Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
NSFW because her tweet comments are despicably hateful and racist, but she is very much a racist.
All of this is fantastic for redpilling purposes
Anyone who uses "redpilling" unironically is likely already on the side where the facts aren't.

Reality doesnt work like this. People can see the context. People know what racial disparity is. People have senses of humour. Like the Right do, until it's convenient.
 
Anyone who uses "redpilling" unironically is likely already on the side where the facts aren't.

Reality doesnt work like this. People can see the context. People know what racial disparity is. People have senses of humour. Like the Right do, until it's convenient.

In what context is this ok to talk about another race like this? Please, bring me up to speed. I’m still genuinely curious

It’s not about ‘the right’ or partisanship, its about being flagrantly racist.

You would either have to be incredibly naive and leaning towards clueless or outright racist against white people if you see ZERO issue with those tweets. I’m not sure where else other people that aren’t these profiles, would fit who are like ‘what big deal? This is a joke. This is nothing! This has context! This makes sense! This is benign! Repeated incidences is always explainable!’

The left created these rules of calling people out for being politically incorrect. And her repeated hateful tweets without a punchline, come across as racist and hateful. Not gentle and contextual and lovey dovey. I cant believe people can see otherwise. Unless they’re one of the aforementioned.
 
If you cant see his constant dog whistles and the completely different way he treats black and minoritity groups to white ones then you're too far gone. It's a moments research away and many publications seem to have made pretty long lists.


Buh? The ones that Sarah Jeong made that are so touchy for some reason?

They won’t acknowledge things like racism, homophobia, misogyny because it’s what they traffic in. When they are willing to engage, it’s always something disingenuous like the NYT editor.

It’s a sham.
 
I lied this is my
Last comment but I have to reply to your reply to someone else because ...

Agreed ! I actually agree with you! No such thing as alt left. Ding ding ding.

Yes, Left has gotten so crazy no need to butter it up with an alt preface. Peak unhinged left is pretty normal these days and moderate left is treated as not ‘one of them’ it’s a hateful cult that resists progress. Obstructionist Party that never did anything for anyone; least of all, minorities. All rhetoric and using you
For a vote. Without results. All talk all the time. But sometimes no talk and just outright hate. Pretty standard with the star Maxine Waters. She’s a brilliant modern philosopher. Nancy pelosi too. She has perfectly encapsulated hysteria with her wax figure facial expression of stupor. Or
Perhaps the all knowing librarian and happy
Man and helpful man, a scholar and a gentleman mr Chuck Schumer. Or what about Adam Schiff - He’s onto some kinda Russia something. That guys is always at the cusp of a major breakthrough. Like rino “bipartisan” special appointed bob mueller. All the same sorts of people

And a personal favorite of the Democratic Party, pedophiles Anthony Weiner who jeopardized national security having official emails on his pedo laptop and Vice President of the Barack obama administration creepy uncle
Gropy joe Biden

And who would dare question the intelligence community when you have upstanding people like Stzork willing to put their politics aside to serve the American people?

STRZOK.gif



The resistance has a strong roster of
Logic and reason and love trump’s hate.

Also liberal dominant mainstream media would never throw shade at their own like that. There would never be a need for a dismissive rebuting term like ‘alt-left’ because media would never green light it in the first place. Doesn’t have a good ring to it for fake news headlines and sensationalism to justify hysteria
Wow. There is so much in this post that is screwy, I almost started a point-by-point rebuttal until I realized it'd just be like shouting at a totally deaf person, thinking if only I got loud enough they could hear me.

Suffice it to say that there's almost nothing in your post that's true, although I accept that you believe it to be true...and that's the pity. The left being crazy? Not only wrong, but hysterical coming from the right. "Never did anything for anyone?" The left has done a lot for everyone, the proof being that Trump and his henchmen are going around frantically undoing it. By the time the right is done, we'll be back to at least a six day work week, debtor's prison, and voting rights only for landed white men.

But your defense of all the crazy, hateful stuff the right is doing is...character attacks on Pelosi, Schumer and others? A no-context GIF of Strzok? Wow. Aside from letting you get your juvenile jollies, what kind of defense is that? You're calling the left haters and then resorting to hateful rhetoric yourself. Way to prove your point there.

I actually sincerely hope (but don't expect) that someday you'll escape the delusion you're living in. I know that you're a victim of conservative propaganda, but do try to see things from the factual side instead of just blindly accepting the propaganda of the right. You'd like it out here in reality land.
 
You dont know why people are outraged shes on the editorial board, overseeing integrity of journalists and their stories, with tweets like that? No reason whatsoever? Genuinely curious
In 2013/2014 we were in a stupidly long drawn out culture war. Anyone who posted anything even remotely leftish or nuanced got mobbed. *Largely by white guys.* I was one of these people, and I saw freinds having an absolutely hellish time with harassment. Some people went too far, people said stupid stuff, often in jest, often just reciprocating. Most people walked down from that precipise.

