Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually... the majority of other tablets in the market failed, even Google's own projects. The only reason Apple survived is because the OS was so similar to their phones and was extremely easy to use. Microsoft has seen success with the tablet form factor, the majority of mobile Windows devices come with touch capability. Apple could add touch to MacOS, they chose not to. You could buy a MacOS touch enabled device and still use it with traditional inputs, just like Windows.

I don't understand why the loyalists have this "all or nothing" attitude when it comes these issues. You can bet, if Tim thought he could make even more money by adding a touch screen, they would be included in the next cycle. I also think you'd be shocked at the amount of people who would buy one... especially if a touch MacBook (Air or Pro) was sold alongside a traditional at a slightly increased price. I think you'd see the stronger sales on the touch enabled device. Remember... it was Steve himself that said there's no better mobile computing tool than your finger, when he launched the iPhone.

And before anyone can say Microsoft is a flop or Microsoft is horrible... they still have 76%+ marketshare. (backed up by statistics, see link below) So calm down, I own a Mac... it's just a fact.

Sources cited, you're welcome.


I’m not a loyalist, but from my own view and anecdotal experience, I understand why Apple doesn’t make a touch Mac. I have a touch PC laptop and I have no desire to touch the screen (I only use the stylus for drawing). I also know people who got touch screen laptops but immediately stopped using the touch screen. The touch targets are too small, and it’s more ergonomic to keep my hands on the keyboard and trackpad for non-drawing use. Touch makes total sense on a handheld device. I think that’s what Steve was referring to when he said the finger is the best input tool. But at a desk or when a device is over a certain size, it makes more sense to put it down, and at that point touch a finger doesn’t make as much sense as a keyboard/trackpad/mouse.

I think PC manufacturers are probably just covering their bases by adding touch screens. Apple tends to stick more to their philosophies. Also PC manufacturers are probably trying to gain any edge they can over Macs. But I doubt the PC market share is so big because of touch screens. Probably more because they are generally less expensive, and because they’ve had a hold in the enterprise market since early days.

I do wish Apple made a portable Mac with stylus support though. Can’t draw with a trackpad. And a stylus is a precision tool, unlike a finger, so it works nicely with the small targets of a desktop OS.
 
I'm sure they explore things like this. It actually getting green lighted is another thing

Samsung has the Galaxy Ultra with an 'astonishingly large' 14" screen. I don't think it's selling very well.
 
Let it run Mac apps like Blender or Xcode and I will definitely be buying one.

16" is a great size for illustration, sculpting, and modeling apps. Unfortunately most of those apps are not available on iPad.

At 16”, I’m thinking this has to run pro apps. I can’t imagine Apple would make this just for light everyday productivity and slimmed down creative apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4nNtt
I’m still confused about this obsession that Apple should release their calculator app for the iPad. It’s very basic. There are much much better options on the App Store. The amount of whining that occurs about it here is baffling.

No one ever answers this when I ask, but tell me, why MUST Apple force their terrible calculator app on us when such things as PCalc exist?
I agree, it is really blown out of proportion. The only advantage of a built-in calculator would probably be a shortcut button in Control Center. Would be cool, but not a huge deal.
 
This is definitely bizarre. Is it even an iPad anymore? It'll probably be called something like the iPad studio, run iPadOS, with few if any professional apps.
 
I’m still confused about this obsession that Apple should release their calculator app for the iPad. It’s very basic. There are much much better options on the App Store. The amount of whining that occurs about it here is baffling.

No one ever answers this when I ask, but tell me, why MUST Apple force their terrible calculator app on us when such things as PCalc exist?

It’s just something for the critics to latch on to so they can continue to bash Apple. If and when the iPad does get a calculator app in the future, they will simply move on to something else.
 
The closer ipadOS gets to macOS, the more frustrated people get that they can’t just get macOS. Imagine how mad people would be if they only got macOS Lite. What functionality would it shed to make it lite?
The base iPad and iPad Air could retain iPadOS. People who buy an iPad Pro expect more from a device. They have become frustrated with the artificial limitations placed on their touch and pencil device and creative apps by iPad OS. Choice is good.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.