Location: Seattle, Washington & Siem Reap, Cambodia
Two of my favorite places.
Location: Seattle, Washington & Siem Reap, Cambodia
There have always been two kinds of Mac users.
1. The Mac users who are excited about all the features of the Mac Computers, Mac OS and Apple software. They always want the latest that Apple has to offer and can't wait to get their hands on it.
2. The Mac users who use the Mac because it is the most reliable and stable platform for the software they need to perform their job. They tend to be more cautious and wait until the dust settlers before jumping into a new piece of hardware or a new operating system.
Personally, I fall under item #2. I'm still anxious for the release, because the sooner it comes out, the sooner the dust will settle. Looking forward to using Lion in August.![]()
...with 10.3 being the worse (anyone remember the oxford chipset corrupt bug?).
Wonder how many of the trolls and nay-sayers have even used a Mac. Seems like the biggest critics have never touched one. I've been a Windows user, developer, and IT support since Windows 3.0, and when I want to relax or be productive, I always fallback to my Macs. Windows 7 is a good OS, but it ain't OS X. Apple bring it on. I'm ready for the latest big cat. I am confident there will be very few if any issues. But then again, I never have issues as I always prep for a major release by checking permissions, etc.
I'm running the Lion GM here and compared to previous releases it is a whole lot more reliable to the point that I actually feel confident enough to use it for both my laptop and desktop computer.
Side note: It is amazing how people talk about how 'great' previous releases were but ignore but ignore just how much of a PITA they were when they originally appeared. Take 10.4 and how when 10.5 was released there were people on this very forum saying, "oh, 10.4 was so much more reliable" ignoring the fact that they moved to Intel Mac when it was sitting at around 10.4.4 (thus avoided the x.0 blues). Compared to previous releases, 10.6 and 10.7 have been a heck of a lot more reliable than 10.3/10.4/10.5 when they first arrived on the scene with 10.3 being the worse (anyone remember the oxford chipset corrupt bug?).
Reminds me very much of the old geiser talking about the 'good old days' whilst ignoring what the 'old days' were actually like - the reality is if you've been with Mac OS X since 10.0 was released there has been an upward improvement in the quality of x.0 releases and Lion is pretty much at the stage where you can feel pretty confident to run it from day one - the question is whether third parties have pulled finger and tested their products (and issued updates) or are they going to do an Adobe and force an upgrade on end users instead of providing patches.
Edit: Btw, I'm running Adobe CS5 'Web Premium' Edition and everything is working beautifully - Office 2011 has no problems along with the various OmniGroup products I have as well.
Hmmm, on my PC, Windows 7 updates itself once in a while and I do not need to prep for anything. That's what I call - being productive![]()
Jerome Morrow said:I'm running the Lion GM here and compared to previous releases it is a whole lot more reliable to the point that I actually feel confident enough to use it for both my laptop and desktop computer.
Side note: It is amazing how people talk about how 'great' previous releases were but ignore but ignore just how much of a PITA they were when they originally appeared. Take 10.4 and how when 10.5 was released there were people on this very forum saying, "oh, 10.4 was so much more reliable" ignoring the fact that they moved to Intel Mac when it was sitting at around 10.4.4 (thus avoided the x.0 blues). Compared to previous releases, 10.6 and 10.7 have been a heck of a lot more reliable than 10.3/10.4/10.5 when they first arrived on the scene with 10.3 being the worse (anyone remember the oxford chipset corrupt bug?).
Reminds me very much of the old geiser talking about the 'good old days' whilst ignoring what the 'old days' were actually like - the reality is if you've been with Mac OS X since 10.0 was released there has been an upward improvement in the quality of x.0 releases and Lion is pretty much at the stage where you can feel pretty confident to run it from day one - the question is whether third parties have pulled finger and tested their products (and issued updates) or are they going to do an Adobe and force an upgrade on end users instead of providing patches.
Edit: Btw, I'm running Adobe CS5 'Web Premium' Edition and everything is working beautifully - Office 2011 has no problems along with the various OmniGroup products I have as well.
I can only speak for myself and Snow Leopard GM is really better than Lion GM on my test Mac. I used Time Machine to go back to the Snow Leopard GM.
Funny, Windows updater is the most obnoxious thing about it. It has to restart the computer like 14 times and makes you wait when its starting up and when you shut down and comes on at the most inconvenient times. I was watching a Starcraft 2 tournament and one of the players had his Windows update come on and restart his computer in the middle of a game. Then you install them, and the next time you start the computer it has 2 more updates. Seems like there's always 2 more.
But anyway, back to OSX Lion. Arg. Can't believe they are dropping Rosetta support, but whatever. I hope that's not a big deal. They removed Front Row...uh...what was that supposed to accomplish? I'm running GM on 2 comps, and the features are completely useless. The airdrop works ok, but could be better. If they asked me, I could come up with lots of better improvements.
I'll be honest, I still don't understand how using a product extensively, evaluating it objectively, and then liking it makes someone a "fanboy".
Then the user was clearly an idiot because you can set windows update to sleep, to download and install later, even not bother you or decide when you will update your computer. Also he hadn't patched his computer for a time if what you are saying is true. Who does that on a windows system? Apple's update program is also lame as a unix system shouldn't have to reboot.
Not sure it works that way. Doesn't even Aperature 3 have updates via the regular Apple Update service even though it's bought from the App Store?
Nope, it comes through the App Store. Anything purchased through the App Store update through it.
You know the same thing can be said pretty much with any operating system that exists out there.
So those that acquire Lion illegally might not be able to install Lion updates? IMO, that would be a good thing.
So those that acquire Lion illegally might not be able to install Lion updates? IMO, that would be a good thing.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
Mind my sarcasm but wow - I am so awestruck by your depth of analysis.
Do us a favor and do a clean install with lion compatible apps from reputable vendors then com back to comment on the supposed lack of quality in the Lion GM.
Can I expect full compatibility with a Xerox laser printer, canon scanner and such? I am confident the software will run on the Mac nicely, just worry about being the early adopter and having driver type issues. Or is it really not a problem since it is still a "10 - decimal - insert sequence number here" - release?
The apple these days will practically throw any product out on the market without even trying it themselves.
They've been doing this since 2007 no reason to stop now.
I, myself, give products SEVERAL months of release before buying anything from apple. They have had the WORST quality control of any tech company out there. Yes products are made of quality materials but on the software side, holy cow I don't know where they find their programmers.
Definition of an Apple Evangelist.