But it's curious when people who predict that the 5c will be a huge success don't actually use one (prominent example: Gruber).
Why is it curious that someone with a lot of money would prefer the better phone?
But it's curious when people who predict that the 5c will be a huge success don't actually use one (prominent example: Gruber).
Time have changed. When Apple released iPhone 3G and 3GS, Apple's system is far far superior to any other smartphones on the market, so people can easily neglect this material aspect. Nowadays, there are so many different smartphones on the market that are at very similar height, the small differences created by the materials are no longer negligible.
They make soda cans from aluminum as well. Are they premium products?![]()
I mean, c'mon. What educated consumer would buy the 5C?
I don't like when drinks come in plastic bottles.
Quite possible that Apple intentionally hurt scalpers. Build 5Cs above demand, so that all the scalpers will lose money - once the phones are available plentifully, nobody is going to pay full price from a scalper, and most people will try to take advantage and offer much less than full price to someone desperately needing to get rid of a stash of 5cs.
The iPhone 5 sold around 89 million units. So a 108 million iPhone 5C sounds like a risk-free number for a device meant to be popular.
Now production will be below the 60 million units, provided it keeps with that production until the end.
This is the first time that Apple is cutting production of a device before a cycle change. And if any of you know about economic of scales, it doesn't make sense to cut production a month after initial rollout, that is why production starts ahead of initial rollout. Otherwise all corporations would start selling from production day 1, and reduce production as demand decrease. It simply doesn't work that way.
When you cut on production, it only means that your product is not selling as expected and you rather lose money cutting production, than having your product on shelves which would cost you even more (ask blackberry about that).
There are people that like the 5C, but truth being said is the vast minority. Up so far I've seen a couple of 5S in the wild, but no 5C. Not even in college, which is the market that they are "targeting".
Remember Nokia and Blackberry. It only takes 2 or 3 flops to say goodbye to prime time and slowly fall into oblivion.
I prefer glass to aluminum or plastic, but that does not make the beer better. You still have to brew it well.
I don't get why anyone would buy this cheap-looking expensive phone when the 5s is just $100 more. Seriously, if you can afford 5c then you can afford the 5s. 5s is sooo much better.
too expensive, iPhone 5 looks and feels better and it is cheaper for about 130 euros in my country comparing with 5C. I know a lot of people who bought iPhone 5 not so long time ago. Price is fine, quality is good, hardware is superb for normal usage.
There's no iPhone 5C shortage? Can someone tell Virgin Mobile? Almost all of the models have been sold out since launch.
Sorry, "Space ****** Grey", better Mr Pedantic? I don't really fancy a pastel phone as a 36 year old man, just not my thing. I don't have "Hello Kitty" pyjamas either.
you are from the minority amigo,you call other iPhones dull,but you fail to understand that's how all sophisticated gadgets look.that design goes with them and never gets boring.to prove you are minority,look at the sales of 5c vs 5s.almost everyone prefer the 5s,not necessarily because it's more high end and definitely not because it has touch ID,but mainly because it looks so much better and feels much more high quality.The troll responses in this thread are going to reach ridiculous levels.
I'll field this one.
1) I enjoy the colored back of the phone. It brings a splash of color to a line of products that has been dull for so long.
again weird and rare taste.2) The rounded polycarbonate back of the phone is more pleasant to look at and hold as compared to the cold, industrial looking and feeling 5s.
most people wont sacrifice the quality and design of their product to save on warranty cost.what's next? I have $100 spare to buy more grocery? (but instead of having a nice metal iPhone I opted for the cheap looking toy model)3) I saved $100 by going with the 5c. That money allowed me to purchase Applecare+ for my phone.
The $100 dollar difference ($150 in some places) argument is just dumb.
Its 100% savings and thats a lot of money to people who work or have to buy for family. If I had a teen I would much rather buy a $100 or $50 phone rather than a $200 phone.
$100 vs $200
$1000 vs $2000
10,000 vs $20,000
1,000,000 vs $2,000,000 etc.
yes absolutely,4s looks much more premium than 5c.By that logic, does that make the 4s less of a "cheap" phone than the 5c?
I'm perplexed.
This has been a rare failure by Apple. I can't see why they didn't see this coming. They need to come off their high horse.
Black is absence of color.
Technically, it is the absence of (or complete absorption) of light
And white is the absence of pigment
This is why primary colors are sometimes red, green, and blue and other times red, yellow, and blue or cyan, magenta, and yellow
The iPhone is not made of light and they are all some color (but some are not "colorful")
Only in the additive color model (light mixing) is black the absence of color. In a subtractive model (dye mixing), black is the three primary colors mixed together.
Apologies to anyone who has already corrected this error.
----------
IOW, the additive and subtractive color models.
please show