One day, and that day will never come, companies that carry these profit margins will be required to move some of those profits to end homelessness and poverty in the USA.
Companies are in business to make money for their owners. That is it.[sarcasm]
Oh wow, what wonderful news! I'm so glad to read that wonderful human Tim Cook is making boatloads of money for himself and Apple shareholders, and I'm so glad he does that by giving customers like me much less functional products while also raising prices. Cook is far preferable to Steve Jobs. Jobs gave customers like me more functionality in products for relatively lower prices, but that really disappointed me because it meant Apple shareholders were making less money. Customers like me are less human than very rich people like Cook and Apple shareholders, so we need to make sure they keep making even more money.
[/sarcasm]
You mean he is void of a personality?A person cannot be something that he is not.
I mean, do you wish that he was an actor, and pretended to be Steve Jobs? How would someone lying to you help you feel better about a corporation?
Companies are in business to make money for their owners. That is it.
Sure, companies should also provide better benefits to their employees and make them feel worth something too.
At the end of the day, though, the core principal of every company is to maximize shareholder profits.
Apple doesn't make iPhones to make the world a better place. Apple makes iPhones to make their shareholders richer.
I mean, what would you rather prefer?
All signs point to people holding on to their devices longer, and I don’t think this is necessarily a bad thing in itself. I used my 8+ for 4 years prior to upgrading to the 13 pro max, which I expect to keep for at least an equivalent period of time. My series 5 Apple Watch will be 5 years this September, and I am upgrading only because it won’t get the next OS upgrade. My M1 MBA is more than 3.5 years old and still going strong (even with “only” 8 gb ram and 256gb storage).
So it’s “common sense” that Apple pivots to higher prices, more accessories and services. Which again has its benefits. For instance, even if I upgrade my iphone only every 4-5 years, I still make Apple money by way of subscriptions, app purchases and Apple Pay. This gives Apple incentive to keep me a happy and satisfied iOS user (most notably through their long software support, something many android smartphone OEMs don’t do because there simply is no financial incentive for them to).
Apple hardware cost more upfront, but they also last longer, and therefore pay for themselves in the form of fewer problems and improved productivity overall.
I feel that Apple’s priorities and mine are kinda aligned in that regard. I continue to pay them, and they continue to give me a great user experience.
I don't understand sentiments like this.[sarcasm]
Oh wow, what wonderful news! I'm so glad to read that wonderful human Tim Cook is making boatloads of money for himself and Apple shareholders, and I'm so glad he does that by giving customers like me much less functional products while also raising prices. Cook is far preferable to Steve Jobs. Jobs gave customers like me more functionality in products for relatively lower prices, but that really disappointed me because it meant Apple shareholders were making less money. Customers like me are less human than very rich people like Cook and Apple shareholders, so we need to make sure they keep making even more money.
[/sarcasm]
You may be right. But he doesn't really bring much charisma to the role. I'm wanting to see some personality.
Apple is about privacy, the environment and sustainability.
I agree.I don't understand sentiments like this.
First off, you all make it sound like someone is pointing a gun to your heads and forcing you to buy Apple products at overly-inflated prices. What is instead happening is that millions of people around the world are happy throwing billions of dollars at Apple because they believe their products fill a need that they simply can't find anywhere else in the world. They could easily buy cheaper alternatives elsewhere, and yet they don't. There's clearly something about Apple that's worth voluntarily spending a little more money, and that is not naturally a bad thing.
And well, second, it is wonderful compared to the bloodbath of an earnings call that Intel just had.
Did you look at the chart? On what planet is services revenue volatile?Serious question.... Obviously Apple knows what they are doing. But each quarter the pie chart is always mostly iPhone sales. I wonder if Apple is worried that one quarter of iPhone sales greatly declining can erase alot of their revenue? Trying to think of different avenues Apple can use to lessen its dependence on iPhone. Clearly Service revenue has potentinal, but that can be volitile.
Im in that group. Im still using a 14 year old Mac Pro. Im saving for a Mac Studio but havent pulled the trigger yet as my Mac Pro does everything i need. Sure my software is out of date but theres nothing new that i really need yet. My mac is rock solid.It’s a testament to their longevity and durability probably. Better build quality overall, plus no annoying blue screens to worry about.
