desktop, my powerbook is for work, my PC desktop is for pleasure, honestly I don't these games will be running like race horses on a MB.
OMG I can't play the newest games on my $1099 laptop, oh maybe I should just build a desktop for $1099 to play games on....![]()
We have different views on "efficient". OSX is too painful to use on 512mb of ram. It would be completely unusable with 256mb. You are just used to that and have accepted it somehow so you don't know the difference. For me, iphoto is completely unusable on the Mac Mini. It's just way too damn slow.
And I am an enthusiast. I game on my PC. I want cutting edge. I want power. I build my own systems and I keep them up to date.
And it is true that on the Intel Macs that XP does indeed outperform OSX across the board. There was quite a bit of discussion about it. I'm surprised you don't remember that.
Why are Apple making the MB so processor powerful while making so pathetic in terms of it's GPU?
I don't understand people who play games on laptops anymore, if you want to play CoH, Prey, FEAR, BFME2 you buy a desktop, my powerbook is for work, my PC desktop is for pleasure, honestly I don't these games will be running like race horses on a MB.
OMG I can't play the newest games on my $1099 laptop, oh maybe I should just build a desktop for $1099 to play games on....![]()
I guess they figure that with a 13" screen you won't be buying a MB for games or Aperture. Those are the only things that might want a more powerful graphic chip.
Uhh... You ever heard of a little application suite called FINAL CUT STUDIO??? The ONLY reason I don't buy a MacBook is because it can NOT run Final Cut Studio. That one little reason forces me to spend almost $2,000.00 more.