Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ah, transphobic slurs.

Remember, folks: these are the same people telling everyone else they're full of hate and vitriol.

I did not use a single slur. I *encourage* you to report me We’ll see how that holds up

Let’s recap

Sex toys (counter theory to what it could be), penis (what many believe it is), and transgender (transgender isn’t any more offensive than saying gay and by that I mean it isn’t whatsover. To say it is makes you the bigot situationally),
Are the words I used. And bulge... as evidence of being transgender. None of this constitutes vitriol or hate or transphobia.

I also would like to point out I didn’t just bring up Michelle obama someone else did and I responded and I don’t back down

Pretty pathetic attempts at jabs! But like I said keep screeching like it’ll make any differences. Midterms 2020 or “getting me in trouble” here for things I didn’t do.
 
I did not use a single slur. I *encourage* you to report me

Sex toys (counter theory to what it is), penis, and transgender,
Are the words I used. And bulge as evidence of being transgender. None of this constitutes vitriol or hate or transphobia.

I also would like to point out I didn’t just bring up Michelle obama someone else did and I responded and I don’t back down

Pretty pathetic attempts at jabs! But like I said keep screeching like it’ll make any differences. Midterms 2020 or “getting me in trouble” here for things I didn’t do.

I'd like to know what you're doing staring at Michelle Obama's crotch.
 
I did not use a single slur. I *encourage* you to report me

Sex toys (counter theory to what it is), penis, and transgender,
Are the words I used. And bulge as evidence of being transgender. None of this constitutes vitriol or hate or transphobia.

I also would like to point out I didn’t just bring up Michelle obama someone else did and I responded and I don’t back down

You really should have backed down on that one, and apologized for using it. It doesn't make you look smarter, better, or tougher that you would engage in that kind of ugliness.

I don't care about reporting you because I don't care about you pro or con, but I will call out that kind of transphobic garbage when I see it.
 
I'd like to know what you're doing staring at Michelle Obama's crotch.

It’s not a private event. She was on the Ellen show. A cable television show. As for photographs and people talking about. It’s the internet. Never seen strange things on the internet that you scoff at but turn out to be true? I have no control over what I stumble across periodically news wise

Don’t turn this around on me. I didn’t bring it up

You guys are acting like such epically childish and sore resistance losers. I feel bad for you
[doublepost=1533676256][/doublepost]
You really should have backed down on that one, and apologized for using it. It doesn't make you look smarter, better, or tougher that you would engage in that kind of ugliness.

I don't care about reporting you because I don't care about you pro or con, but I will call out that kind of transphobic garbage when I see it.

I’m not apologizing for anything don’t tell me what to do, that’s fascist like, because I didn’t do anything and you need to stop your childishness

Report
Me if you feel better. There’s nothing there. I’m replying to a subject someone else
Brought up. And something I won’t back down from. Because it’s not incorrect or inaccurate.

Tough. You’re going to have to suck it up, and stop trying to throw shade my way that really isn’t sticking
 
It’s not a private event. She was on the Ellen show. A cable television show. As for photographs and people talking about. It’s the internet. Never seen strange things on the internet that you scoff at but turn out to be true? I have no control over what I stumble across periodically news wise

Don’t turn this around on me. I didn’t bring it up

You guys are so epically childish and such sore resistance losers. I feel bad for you

Right. You're not being a childish at all. You're a paragon of maturity and tact. :rolleyes:

Pretending that women you don't like are actually men is a common misogynistic tactic, just saying. It doesn't matter who brought it up, what am I, a babysitter? You engaged it.
 
Right. You're not being a childish at all. You're a paragon of maturity and tact. :rolleyes:

Pretending that women you don't like are actually men is a common misogynistic tactic, just saying. It doesn't matter who brought it up, what am I, a babysitter? You engaged it.

Once again I didnt bring it up. And I only
Know what I hear and see. If drawing conclusions from my senses (obama’s Own words and photographs and video of Michelle and something Joan rivers which I believe she said without a punchline and utmost seriousness in delivery) is unacceptable, well then were all doomed

[doublepost=1533676577][/doublepost]
I’ll just leave this here


Pant tents are static. Don’t move about a whole ton if at all

The video I attached there was a lot of
Movement and swinging.

Believe whatever you want. But don’t give me a whataboutism it’s the same as sitting down and pants being stiff. SMH. It clearly isn’t. Coupled with Barack calling her Michael, numerous times, and photographs of bulges in dresses I won’t attach because replying to something I didn’t bring up but won’t back down from either, is feigning outrage

The problem is I’m not falling for your
Tricks and your games. Even when you think I might be.
 