Oh no I agree, the iPhone is really popular and probably will be for sometime. But we have to take into account the overall market and how many people are looking for a new iPhone and will that increase or decrease drastically over time? Plus there is a lot of things really out of their control, supply chain distruptions, competition, the economy, etc. As we have seen in the past, it doesn't take much for the market to go haywire and consumers qucikly change their spending trends.Did you look at the chart? On what planet is services revenue volatile?
On iPhone, it’s their most popular product. Every company has a cash cow. Apple has meaningfully reduced its reliance on iPhone over the years, but a successful product is not necessarily a risk to the company. It’s just really popular still.
You mean sales, not dropping prices. Apple generally does not drop prices.Apple’s gross margin is skyrocketing in recent years. They could easily drop their prices on iPhones and Macs. Dropping prices would make them sell more which in turn would up their gross margin again and make more profit. I guess Apple is becoming more of a luxury brand you can’t avoid. Just like Nvidia who have a de-facto monopoly in high-end graphics cards.
Lol. Those days exist more than ever. Not sure what world you're living in, but it's not the same as everyone else's.The days of companies existing purely for profit is over.
Apple is about privacy, the environment and sustainability.
If Apple was polluting the planet would you still buy their phones? If Apple used your private data to make money would you buy their phones?
You could argue they do these things to make money.
But making money is a result of being good at business. Not the reason to go into business.
I would buy a new Nano the exact Moment it will be released 😎They really need to market the iPod, it looks like sales have fallen off!
Warren Buffett always does this short term; The same person buys major Japanese trading house stocks and then sells them every few years. There is no real value in this story, especially being from CNN.Some investors are not drinking the apple juice/Kool aid any more. https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/03/business/berkshire-hathaway-apple-stock/index.html
"Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway cuts stake in Apple by nearly 50%"
No, the iPad hasn’t JUST outsold the Mac. In terms of units, from the year it was released, the iPad has been outselling the Mac by at least 2:1 every year, even in what’s considered a “bad” year like last year. And you’re right, the revenue being slightly higher by dollars means a truly MASSIVE number of (on average, less expensive) physical units were delivered to customers in the last three months compared to the Mac.iPad just outsold the Mac. Thats funny but I guess it saw a spike due to the new Pro models.
No, the point they’re making is that they read roughly $20 billion, heard that Apple was getting roughly $20 billion from Google and, with no thinking further than that made a comment basically saying “These two numbers are SOOOO close!” without taking into account that one is quarterly and one is yearly. It happens every quarter, without fail. Which is fine, hot takes are not known for their accuracy. They just don’t like it when someone points it out.I think the point people are making is that a large chunk of services revenue is not from what most people think of when services are mentioned i.e Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple Arcade etc.
That $5 bill a quarter is probably much higher than some of their actual software services bring in per year.
Or…it’s not weird and your statements are just wrong. Others see plenty of value or Apple would not make said profit.21B in profit -- in one quarter
Yet seemingly with no good new ideas, it's so weird
Car - fail
Scuba Mask - fail (so far)
Some folks ask for Mini iPhones & iPads and Apple can't be bothered
Macs are kind of all over the map on what's been updated or not
iPads continue to have a Ferrari racing engine trapped on a go kart track of an OS
Siri still sucks
Dictation still sucks
Now wasting time trying to convince everyone AI is next (which they are super late to also)
Just twisting around in the wind, arms extended, with gazillions of dollars flying around with Tim at the center of the twister
A cash tornado with no real direction
Or…it’s not weird and your statements are just wrong.
21B in profit -- in one quarter
Yet seemingly with no good new ideas, it's so weird
Car - fail
Scuba Mask - fail (so far)
Some folks ask for Mini iPhones & iPads and Apple can't be bothered
Macs are kind of all over the map on what's been updated or not
iPads continue to have a Ferrari racing engine trapped on a go kart track of an OS
Siri still sucks
Dictation still sucks
Now wasting time trying to convince everyone AI is next (which they are super late to also)
Just twisting around in the wind, arms extended, with gazillions of dollars flying around with Tim at the center of the twister
A cash tornado with no real direction