No, it's not just semantics. Betas are pre-release versions, which means that some functionality may not be present. GMC is essentially the final version and will be released pending QA. If bugs are found that are deemed critical (or whatever) then a new GMC gets released. I've worked at several companies that followed this process.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Releases Third OS X Yosemite Golden Master Candidate to Developers
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
No, it's not just semantics. Betas are pre-release versions, which means that some functionality may not be present. GMC is essentially the final version and will be released pending QA. If bugs are found that are deemed critical (or whatever) then a new GMC gets released. I've worked at several companies that followed this process.
Download GM 3.0
Does anyone know how to download GM 3.0 if I currently have Mavericks?
Im in the iOS developer program, and developer.apple.com gives me a code for the App Store, which I have redeemed. However, when I download through App Store and open up the package contents, it turns out to be build 14A373.
Does anyone know how to download GM 3.0 if I currently have Mavericks?
Im in the iOS developer program, and developer.apple.com gives me a code for the App Store, which I have redeemed. However, when I download through App Store and open up the package contents, it turns out to be build 14A373.
Only the GM Candidate 1 is a full installer (it's a separate redemption code from the earlier previews.) You install that then update through 2 separate updates to get to GM 3.
Are you upset that they are not following your practice and naming convention?
What is an MS Release Candidate? It follows their betas so is it a release, or a candidate for release?
There have been no GM Candidates before, only GMs and they were indeed the release version. They are using a different name here, could it not maybe be a different thing?
Yes, I've always turned off menu-bar transparency. I don't understand why one would want to make the important menu bar harder to read...
That's actually not how the term "beta" has been traditionally used.
"Alpha" releases are development versions, where features may not be finished yet or even ones that are planned are not yet present at all.
"Beta" occurs after a feature freeze, and is strictly supposed to be a release that people are testing for correctness of functionality (i.e., bugs). No new features should be getting added during "beta" and expected/planned functionality should be 100% present even if rough around the edges.
"Release Candidate" is, hey, barring the discovery of some showstopper bug, we aren't changing a thing, and this release is a candidate for potentially being what we ship to customers. ("Golden Master Candidate" is, I believe, Apple's name for "Release Candidate." If people would abbreviate these last few Yosemite releases as, e.g., GMC3 instead of GM3, that might help go a ways to quelling these kinds of naming disputes.)
"Golden Master" (sans the "Candidate" part) is what gets sent to the mastering plant for duplication and shipment. Typically, once GM gets sent to manufacturing, it's too late to recall it.
Of course, these days we are living in a world where because software is distributable over the network, software testing and releases and release schedules can end up being a little bit more...fluid than they have been in the past. This has both positive and negative aspects to it. There are a definitely a few software companies that I have had run-ins with who call what should be "alpha" releases "beta", and what should be called "beta" they call "release candidates."
I don't know what happened before Public Beta 1 with the Developer Previews (since I ain't a developer), but it certainly seems to me that through the course of the Yosemite development and testing process (at least the parts that the public was exposed to), Apple has generally stuck pretty consistently with the traditional uses of these terms. Certainly by PB1 I would say Yosemite was pretty darn close to feature complete...maybe 95% complete at the worst. And the GMCs I think are releases that Apple honestly could have seen themselves actually shipping to customers. Consider how small the change-sets have been between GMCs 1, 2, and 3. We are talking 50MB updates compared to 700MB-1GB updates we were seeing between PBs. That tells you something right there.
-- Nathan
I agree: I am very surprised, for example, from the inconsistence of the starting screen where there SHOULD be the running little circle and NOT the typical "installing something" line :-(
I would not recommend this. Apple doesn't support it anymore and has moved on. The fix and update was Logic Pro X. You will get performance issues if you try and run 9.1.8 on something like yosemite. If you want to run 9.1.8, run it on snow leopard, then it will run like a dream. I am telling you this from experience.
Yep, its the world we live in. Games these days for example aren't finished until roughly 3 months after shipping
These aren't GM's. They are GM Candidates. Don't know why this is so hard for some people to understand.
No, theyre advanced beta releases. Gammas if you will.
UI+HD4000 = laggy, it's ridiculous that apple couldn't fix these ****ING ANNOYING LAGGY animations!
(notification center, about this mac pane, and system preferences)
it's just a bad joke, how these three working on a $2500 system released a year or 1.5 ago!
The purpose of these developer beta and GM seeds is for DEVELOPERS to test their OS X (and to a lesser extent, iOS) apps for compatibility. Once it hits GM status, then apps built on that release may be submitted for review. That's the only reason the label changes from beta to GM.
Yes the term once meant "no possibility of further changes" but now it means "you can submit your apps".
Yes the term once meant "no possibility of further changes" but now it means "you can submit your apps".
With me it's a late 2013 MBP.
It mainly happens if the window is opened by another process or app.
It's not fun...
I'm really fearing to update my 2010 MBA to Yosemite... Maybe I'll finally need to sell it.
i'm sure it's not a hw-issue. it's a driver/kext issue. these are not hardcore call off duty/battlefield light-effects, these are just browsing the tabs in the about this mac pane, or sys prefs, and get into the notification centre by a gesture. even an iPhone 4S is capable to do that with a ****** SoC, not a desktop-class CPU/GPU.
and yeah, even if the "switch graphics card to save the battery" is off (so the 650M GeForce is powering the system), it's still bad. i mean 10 fps bad, at the peak!!
That would be amazing if this could go out as a GM with these so to say "TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE" weirdnesses.
GM Candidates (Apple called them Release Candidates in previous years) are supposed to be in a releasable state and every mentioning of Beta is removed.