Probably should let it get released and actually flop first before comparing it to an actual flop.Its starting to sound like it should be called Apple Pippin VR.
Probably should let it get released and actually flop first before comparing it to an actual flop.Its starting to sound like it should be called Apple Pippin VR.
You’re only looking at the situation today.Our iPhones, iPads and MacBooks all allow us to do FaceTime calls where you are yourself, not some computer generated thing
That was before they decimated the staff developing it. They have pivoted according to their recent statements. They haven’t abandoned the concept but adjusted a good bit.I disagree, they actually doubled down on VR.
Now they have both consumer Quest and high-end/Professional Quest Pro.
But the future is for AR, friction less see-through eye glasses that function as a phone replacement and provide a useful HUD for real life.
Why would they be trying to make VR more known when they are releasing a mixed reality headset?I think the $3000 price being said is an instigated Apple PR plan. It maybe $2500 and people will say wow that is cheap.
Apple PR machine, compliant tech media, and its hoard of Apple fans, will make VR more known to the public. And that alone will be enough for starters.
Sounds like a lot guesses to me being treated as facts by some customers.Sounds like alot of "IF's" to me.
This. Meta (and Apple?) thought VR was going to be the next thing then BAM: ChatGPT and AI made every everyone forget about it. If the rumors about this Apple headset are true, I think it is doomed to fail. A $3000 VR headset? Really? It sounds like executives have lost touch with reality.FYI, Meta has quietly pivoted away from VR. Even Meta realizes that the potential for a VR platform is low.
Where have you seen the prototypes? Surely you aren’t referring to the wild guess renders published on MAC rumors.The prototypes are far too slim. If Sony, the kings of product design can’t make the PSVR2 any slimmer then there is no way Apples device is going to be any better.
Interestingly you didn't mention Asia (I noticed your username), where in parts they sell women's used undergarments in vending machines. If you're going to list places, seems kinda biased and intentional to leave that out.
So whoever buys it will unknowingly subsidize a radically different VR product (possibly).If the price point is indeed $3k, then it automatically becomes a specialty/niche product that will not have sufficient user numbers to drive developer interest that could help bring it mainstream. Not that Apple wouldn’t take a chance with a product at this level, but it doesn’t make sense to me.
I would think that there is a much bigger play in getting augmented reality capable glasses produced, that use the iPhone’s processing power to make them work. Reading about how the headset will allow people to do FaceTime calls using avatars just seems awfully stupid. Our iPhones, iPads and MacBooks all allow us to do FaceTime calls where you are yourself, not some computer generated thing.
I think it will eventually, it just might take 2-3 iterations. At least part of the product's success (or failure) will be the content third party developers produce for it.I'm not sure this is going to take off.
I agree, that would be nice and funny.Can't wait. Meta has had a hold on the market for far too long. It would be funny if Meta ends up dropping their product after Apple eats their lunch, and breakfast, and dinner. One can hope...
So you've seen this finished product?Gone are the times where Apple patiently waited until they could get a product right.