Next chance I get I have to see that 27 inch iMac. Looks amazing. And with a quad core, that is pretty cool.
As a life long Apple buyer- I don't like where Apple is going at all. My first mac was the all in one Classic but most thereafter were tower models- either Power Macs or Performas and having a tower is nothing but a benefit. Apple is taking this design nonsense to new ridiculous levels that provide no tangible advantage to computing. Either make the iMac enclosure big enough to support modern up to the date compenents or build a non Pro tower.
I don't really get the effort to make the iMac so pretty. If it was a tower, it they wouldn't need to focus so much on the exterior of the box since it would be out of sight more than likely. Make an attractive monitor (which they already do) and problem solved. Plus, they could use cheaper desktop grade internals and it's a win win.
I'll wait for the revision that'll hopefully be cheaper and/or bring the i5 down to the $1699 price point and keep my fingers crossed for Blu-ray. I damn sure wouldn't spend $2000-2200 for an i5/i7 with having a blu-ray drive.
I'm curious to know how an upscaled DVD will look on the 27" monster. I don't even like upscaled 480p DVD on my 1440x900 screen as is. Plenty of artifacts and jaggies.
I agree with a few of the posters that the 27-inch is probably too big for the average user, but I know a lot of graphic and page layout artists, website designers and photographers that are going to be looking at their equipment budget to see how soon they can justify buying one.
You are going to bee seeing a lot fewer Mac Pro workstations in the design, advertising and publishing industry studios from now on.
George
It's just a USB TV Tuner away. 26/27" is a good size for the majority of people. Even me.There are also a lot of people (like myself) that want to use the new 27" as their main HDTV in their main livingroom. I don't use conventional TV's just computers. This new iMac would be almost perfect.
Just buy a PC. It sounds like macs in general aren't for you.
I'm a little pissed since I got my iMac 2 months ago. I knew that newer ones were coming, but I felt the free printer and free iPod touch was a better deal.
My 2.93 ghz iMac is still more then enough for what I use it for, but I'm sure you know how it feels. I wasn't expecting the updates to be this big. It's my fault.
They already know this. The trolls aren't here to sincerely debate the merits of Windows PCs vs. Macs. They're here to agitate the MacRumors segment of Apple's user base and astroturf their platform of choice (Windows).
There are also a lot of people (like myself) that want to use the new 27" as their main HDTV in their main livingroom. I don't use conventional TV's just computers. This new iMac would be almost perfect.
I'm a little pissed since I got my iMac 2 months ago. I knew that newer ones were coming, but I felt the free printer and free iPod touch was a better deal.
My 2.93 ghz iMac is still more then enough for what I use it for, but I'm sure you know how it feels. I wasn't expecting the updates to be this big. It's my fault.
They wouldn't have a letterboxed image as their wallpaper...It's funny they put an image of Star Trek on the screen, even though that movie is 2.35.
The more I think about it, it's a pretty likely scenario. It's the only logical reason they switched to 16:9 out of nowhere.I say enjoy your existing computer for another 6 months or so and jump on the new iMac with the next revision (which may include (*gasp*) Blu-ray).
I wonder why these people take the time to come in here and complain about Macs when it's clear they will never buy one? What is that compulsion to waste one's time so intensely?
The more I think about it, it's a pretty likely scenario. It's the only logical reason they switched to 16:9 out of nowhere.
Why is there no option to get a matte display? I do NOT buy a new iMac with glossy display, no!!!
![]()
So I was reading today on this site via gizmodo that the 27" can be used as a display with an input via Displayport. If this is the case, it could be used as a monitor to play Xbox360 on if there is a HDMI to Displayport adapter no?
Forget BluRay, watch your BD on your home entertainment systems, it's not needed on your computer.
iTunes is currently 720p but that doesn't mean that it will not eventually be 1080p.
Just think of what you would have had to have subtracted in order to make BD an affordable option. It's not worth the cost.
This configuration is smart thinking on Apples part. It has ample power, high quality components, offers value for money, and is environmentally friendly. All of these things are going to make the iMac an incredibly attractive option for people who are needing to upgrade their XP machines and are wary of W7.
Optical drives are going to become increasingly less relevant in time, they just take money away that could be spent on more important components.
What would you rather we watch on these new 2560x1440 screens? DVD? lol...I wish you blue ray people would stop complaining and let it go. Jobs said it was a world of hurt.
As a life long Apple buyer- I don't like where Apple is going at all. My first mac was the all in one Classic but most thereafter were tower models- either Power Macs or Performas and having a tower is nothing but a benefit. Apple is taking this design nonsense to new ridiculous levels that provide no tangible advantage to computing. Either make the iMac enclosure big enough to support modern up to the date compenents or build a non Pro tower.
I don't really get the effort to make the iMac so pretty. If it was a tower, it they wouldn't need to focus so much on the exterior of the box since it would be out of sight more than likely. Make an attractive monitor (which they already do) and problem solved. Plus, they could use cheaper desktop grade internals and it's a win win.
So Apple's bottom line is the only thing that matters, and the consumer's opinion is pretty much worthless? Good to know...If it's "pretty" alone that sells then that's what Apple should make.
It's a common theme.So Apple's bottom line is the only thing that matters, and the consumer's opinion is pretty much worthless? Good to know...
I say enjoy your existing computer for another 6 months or so and jump on the new iMac with the next revision (which may include (*gasp*) Blu-ray).
I think that's what I'm going to do (I bought my 24" iMac back in June). I'm aching for that new 27" with i7, but I think I can force myself to wait a few months. I hope...![]()
There are hdmi female to mini displayport male and vice versa adapters available. Just google it. I guess that means I could hook up my Sony blu-ray to my forthcoming iMac although I personally would not have need since it is currently hooked to my XBR7 Sony HDTV. If I eventually decide to get a blu-ray burner, oh well, OWC will get an order which comes with Toast Titanium Pro. Since I'm not doing movies yet that will be sometime in the future, if ever.