Pant tents are static. Don’t move about a whole ton

The video I attached there was a lot of
Movement and swinging

Believe whatever you want. But don’t give me a whataboutism it’s the same as sitting down and pants being stiff. It clearly isn’t. Coupled with Barack calling her Michael, numerous times, and photographs of bulges in dresses I won’t attach because replying to something I didn’t bring up but won’t back down from either, is feigning outrage
I was just trying to interject some humor, wasn’t meant to be taken seriously :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: thadoggfather
It’s not a private event. She was on the Ellen show. A cable television show. As for photographs and people talking about. It’s the internet. Never seen strange things on the internet that you scoff at but turn out to be true? I have no control over what I stumble across periodically news wise

Don’t turn this around on me. I didn’t bring it up

You guys are acting like such epically childish and sore resistance losers. I feel bad for you
[doublepost=1533676256][/doublepost]

I’m not apologizing for anything don’t tell me what to do, that’s fascist like, because I didn’t do anything and you need to stop your childishness

Report
Me if you feel better. There’s nothing there. I’m replying to a subject someone else
Brought up. And something I won’t back down from. Because it’s not incorrect or inaccurate.

Tough. You’re going to have to suck it up, and stop trying to throw shade my way that really isn’t sticking

I'm sorry that you think this is someone demanding something of you rather than trying to teach you something. I don't care if you apologize or not. I'm just telling you what it is, and you can dance around it all you want which honestly is just another way of backing down anyway. At least with an apology you back down in a manner that has some integrity to it.

Calling people losers and using transphobic slurs isn't going to "win" you anything here. And whether you understand this or not, it's already "Shaded" you as a very specific type of individual.
 
I was just trying to interject some humor, wasn’t meant to be taken seriously :rolleyes:

Humor isn’t allowed here. It’s fascist.

In all seriousness I considered that a possibility but hard to tell in this thread. Apologies.
-

Replying to something someone brought up without being accused of slurs or
Vitriol or transphobia , is disgustingly disingenuous from that other guy. I don’t appreciate it very much.
[doublepost=1533676905][/doublepost]
I'm sorry that you think this is someone demanding something of you rather than trying to teach you something. I don't care if you apologize or not. I'm just telling you what it is, and you can dance around it all you want which honestly is just another way of backing down anyway. At least with an apology you back down in a manner that has some integrity to it.

Calling people losers and using transphobic slurs isn't going to "win" you anything here. And whether you understand this or not, it's already "Shaded" you as a very specific type of individual.

You can keep saying that and im so confident I did none of those things that’ I genuinely encourage you to report
Me so that nothing will be done because I did nothing

...But repeating it with conviction- that doesn’t make it more true. It’s low energy.

So I’m not dancing around anything quite the opposite I’m just not backing down or apologizing for things I didn’t do.

I hope none of these get deleted so people can openly see the hysteria ! And it is somewhat on topic bc Alex jones was a believer and proponent in the Michelle obama
Transgender “conspiracy theory” and the thread is about Alex jones so technically it is on topic even tho I didn’t bring it up!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dannyyankou
Right, because there couldn't possibly be any other explanation... I suggest applying Occam's Razor a little more often and listening to crazy conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones a little less often.

What is the other explanation? Coupled with baracks Own words, other photographs of her in a dress with bulge, and Joan rivers not well received insight?


I’m genuinely curious what you can come up with. Coincidence every single time? That’s about all I can think of. Anything else?
 
What is the other explanation? Coupled with baracks Own words, other photographs of her in a dress with bulge, and Joan rivers not well received insight?


I’m genuinely curious what you can come up with. Coincidence every single time? That’s about all I can think of. Anything else?

I'm going to go a step further and add that I think she's D.B. Cooper, based on overwhelming evidence that she's not afraid of flying.
 
What is the other explanation? Coupled with baracks Own words, other photographs of her in a dress with bulge, and Joan rivers not well received insight?


I’m genuinely curious what you can come up with. Coincidence every single time? That’s about all I can think of. Anything else?
It's probably just a piece of fabric or whatever, maybe even something having to do with the wireless microphone. Who knows. This is so stupid.

 
It's probably just a piece of fabric or whatever, maybe even something having to do with the wireless microphone. Who knows. This is so stupid.


“Probably just a piece of fabric or whatever”

Case closed! It was just a piece of
Fabric folks. Man I gotta get my
Eyes checked. All the bizarre instances I outlined not just dancing on Ellen. All coincidences. The statistical probability of an odd situation every time, incredibly unlikely. But to stop arguing about something you aren’t happy about, we can go with that as the explanation

It may be stupid, the subject, that’s your opinion and fine, but for the *millionth* time: *I* didn’t bring it up. But I *also* don’t back down just because people want me to. Especially
When I have no reason to believe what I see heard, and because of that what i say, is incorrect. That’s not sufficient reason.

