thequicksilver said:Compare like for like. The $1999 US model is £1429, which translates to $2520.68. Seems ridiculous. Then consider that the US price is without sales tax, so let's remove our equivalent, the whopping 17.5% VAT.
Then we have £1216.17, or $2145.24. It's about $150 over the top, more than I'd like but it's been worse in the past.
If you want to blame anyone for the huge difference in price, blame Gordon Brown
Randall said:MacBook Pro
15.4 inches (diagonal) 1440 by 900 digital display.
PowerBook G4 15"
15.2 inches (diagonal) 1440 by 960 digital display.
Sorry. I wonder why the 60 pixels are gone?
Lacero said:First thing a hacker is going to do is try installing Windows XP on the MBP. We'll see the extent of Apple's TPM protection mechanism. Any chance they only released this one model to gauge how effect their hardware locks are?
I hope so. Would keep me from having to upgrade my old Pentium 150Mhz. I could see this beneficial for my web design work, so I can test browser compatibility with my web sites. Dual boot or windowed mode would just be awesome!jcrewleif said:Will the new imac and macbookpro be able to run Windows xp?
Music_Producer said:Firewire will be dead.. it sucks for the real pro users.. firewire drives run at what? 7200 rpm? Thats utter crap! We need atleast 10,000 rpm or 15,000 rpm drives. I was amazed that instead of a PC card, they included a Express /34 card.. fantastic! That's preparing for the future.. I'll be the first one to buy a Express /34 SCSI adapter so I can use my scsi drives with the macbook.
BRLawyer said:I can only agree with EVERYTHING you said above...how many ****ING RETARDS we have here? Drop this forum, whiners!
Apple has already said they won't take measures to prevent people from installing Windows XP on an Intel-based Mac. The h/w protection is there to prevent people from install Mac OS X on a PC laptop from another manufacturer.Lacero said:First thing a hacker is going to do is try installing Windows XP on the MBP. We'll see the extent of Apple's TPM protection mechanism. Any chance they only released this one model to gauge how effect their hardware locks are?
Diatribe said:That basically shows that Apple is waaay overpriced.
BRLawyer said:I can only agree with EVERYTHING you said above...how many ****ING RETARDS we have here? Drop this forum, whiners!
Modem - how many of you still use it? how many hotels still use it? BUZZ OFF!
FW800 - the market adoption is close to ZERO, and FW400 is still THERE! Besides, as many people already said, the best solution for FW is DAISY-CHAIN!
Lower Resolution - YOU LOST 300 PIXELS AND GOT A LOT MORE BRIGHTNESS, DAMNED! WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? YOU ALWAYS COMPLAINED ABOUT "XBrite", so what now?
DL RW - DL discs ARE expensive and hard to find...NO NEED FOR THAT right now!
ALL OTHER PERKS are there with a good price, and there is NOTHING to complain about, NOTABLY speed and battery, thinner design, backlit keyboard, sudden motion sensor and everything ELSE! GET REAL!
And concerning the Acer "dude", go get it roger! Acer sucks for laptops, and it also includes Windows XP for ya! Apple is, above all, ABOUT SOFTWARE!
SJ, congrats for another GREAT keynote! GO APPLE!
Lacero said:I hope so. Would keep me from having to upgrade my old Pentium 150Mhz. I could see this beneficial for my web design work, so I can test browser compatibility with my web sites. Dual boot or windowed mode would just be awesome!QUOTE]
Yes, dual boot would indeed be nice - I use my PC for such limited things nowadays it would really be nice to just get rid of it and have one machine. I'd primarily run OS X on it of course, but for those few times I need a PC dual boot would come in soooo handy.![]()
Unregistered. said:This is NOT the fastest notebook ever, and I am amazed that everybody is quoting that sales pitch as if it were gospel. It would take about a 30-second Google search to find faster laptops from VoodooPC or Alienware or Falcon Northwest or HP, not to mention the other Yonah laptops that other companies have already released at higher clockspeeds than the new "Macbook"! The Macbook seems to max out at 1.83GHz (looking on Apple's website), while the ThinkPad T60 goes to 2.13GHz, and various Asus models go to 2GHz DualCore Yonah.
HOW can everybody be this gullible? I admit that Apple makes great gear - I have a PowerBook, an iPod Nano, and a Mac Mini and love them - but this is an outright LIE. Stop quoting it without thinking. You're doing yourselves a disservice by being gullible and unwise shoppers. It's the fastest Mac Laptop ever, but Jobs should believe in his product enough not to have to lie to sell it. They will sell themselves.
Ten Seconds it took:
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2702
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2711
And I'm not even going to try to explain Rosetta's speed hit to you people, since 90% of you don't want to hear it anyway.
I can't believe that I'm the voice of frickin' reason around here.
sw1tcher said:Sad that we still have to pay Apple's premium. I thought (like almost everyone) that the switch over to Intel would bring slightly lower prices.
iSee said:Wow! Well, if you can afford to buy that many songs, you can probably afford an ExpressCard FW800 port for your Macbook. Let's see, at 4MB per song, that around $75,000 in music!
And with 300GB of music to carry around, you're going to need one of those 8 lb. iPods![]()
Will Cheyney said:Notice how the new laptop is called a 'MacBook' instead of a PowerBook? Could the be some 'pro' versions in the pipeline?
Like that will stop them...weldon said:Apple has already said they won't take measures to prevent people from installing Windows XP on an Intel-based Mac. The h/w protection is there to prevent people from install Mac OS X on a PC laptop from another manufacturer.
nxent said:this is exactly why you wait until rev 2. i've got another year on my powerbook G4 so that's when i'm shooting for. hopefully they'll really have something that raises hell(not that this doesn't) by then. now that i think of it, it's possible apple 'left' features off the intel probook for the sole purpose of maintaining the sellability of the powerbooks (fw800, dual layer dvd burner, etc). which kinda makes sense...
The quote (according to MacInTouch) was actually "the fastest Mac notebook ever". Feel silly now?Unregistered. said:This is NOT the fastest notebook ever, and I am amazed that everybody is quoting that sales pitch as if it were gospel. It would take about a 30-second Google search to find faster laptops from VoodooPC or Alienware or Falcon Northwest or HP, not to mention the other Yonah laptops that other companies have already released at higher clockspeeds than the new "Macbook"!
Unregistered. said:I can't believe that I'm the voice of frickin' reason around here.
kenstee said:So, I'm not even tempted with this one. But, I sure am looking forward to MWSF 2007. I think they'll really have their act together by then. Personally, what will come down the road will be very different that what we saw today.