Yeah, they're bad tweets. That's all. If we're being judged for bad tweets you need a new president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
Because I don't have to agree with someone to think they deserve free speech. Why are you all about censorship of an opposing view? I assume from your response you have a difference of opinion than Mr. Jones. As you know, you and I do not have the same opinion on most topics. Do you think I should be censored? I don't think you should be.


Are you not for companies deciding what is best for their product? This isnt about free speech, Jones is still free to continue to peddle his tin foil material. Apple offered a service, which Jones freely chose to use, he in turn broke their TOS, they said no more. Jones has no specific right to use Apple's services, so this isn't censorship and his free speech is still intact.
 
Wow. There is so much in this post that is screwy, I almost started a point-by-point rebuttal until I realized it'd just be like shouting at a totally deaf person, thinking if only I got loud enough they could hear me.

Sounds like a cop out to me ;)

Also-

You say no context because you didnt watch the Stzork hearing, I did. Many people, on both sides, did.

You’d rather pretend to be right than do your own research/homework - thats cool but thats on you. Cant spoon feed you everything I’m an adult. You may have child like tendencies but you’re an adult, or if you’re not an adult you’re someone else’s kids and not at all my problem. Spoon feeding I dont do. I give crumbs. If you wanna follow the trail with a search engine and 5 seconds of your time, I encourage that.

Plus your avatar makes you seem amenable to new ideas :p so there’s that.

You didnt really say anything specific, as I would’ve expected, just like ‘I would point by point but nah ill write a few random vague paragraphs instead’

I implore you to dissect what I wrote.
 
The sale of 20th Century Fox dis not include Fox News, Fox Sports or the Fox television network.

You conveniently edited to quote only this part which didnt include the EDIT at the bottom where I disclose this correction previously

Where in the same footer edit I also disclose that the larger point remains, that Fox News is not 100% in favor of trump albeit still conservatively branded (goes without say)

Plenty of never trumpers.

But yet people want to pretend Fox News is like North Korean state media lockstep,

Even tho some talking heads on fox cannot stand trump (but are still republication or in name only at least). Makes total sense.

So it either is state media or it isnt. But the people engaging with me walked away on that one,
[doublepost=1533682070][/doublepost]
In 2013/2014 we were in a stupidly long drawn out culture war. Anyone who posted anything even remotely leftish or nuanced got mobbed. *Largely by white guys.* I was one of these people, and I saw freinds having an absolutely hellish time with harassment. Some people went too far, people said stupid stuff, often in jest, often just reciprocating. Most people walked down from that precipise.

Yeah, they're bad tweets. That's all. If we're being judged for bad tweets you need a new president.

This is a racist and sexist post and incredibly unconvincingly vague post without substance outside of racism and sexism. I’m not sure what to say.

Except I feel sorry for you. And I can perhaps make sense out of why you think Sarah Jeong’s tweets are no big deal. It came to me but I wont say anymore.
 
Last edited:
What does the user agreement on Infowars look like, I wonder? Would it allow for banning someone for hate speech? Or any other reason? Let's see, shall we?

https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/7/17661548/infowars-alex-jones-terms-of-service-censorship

You will not post anything libelous, defamatory, harmful, threatening, harassing, abusive, invasive of another’s privacy, hateful, racially or ethnically objectionable, or otherwise illegal.

You will not make threats to other users or people not associated with the site.

If you violate these rules, your posts and/or user name will be deleted.

Remember: you are a guest here. It is not censorship if you violate the rules and your post is deleted. All civilizations have rules and if you violate them you can expect to be ostracized from the tribe.

Yeah....I'm not going to feel too sorry for him.
 
Ok discriminate, they discriminate based on the fact that people are muslim and have the Islamic faith. I'm not saying that i agree with their religion (personally i don't believe in a God) but i do resect their right to believe in whatever faith they want, (after all we live in a democracy) as long as it's not extremism and preaching terrorism.

My point is the same for anyone, as a society we should be inclusive and not exclude someone/group of people just because they are different, not all muslims are terrorists just like not all Germans are Nazi supporters. There will always be a small group of people who spoil it for the rest.

(yea i just read that back and it sounded preachy, i really don't mean it that way)

Ok i can accept that, for a few moments there it really looked like you were, my mistake!
[doublepost=1533634852][/doublepost]

Anyone has the right to speak out against another belief. Disagreeing isn't hate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thadoggfather
Did cops get him for speaking in public space? No, he was using a private property and as such he's subject to the owner's rules.

Let's say you're throwing a party at your home. What would you do if a guest starts doing something you don't like, for example, insulting or making the other guests feel uncomfortable. Would you kick him out? That's what Apple did.

