Is anyone else getting an "Access Denied" page when you go to click on the download link?
(Yes, I'm a paid member)
I am getting this too. I'm also a paid member.
Is anyone else getting an "Access Denied" page when you go to click on the download link?
(Yes, I'm a paid member)
My experience with MS development (some time ago) for Windows and XBox was expensive. The MSDN library was an expensive subscription and it was pretty mandatory for commercial Windows development. MS also charge for game submissions (on a per submission basis).
Apple's token cost to prevent casual downloaders grabbing multiple 4Gigabyte files per year really doesn't seem like the end of the world.
C.
I am getting this too. I'm also a paid member.
Uh no offense but Visual Studio cannot be compared to Xcode. Xcode isn't even half what visual studio is. Developing in visual studio is so much easier to use to develop software than xcode. So charging that amount for visual studio is actually justified. Xcode for $4.99 is probably worth it.
NeXT didn't fail. They took over Apple and were paid to do so.
Pixar didn't fail either. They took over Disney and were paid to do so.
C.
What a bag o' whiners and free loaders. Let's see, Apple makes it available for $5 a la carte or free w/ any developer subscription. Please explain what is not fair about that plan? Maybe Apple would have been smarter to just say XCode is for developers therefore its only available to developers. I know a lot of other companies that limit s/w to trade-only, not retail customers.
And you suddenly need XCode 4 and can't use XCode 3 anymore?
I have used both. To me the biggest difference is Cocoa vs MFC. The IDE's seem pretty similar in terms of productivity.
If Visual Studio was *genuinely* 20 times more productive than XCode, wouldn't we see more innovative and more functional Windows software being developed?
C.
And you suddenly need XCode 4 and can't use XCode 3 anymore?
My 16 year old little brother who doesn't have a job and could barely even be considered a newbie programmer set aside his lunch money today to buy XCode when he gets home.
Anybody whining about the price needs a reality check.
Personally, as long as XCode 3 is available and can install a functioning compiler, I'll be fine. I usually use a more recent version of gcc than XCode provides, but it's tough to get to that point without the system compiler and toolchain installed. My concern is whether XCode 3 (or some free version) will be maintained as we move on to 10.7.
5$ are not that much of a problem. But getting an application via the AppStore (with Registration and CreditCard) can be amajor issue in some companies (like ours). It's simply not permitted. Period.
Talk to someone who actually doesn't know Apple's and NeXT's history perhaps might give you sympathetic support.
We used to sell NeXT Developer Tools for $4999.
You're complaining about $4.99 for a Developer IDE Suite that allows you to sell your apps on the App Store to hundreds of millions of perspective consumers and yet you're still complaining.
How much money will you lay down for booze, smokes, and other habits?
My bet is XCode 4 will be free for people who purchase Lion, but we'll have to wait and see.
Well said. I can't believe all of the complaints about having to spend 5 bucks. For the cost of a cheese burger you can learn to be an IOS developer. Having been a developer for many years, I too remember the days of having to pay big bucks for development tools.
Nope, Xcode 3 still works fine thank god. It's just frustrating to see Apple suddenly charging for something that was free. There's no guarantee Xcode 4 will be free when I need to update and there's no guarantee I will have a 99$ account by then either.
Also, there's no guarantee Xcode will still be included with OS updates.
It's just it seems that these days, Apple is all about nickel and diming. Huge record profits, yet let's charge for what was once free. The bottom line seems to be all that counts for Apple nowadays.
What a bag o' whiners and free loaders