Details. I knew the faces and voices and attitudes to the death.Seeing the faces of the call participants? Or the engineering details and the faces?
Details. I knew the faces and voices and attitudes to the death.Seeing the faces of the call participants? Or the engineering details and the faces?
later this year = late december
How has it failed when the feature hasn’t been released yet?And Apple apologists will always excuse the company's failings no matter what....
Group FaceTime is a useful tool where there are no alternatives. Given what Skype for Business can already do, FaceTime isn't a serious tool for business users.
Certainly, there are niche users in a business setting where no screen sharing, file sharing, or event recording is needed. But even in a brainstorming session, who's taking notes for everyone to see? Every meeting room designed in past century has a chalkboard, whiteboard, or an easel pad so that ideas can be recorded and not just heard.
@Heineken mentioned conference calls of 30 people. But does that mean Group FaceTime is a good tool for the company?
Ha! My thoughts too.I for one am glad, it gives me more time to find 31 friends.
Details. I knew the faces and voices and attitudes to the death.
Skype is a HORRIBLE (and believe it or not, getting WORSE!) "Alternative".Skype is an alternative
Sometimes, especially in Software Development, you may THINK you are at the 95% "there" point, and then "real-world" testing shows that you have some fundamental design challenges yet to address...I wish they would just not announce new features/products way before they are even ready for release.....
So you admit that group FaceTime would be a useful tool, but just not a serious tool. I’m not following your logic here for something to be useful, why does it need to be ‘serious.’
Anyways, But in the respect of iOS, look how many iPads are used by corporations and businesses, or the Mac, where this would be more than useful in so many scenarios. Skype is an alternative, but why not have something proprietary with an Apple related device where a third party application doesn’t have to the ‘Alternative’ anymore . I think that’s equally as important in this situation The potential of group FaceTime.
You Keep reverting back to a whiteboard or chalkboard, not that that’s not useful, but that also doesn’t apply to every situation either. I think group FaceTime isn’t meant to be used specifically in one way, it can be diverse in the sense that they could be 15, 20, 25 people expressing their ideas with somebody that does take notes or record the data. I think you think you see this as being static, when group FaceTime could be very dynamic for companies for something more diverse or just a simple as open discussion.
Also, you keep posting all these scenarios where group FaceTime would not be useful by refuting my post, perhaps maybe we should allow group FaceTime to actually Debut when it does and then allow those to actually provide examples of how it did benefit them it’s situations where you’re saying it would not.
The OP answers this and confirmed in fact, it would be.
Came to the thread just to read the comments from the raft of “elite enterprise software developers” claiming it can’t be that hard for Apple to implement this feature.
Wasn’t disappointed and didn’t have to wait long.
Are you kidding?
Advantage is that it’s built in and company is issuing everyone iPhones now too. No extra costs and 3rd party apps is an advantage in my opinion.In your case, Skype for Business would be a much better tool. It allows for up to 250 participants and enables screen sharing, file sharing, white boarding, polls, etc.
Group FaceTime offers virtually no advantage in your situation as it has none of those features.
The example @Heineken provided suggested seeing the engineering details would be useful.
Oh great, I guess we'll see this next May like we did with AirPlay 2.
You know Apple, you really don't have to make it work with 32 people at launch. You could start with 4 which is the max that 95% of people will probably use. 32 is insanity.
"You can FaceTime up to 32 people."
"Why would I ever want to do that?"
In my personal experience, "Skype For Business" f/k/a Microsoft Lync, can't even handle a TWO person screen-share chat with any sort of reliability, let alone the scenarios you have set forth.Advantage is that it’s built in and company is issuing everyone iPhones now too. No extra costs and 3rd party apps is an advantage in my opinion.
Sometimes, especially in Software Development, you may THINK you are at the 95% "there" point, and then "real-world" testing shows that you have some fundamental design challenges yet to address...
Well I’m glad I never had to use itIn my personal experience, "Skype For Business" f/k/a Microsoft Lync, can't even handle a TWO person screen-share chat with any sort of reliability, let alone the scenarios you have set forth.
No biggie, Apple. Iron out all the bugs
No biggie, Apple. Iron out all the bugs
Is this really that difficult of a feature for Apple to incorporate?
Group FaceTime has no advantages over Skype, except that it's available on nearly every iOS device.