I don’t think Apple is looking at Vision Pro to be the next iPhone. That’s wildly unrealistic given the price point if nothing else. Vision Pro doesn’t have to sell iPhone level units to be a successful new revenue stream, however. Apple has been trying to lessen its dependence on iPhone revenue for years and wearables have been a huge bright spot.Just like Meta is investing everything into VR, Apple has its hopes for the future based on Vision Pro being the next iPhone. If it fails, the long-term outlook is not so rosy. Now, I think Vision Pro will succeed massively. But so many people here disagree. The only number Apple improves on quarter after quarter, year after year is based on services. Something has to make up for the lack of iPad, iPhone and Mac prosperity. Better be Vision Pro.
That’s rich considering he’s the one who amassed many of those resources for the company. Look at company numbers when he took over versus now. Your comment is ridiculous.I see Tim raping the company of all its resources.
And how’s that exactly? Tim Cook has built Apple into the most successful company of all time and the most respected tech company on Earth. What exactly is he taking?Taking as much as he can year after year. Selling the future for right now.
That’s hilarious, not to mention flat out wrong. Why was Steve fired from Apple? Because he didn’t care about the money, as you say, and would have bankrupted the company by pursuing a Mac-only strategy when the Apple II made all the money. He still didn’t learn his lesson at NeXT, where he amassed tons of debt and never turned a profit. He eventually learned to care about the money and he most definitely cared about the money when he took over leadership at Apple.It’s a major problem in public corporations. That’s why need someone who doesn’t care about the money in charge. Like Steve Jobs. Apple would have a much more secure future if they had gone with Scott Forestall and Jon Ive as their strategy moving forward versus Tim Cook.
Really? What should they be doing by now? The SoC is pretty huge. No one gets that kind of performance and battery life.The MacBooks have gone backwards in every phase except SoC.
It was about control more than money. Apple has always wanted to control the whole widget. That was Jobs’ dream from day one. If you’re such a Steve Jobs fan you should understand that. Building their own chips was one of his biggest dreams.That also was about money.
Really? You want to get rid of the guy who built most of the wealth for the company? The one who has launched multiple successful new product categories? The one who realized Jobs’ vision for building a custom Apple processor for all product lines? That guy? Hilarious.Think we need a massive notch on our MacBooks? What about outdated SD cards and HDMI that didn’t have the same bandwidth as Thunderbolt. Thicker when they now don’t need to be to support legacy ports. I know I am not in the majority here, but I don’t care. All I care about as a user and investor is getting Tim Cook out and moving forward with someone who understands the technology inside these Apple products instead of a money now versus selling soul to devil for a company with no vision later.