Well said. I can't believe all of the complaints about having to spend 5 bucks. For the cost of a cheese burger you can learn to be an IOS developer. Having been a developer for many years, I too remember the days of having to pay big bucks for development tools.
If this is indeed true, wouldn't you look back at this whole $5 thing as a unnecessary?
Do you not see the disconnect between your two statements?
I remember just yesterday, when the latest version of Xcode was available to everyone for free.
Like someone else said, what's next... iTunes ? Mail ? Quicktime ? Safari ?
After all, first it was Facetime, now it's Xcode. It's coming guys. It seems every Apple software that moved from HTTP downloads to the MAS gets a fee tacked on.
Ha.We do. The problem is its not in an App Store... its usually sitting hidden on a Server running things such as App Stores.
I remember just yesterday, when the latest version of Xcode was available to everyone for free.
Like someone else said, what's next... iTunes ? Mail ? Quicktime ? Safari ?
After all, first it was Facetime, now it's Xcode. It's coming guys. It seems every Apple software that moved from HTTP downloads to the MAS gets a fee tacked on.
I'd prefer that if the OS became free. It'd probably cost less if I bought only the apps I actually use from Apple.
And SOX would allow for a free OS ?![]()
This!
For crying out loud people, register for ADC and get it for free if you care that much.
My experience with MS development (some time ago) for Windows and XBox was expensive. The MSDN library was an expensive subscription and it was pretty mandatory for commercial Windows development.
Don't you think you'll need a (paid) developer account for that?Cool.
Might be worth $4.99 just to try out experimental iOS features like the iPad gestures.
And is that a new requirement ? Because otherwise, why was Xcode 3 free before. And is that a requirement that only applies to Apple, otherwise why can other companies still give away software free of charge ?
Or is that just the big excuse Apple throws out ?
Anyway, I'll keep working on my iOS app and maybe I'll get to release it someday. Xcode 3 is plenty fine, I don't need Interface Builder at all (thank god, because the current concepts of Xcode <-> IB are a mess).
Windows Server is not scalable to that degree. It's for small and medium sized organisations. You've got a better chance of finding a datacentre running OS X than you have Server 2008. Apple, Google, the Government, hell even Microsoft, use Linux and Unix for that.
It has been said a couple of times in this thread. The likely cause of the $5 charge is how Apple interprets SarbanesOxley.
It has been said a couple of times in this thread. The likely cause of the $5 charge is how Apple interprets SarbanesOxley.
I'd prefer that if the OS became free. It'd probably cost less if I bought only the apps I actually use from Apple.
Nah, they dropped the iOS upgrade charge for iPod touch users. The software update is free of charge. It's not Sarbanes-Oxley (that was the original explanation for why Apple was charging for iOS updates for iPod touch owners).It has been said a couple of times in this thread. The likely cause of the $5 charge is how Apple interprets SarbanesOxley.
I have used both. To me the biggest difference is Cocoa vs MFC. The IDE's seem pretty similar in terms of productivity.
In the end, Apple has the right to charge for their products. It doesn't matter if said product was free in the past.
You've got a better chance of finding a datacentre running OS X than you have Server 2008.
Apple starts to charge for using everything...![]()