Especially when people keep engaging *with me* on the matter. I’m merely replying. I’m allowed to reply to things directed at me and attempts at shade. That’s fair game.
I’m not gonna pretend to have the opinion you have just to appease you. Because thats fake. But I’m also fine not talking about it because my mind is made up. This is been brought up because someone brought it up. Otherwise I would not have. Not because i have anything to hide, but because the responses are usually the same. I’m “hateful” for illustrating skepticism and pointing out that a coincidence every single time just isnt that likely. I know its your political team, but its not likely. But go with confirmation bias as it suits you.
 
Last edited:
Sex toys (counter theory to what it could be), penis (what many believe it is),

I can’t really believe many republicans think Michelle Obama is a man. Wow.

I mean if you want to discard some unreliable sources then dropping any that promote Michelle being a man is a good place to start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonblatho
I can’t really believe many republicans think Michelle Obama is a man. Wow.

I unfortunately dont have a polling number of how many people do, for you. You got me there. It shouldn’t be a partisan issue either. It’s just observing evidence and using ones eyes and ears to see and listen to what’s being said, by others, but also Barack Obama himself who calls her Michael mistakenly numerous times.

But i didnt come up with this ‘idea’. Merely the messenger. And because I cant dispute it, I have reason to believe it is what it is. You cant really counter the circumstantial evidence provided, more than one instance, numerous instances, but going all ‘wow’ can be a counter argument too for telling me its looney. I guess that works. But for the record, being shocked isnt an argument.

The ‘conspiracy theory’ has been out there for some time.

Just asking for clarification Too- Is Joan Rivers considered an alt-right/conservative comedian or person in general? Because she had these views too. And it wasn’t a stand up bit at all. It was a question in the street by paparazzi and she answered rather bluntly her overall takeaway of the matter

Genuinely kinda bored by this Michelle Obama discussion. This is for you guys that reply to me, not me. I’m not getting any new knowledge from revisiting this topic i wont back down from but you’re dying for me to do. So You decide and move on.

If you aren’t even willing to consider the possibility of being wrong, why be so curious in the first place? Boggles the mind.


ALSO***
A lot of people still dont ‘believe’ Alex Jones was censored, even tho he clearly was by Google, YouTube, Facebook, and it was all kicked off by Apple all in a 12h period. Alex Jones has been air for decades. But Monday was the day that was ‘hate speech.’ Banned from platform isnt censorship its just ‘disassociating with the guy’. Beliefs have nothing to do with it. Censorship has occured. Not speculative not conspiracy theory and not conjecture. Cognitive dissonance big time. SMH.

So to deny basic, clear, unambiguous facts that have already OCCURED and we are now looking back on from two days ago- its hard to hop to another topic With admittedly more ambiguity and grey area (but not so much I dont feel significantly more one way than the other) than raw censorship, bright eyed and bushy tailed and expect that you’ll be even remotely open minded about other things
 
Last edited:
I can’t really believe many republicans think Michelle Obama is a man. Wow.

I mean if you want to discard some unreliable sources then dropping any that promote Michelle being a man is a good place to start.

The transphobia is bad enough, but the whining about being called out for it is awful.

You’d think people insisting we need alternative viewpoints would have something better than “Michelle Obama is a dude bwahaha!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonblatho
The transphobia is bad enough, but the whining about being called out for it is awful.

You’d think people insisting we need alternative viewpoints would have something better than “Michelle Obama is a dude bwahaha!”

You are predictably yet again, making a statement I didnt make. And kinda losing it completely.

If you feel that strongly, I *encourage* you to report me about a subject I didnt bring up, wont back down or apologize for, but yet want to move past. Very low energy from your end. I feel like I’m a broken record player. Because I am.


Have you done that? Have you reported me? If so, how did it go?

If you didnt, I cant help you any further, because that is the recommended course when you feel a post is in violation of rules (and has upset you).

If you did, and nothing happened, I cant help you any further.



Acts of Derangement, looking for any shade whatsoever to fling at the other party.

You have no counter argument except “he’s transphobic”

How much more can I address it than to *encourage* you (over and over and over and over again) to report it because I’m confident there isnt anything there, except statements you put in my mouth I didnt say. Is that dancing around the subject?

I wont apologize, I wont back down, and I encourage you to report what you feel is a violation but is merely a feeling, not fact.

Now I see why you guys haven’t gotten over the 2016 election. You cant get over seemingly anything.

Screech away, its your first amendment right and I dont have a problem with it. I can disagree with the contents of what you say, however.

— This thread was interesting discourse, you’ve reduced it to Groundhog Day.
 
Last edited:
Are you referring to the case of Muslim gangs raping white British children and forcing them into child prostitution? Is that the case you are talking about?
What he was doing was illegal. If he wanted justice to be served that's not how you go about it, that's how you completely mess up a trial. He's a professional troll.