Back to the article, this guy does deserve to speak his mind, but that doesn't mean he can do it at everyone else's properties.
This isn't a question about government overreach, but rather about an overreaction within a single company, Apple. They have the right to do what they want, there's no question, but we don't believe that this was the correct course of action. They supposedly support free speech, but their definition only allows for the existence of speech that they agree with. This much has been known for awhile. It's unfortunate they don't realize what they themselves truly believe in, which is, in a word, fascism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thadoggfather
I think it's irrelevant. My opinion is that it wasn't a hoax but since I wasn't there and did not actually see it, it would be foolish to go around saying yes for sure such and such happened. Not just with Sandy but with anything in life.

The whole point of free speech is to allow to everyone to have their say. The second you remove that, you're no different than the Nazi's burning all material that didn't serve their purpose. End of story.


And Jones can STILL spout his crazy-ass crap! And you can still search and have access to it on Apple services and apps. You just can't browse through their index to find his shows.

What Apple has done is the equivalent of telling Jones that he can grab his megaphone and call out the demons on THIS street corner, but not THAT street corner!

He has not been silenced by Apple.
 
This isn't a question about government overreach, but rather about an overreaction within a single company, Apple. They have the right to do what they want, there's no question, but we don't believe that this was the correct course of action. They supposedly support free speech, but their definition only allows for the existence of speech that they agree with. This much has been known for awhile. It's unfortunate they don't realize what they themselves truly believe in, which is, in a word, fascism.


If Apple was a government, you might have a point, but they're not.
 
I think it's irrelevant. My opinion is that it wasn't a hoax but since I wasn't there and did not actually see it, it would be foolish to go around saying yes for sure such and such happened. Not just with Sandy but with anything in life.

So unless you see it with your own eyes and other senses, you question everything? Do you question 9/11? The moon landing? When Boris Yeltsin was drunk trying to hail a cab in his underwear outside the WH?

Or do you accept that these and other things happened because even though you weren't there, there is sufficient evidence to support that these events happened?


The whole point of free speech is to allow to everyone to have their say. The second you remove that, you're no different than the Nazi's burning all material that didn't serve their purpose. End of story.


Apple isn't the gov and this isn't about free speech. Apple controls the content on their sites, they say what is or isn't acceptable and by using their services, you are agreeing to those rules set by Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
This isn't a question about government overreach, but rather about an overreaction within a single company, Apple. They have the right to do what they want, there's no question, but we don't believe that this was the correct course of action. They supposedly support free speech, but their definition only allows for the existence of speech that they agree with. This much has been known for awhile. It's unfortunate they don't realize what they themselves truly believe in, which is, in a word, fascism.
This isn't like apple banning a news org. This is a crazy nut-job spewing hate and misinformation. Real people have been hurt. Real people have been threatened. Info-wars can go yell at the sky. Apple doesn't need to give them a platform. They did the right thing here. Only wish they had done it sooner.
 
Good! That means I'll be able to get a reservation at a Genius Bar much quicker now.
That's A way to look at it. I'm sure all that extra time will come in handy since you'll probably be spending a good deal of it there waiting to repair all of your next generation products from Apple's planned obsolescence.

Good luck to you!
 
Last edited:
That's A way to look at it. I'm sure all that extra time will come in handy since you'll probably be spending a good deal of it there waiting to repair all of your next generation products from Apple's planned obsolescence.

Good luck to you!

Should I get some ice, cause that looks like a BURN, friend!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmazingRobie
This isn't like apple banning a news org. This is a crazy nut-job spewing hate and misinformation.

InfoWars is not always right, but they are not always wrong, either. Like any source, you have to use your brain and check what they are saying to see if it makes sense. The problem is that some people think the MSM is a source of truth and take everything they say as sacrosanct. Let's take one example:

InfoWars called the 2016 election was going to be close. NYT, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, WashPo, HuffPo… all of them had bogus polling data and pushed it for MONTHS saying it was a blowout, Hillary will win by miles. Why did they all spew the same misinformation? Why did they all cover Hillary glowingly, despite her deep problems and hypothyroidism and fainting and seizures and no life accomplishments? Why did they fire people covering her health issues and gloss over criticism?

Remember the Madam President Newsweek cover? FAKE NEWS.
YRlCuci.jpg


Remember this cover of lies and projection:
8gon2p3.jpg


The reality turned out to be this:
cF7Pfz5.jpg


It's the looney left that turned out to be the "crazy nut-jobs spewing hate", with people like Maxine Waters even calling for violence against Trump supporters today.


Real people have been hurt. Real people have been threatened.

544 Acts of Media Approved Violence and Harassment Against Trump Supporters

Show me where Alex Jones' actions led to anything similar against Obama or Hillary or Bernie supporters or even anyone. If your response is "well he hurt some feelings", we can't even have a discussion because you're not even equating properly. Alex has tons of videos for you to try to use against me here -- or he did.


Info-wars can go yell at the sky. Apple doesn't need to give them a platform. They did the right thing here. Only wish they had done it sooner.

Corporate censorship is so cool and trendy! What a hip company! They should release an ad to some vibrant colors and someone dancing. Maybe remove the lightning port from the next iPhone to celebrate.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.