BRLawyer said:I have traveled a fairly lot around Europe, and no hotels have dialup access, I am sure...in fact I am Brazilian, and even there dialup is being quickly superseded by DSL and others...and if I ever need it, I don't think the weight of a cheapo white modem will bother me, honestly...
jbouklas said:I fail to see your point. How about this: the G4 Powerbook was 1" thick and had a DL drive, 13mm says you. This new MacBook is 1" and can't accomodate a 13mm drive. Not our problem. Apple spends billions in R&D so that it can figure these things out and deliver to us good products. If this was a priority, they could have done it.
-Jim
--------------------jbouklas said:Oh, since you mentioned the lack of S-Video outs again, I now see everybody's point. The new MacBook is an inferior machine because it lacks it. I guess it just didn't sink in the for the first 30 pages of this thread. Thanks for that,
-Jim
Signing off, as I'm getting annoyed for seemingly no reason.
Randall said:Yeah 7200 is sometimes noticibly faster, other times not so much. Remember that 5400 takes up less power, gives off less heat, and is most likely quieter then a 7200 counterpart. Those tradeoffs might be worth it for me. It's a tough call, but I guess I would prefer a 7200 because I feel that performance is everything.
I'd wait (not more than 2 months I suspect) for Core Solo to be out--and then I think a new cheaper MacBook or MacBook Express (wince) will "replace" the iBook.Edwin the Elder said:Sorry if this has been asked already.
Anyone know if Apple plans to discount the existing PowerBooks?
While the MacBook Pros look really interesting for power users, I suspect I'd be paying for a lot of power I really don't need. The price seems to reflect this.
The exisitng PowerBooks would likely be all I need for now, and unlike the MacBook Pro, they have S Video outs.
Alternatively I could wait for the iBook replacement.
gnasher729 said:Unless you maxed out the memory, you will get more performance if you buy another GB of memory at crucial, instead of paying for the faster harddisk, both at about the same cost.
Sorry, this is the "ProBook" thread... move along little ibook user...chemtw said:![]()
![]()
<---( pouting) I just want to know when the ibooks are being released. in all seriousness can someone tell me when they might come out. I need one, I was foolish and sold my G4 15" PB too early and need one for school. Think secret says that they maybe announced as early as next month but their crystal ball has been very clouded lately. I also heard WWDC, but when is WWDC? thanks for those who listend now im gonna go cry as i am forced to use this crappy windows machine for anothe few months.
Really, I expected it much earlier.. but I guess there main focus was probably the macbook just to get it on the market, your probably right it wont be out for a while... unfortunatlydarwin022 said:Sorry, this is the "ProBook" thread... move along little ibook user...
j/k... expect an ibook replacement probably March at the earliest, my guess is: summer or end of summer (shipping just in time for school)
MacMosher said:Really, I expected it much earlier.. but I guess there main focus was probably the macbook just to get it on the market, your probably right it wont be out for a while... unfortunatlyIm waiting on it I think.
How do you think the macbook will affect the price of the used PB's ? or will it at all?
chemtw said:![]()
![]()
<---( pouting) I just want to know when the ibooks are being released. in all seriousness can someone tell me when they might come out.
jbouklas said:To go back to an earlier comment, I would like somebody to please explain to me the great benefits of FireWire 800. It would seem to me that the biggest bottleneck when it comes to external drives is the speed of the ATA (SATA or PATA, take your pick) bus, not the firewire bus. FireWire 400 has a cap of, you guessed it, 400, while even SATA tops out at 150 (we're not talking SATA2). Is there really a significant, or even minor, difference in using FireWire 800, or is any performance increase seen due to a more efficient bridge that what is used in the previous generation 400s?
Thats what I have understud as well. And yes it would be logical for the macbook pro to come first... which it obviously did ahah.nagromme said:I believe they'll come out (although not called iBooks) when Intel Makes their Core Solo chip available. Which should mean within a couple months, as I understand it.
Since Core Solo was always expected to arrive later than Core Duo, I've never understood the rumor mill's insistence (at times) that iBooks would come first. It always made more sense that the PowerBook would go first.
We don't know for a fact that Apple intends to use Core Solo, but it's pretty logical.
digitalbiker said:Come on, Do you ever leave LA?
The rest of the US is hit and miss with Broadband. Most of the US does not have WiFi.
Major cities have wifi yes. But most of the US is rural and most of the US lacks broadband and/or wifi.
Not all McDonlads, Not all starbucks. Only those that are in big cities. PB's are for traveling, connecting on the road. There are phone lines nearly everywhere but wifi and/or broadband, Give Me a Break!
Grokgod said:I actually read this entire thread~ Whew
Jobs changed the name because he wanted MAC in the name.
I can understand why, its called Branding.
I think that the Powermac will remain Powermacs cause it has MAC in it.
This is a great update cause ... its much faster.
Pure and simple the need for speed for a MBP is crucial.
So its all good except for figuring out if this beast will run HOT or not?
Will it blast with all fans on?
I am surprised that posts from people on other websites, that have seen the MBP give so little attention to these issues.
I want to know if the fans were on and if the top of the damn alutray was hot as all the previous units.
TIA
SiliconAddict said:Now if only we could upgrade later to a dual layer burner people's bitching might subside.![]()
zync said:Umm, not really when it should be included in the first place. You shouldn't have to pay to upgrade; the system is a downgrade from the previous system!
Also, I hate having to use a card to add functionality to a computer that should be there. Not to mention having to have that card with me for a new computer just to use something that is currently on a laptop I own.
zync said:Umm, not really when it should be included in the first place. You shouldn't have to pay to upgrade; the system is a downgrade from the previous system!
Also, I hate having to use a card to add functionality to a computer that should be there. Not to mention having to have that card with me for a new computer just to use something that is currently on a laptop I own.
ailleur said:Wow i cant believe all the whining about dl burner. Im willing to bet most of you people have never touched a dual layer media.
The system is faster, lighter, you get an iSight, you lose a modem and something for a technology that will never take off (dl media) What a tragedy.
gnasher729 said:And in hotels that have only dialup access, the dialup will go directly on your phone bill, at the rate that the hotel charges, and when you get the bill, after you recovered, you'll _wish_ you hadn't had a modem on your laptop!
zync said:Umm, not really when it should be included in the first place. You shouldn't have to pay to upgrade; the system is a downgrade from the previous system!
Also, I hate having to use a card to add functionality to a computer that should be there. Not to mention having to have that card with me for a new computer just to use something that is currently on a laptop I own.