None of her comments are jokes. Sarah Jeong is a straight up racist. Full stop. You can't run from it. The left owns this now.
No she isn't. As everyone who knows her, her previous employer and new employer have clearly explained. As can be clearly seen by anyone reading her posts in context.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/3/17644704/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-tweets-backlash-racism - actually read it, don't dismiss it because it's not from a source you like.
 
What he was doing was illegal. If he wanted justice to be served that's not how you go about it, that's how you completely mess up a trial. He's a professional troll.


No she isn't. As everyone who knows her, her previous employer and new employer have clearly explained. As can be clearly seen by anyone reading her posts in context.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/3/17644704/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-tweets-backlash-racism - actually read it, don't dismiss it because it's not from a source you like.

NSFW because her tweet comments are despicably hateful and racist, but she is very much a racist.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/398/038/fd4.png

If you dont think she is, you are likely racist, you just dont have a problem with white racism specifically. There is no debate there either. She is racist.

VOX is crap. VOX = Verge = She used to work there = onto NYT *EDITORIAL BOARD* = Nilay Patel gave her glowing reviews and vouched for her. But racism is racism. Any other race, and it would be unambiguously unacceptable. But with white people: is it really though?

She shouldn’t even be a journalist. But on the editorial board? Overseeing the integrity of journalists and their work?

SMH

But! its great because its destroying NYT reputation quick. Only people who think she isnt racist, still think NYT has integrity. Those are the kind of people I want wholeheartedly believing in NYT. And not anyone else.

All of this is fantastic for redpilling purposes
 
Last edited:
For one he offers a different point of view on the same information. Number 2 he often reveals things years before the media reveal them because of agenda. This sort of information is needed and should be welcomed in a world full of deceit.


By different views you mean nonsense like parents who lost their children are fake crisis actors? And what examples can you provide of info he's revealed years before the media? Please provide specifics, it shouldn't be that hard. Lastly how do you no for certain what he spews isn't deceit?



Nah its controlled content pushing agendas for financial gain.

iu


So Jones who peddles supplements and conspiracies for money doesn't count?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
This keeps getting repeated with no supporting evidence. I’m still waiting.
If you cant see his constant dog whistles and the completely different way he treats black and minoritity groups to white ones then you're too far gone. It's a moments research away and many publications seem to have made pretty long lists.

What are you talking about? What is a stupid “white people” joke?
Buh? The ones that Sarah Jeong made that are so touchy for some reason?
 
  • Like
Reactions: widgeteer
If you cant see his constant dog whistles and the completely different way he treats black and minoritity groups to white ones then you're too far gone. It's a moments research away and many publications seem to have made pretty long lists.


Buh? The ones that Sarah Jeong made that are so touchy for some reason?


Vague non response for the first part that isnt specific to anything. “He just is, man”

More importantly-

Did you look at the JPEG in the post above?

You think ‘the ones Sarah Jeong made are so touchy for some reason?’

When Candace Owens replaced her tweets with Sarah Jeongs but Jewish and Black, she was softbanned from twitter. ANY OTHER RACE its blatantly racist. Only to people who are racist, and only at best the most naive people of all unaware of anything, dont understand the outrage over Sarah Jeong joining NYT. Especially when they fired another journalist days ago for crappy tweets;

You dont know why people are outraged shes on the editorial board, overseeing integrity of journalists and their stories, with tweets like that? No reason whatsoever? Genuinely curious
 
You are predictably yet again, making a statement I didnt make. And kinda losing it completely.

If you feel that strongly, I *encourage* you to report me about a subject I didnt bring up, wont back down or apologize for, but yet want to move past. Very low energy from your end. I feel like I’m a broken record player. Because I am.


Have you done that? Have you reported me? If so, how did it go?

If you didnt, I cant help you any further, because that is the recommended course when you feel a post is in violation of rules (and has upset you).

If you did, and nothing happened, I cant help you any further.



Acts of Derangement, looking for any shade whatsoever to fling at the other party.

You have no counter argument except “he’s transphobic”

How much more can I address it than to *encourage* you (over and over and over and over again) to report it because I’m confident there isnt anything there, except statements you put in my mouth I didnt say. Is that dancing around the subject?

I wont apologize, I wont back down, and I encourage you to report what you feel is a violation but is merely a feeling, not fact.

Now I see why you guys haven’t gotten over the 2016 election. You cant get over seemingly anything.

Screech away, its your first amendment right and I dont have a problem with it. I can disagree with the contents of what you say, however.

— This thread was interesting discourse, you’ve reduced it to Groundhog Day.

Listen, we get it. You made a transphobic slur and double dog dare anyone to tell you it’s wrong. Whatever. Godspeed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.