Give the two females in the image something to eat!
They were fat, but thanks to this fancy Wii thing they get up and dance around and lost weight. Look fine to me, not skinny at all. Nice to see people who are not fat, especially kids.
Give the two females in the image something to eat!
Give the two females in the image something to eat!
I'm guessing the one final legal issue that's delaying the deal is working out a license with Microsoft. Why Microsoft didn't buy them I have no idea. They probably thought they had a perpetual license the terms of which are now being tested.According to wikipedia, a subsidiary of Microsoft writes the software, but the hardware still comes from this Israeli firm. If this is true, it's a smart move by Apple. Why didn't Microsoft buy PrimeSense?
?...if you are with our girlfriend all cuddle... waving your hands sabotages all.
Why waving your hands when you already can move just one finger?
"Innovation"... nothing worst that moving your hands to change channels. I rather move the finger.
I willing to bet that if Apple does indeed release a TV, it will NOT come with a physical remote like we're used it now.
That is so unrealistic. The remote is always around.
If you are laying on a side, how are you going to wave your hands?
or if you are with our girlfriend all cuddle... waving your hands sabotages all.
Why waving your hands when you already can move just one finger?
Now, if Apple is into that, I believe they lost the train regarding Apple TV, I do not see innovation anymore that is not out there already.
Give the two females in the image something to eat!
That is so unrealistic. The remote is always around.
All the pieces seem to be falling into place for an Apple television, but I just don't see it happening. Apple doesn't have the retail structure to sell TVs....not to mention the fact that selling large televisions is not like selling phones, tablets, and computers. The average consumer won't buy a new tv on the same upgrade cycle as a phone. I think a fully featured set top box seems more logical.
Apple's Remote app
reasonable
Edit: It appears a moderator removed the controversial posts questioning Israeli companies' viability as business partners.
Seems like a sound piece of business by Apple though, following in the footsteps of the Anobit acquisition.
Now, if Apple is into that, I believe they lost the train regarding Apple TV, I do not see innovation anymore that is not out there already.
All the pieces seem to be falling into place for an Apple television, but I just don't see it happening. Apple doesn't have the retail structure to sell TVs....not to mention the fact that selling large televisions is not like selling phones, tablets, and computers. The average consumer won't buy a new tv on the same upgrade cycle as a phone. I think a fully featured set top box seems more logical.
Likewise I can't see how an Apple television set can succeed, but I put it down to price.
You can pick up a top end television (1080p/3D/Smart TV) at 50" for around the £600/£700 mark from the likes of Samsung or LG.
Apple may get away with charging premium for their phones and tablets. However I don't see them coming in below £1000 for even a 42" model and will non Apple consumers realistically consider an Apple television versus the regular competition? I just can't see it.
Well you should check with the history department about what shouldn't have succeeded then draw conclusions.
Apple and MS already have some sort of cross licensing deal, so this tec will probably get included in that.I'm guessing the one final legal issue that's delaying the deal is working out a license with Microsoft. Why Microsoft didn't buy them I have no idea. They probably thought they had a perpetual license the terms of which are now being tested.