Apple really do live in a different universe to me - this is some kind of meme of their G5/Mac Pro design. Can’t see this lasting any longer than the trash can at those prices.
Interesting that a 1988 serial digital interface was adopted for pro video monitors. The coaxial cable has a number of advantages that supports the 4K+ digital monitors.
It's a great machine, but i'm disappointed with the storage. Only two SSDs at 2TB each max. I had the Mac Pro 2010 and you could fit four drives. What do I do in this situation. I have four (4) 4TB hard drives in a RAID0 on my PC build - would have to go external yes?
Agreed. The trend is away from massive internal storage and towards massive external storage, as it should be. Been rocking a Synology 918+ and its win, 24TB in RAID6 for about a grand. And you don’t have to go RAID for big, fast external storage. Thunderbolt = no bottleneck. Plenty of options.Yah and that would be a better option nowadays anyway. A NAS can automatically backup to Backblaze and be hot swappable with no tools.
The problem with Apple is that they do not specify the exact models of their processors. If you check Xeon W data on Intel website, you won't find a model matching Apple specs (3.5GHz Intel Xeon W, 8 cores, 16 threads, Turbo Boost up to 4.0GHz, 24.5MB cache). Sometimes Apple seemingly request custom models from Intel just to make price comparisons impossible. Not all W processors are that expensive.And it's still the previous generation Xeon processor. You're paying $592 extra for that configuration. I can buy a 64GB stick of RAM for that price. The only difference would be the GPU, which is not that much better. The Quadros are only worth it when you have the high memory version of 16GB+. At 8GB it's not that much better than a consumer card. Also, that Precision only supports optane memory to 6TB whereas the Mac Pro can take up to 32TB.
So in the end, it's actually very competitively priced considering the premiums Apple usually places on their products.
How much should a Xeon workstation like the 2019 Mac Pro cost? What do equivalent workstations cost?
Well, perhaps you misunderstood my post - you're preaching to the choir. Right now, if this is really of the old cheese grater design with motherboard updates, etc., I could almost justify buying the low end model, having faith that I could gradually upgrade it over a few years (first priority would be to add more SSD storage a.s.a.p.). This is perhaps the best thing Apple has come out with for professional use in at least 7 years. My faith in Apple with the Mac has been severely ruptured over the last several years, and before investing in something like this, I want to have my confidence restored that Apple is serious about Macs and MacOS for the future. I'll give you a link to a sample of the competition for this new Mac Pro from System76, with its high end Thelio. Go to the link and design the machine of your dreams, then compare. It's a Linux machine, not Windows:Come on dude really you need to spec out your computer out to $20000 dollars right away!!!! And who says you have to use apple SSD's and Apple memory and if you watched the developers conference, it has a standard PCI slot of if you don't want to go super duper on the video card you don't have to. I am going to get the lowest graphics card and upgrade the card in a year or two! That is what is great about the new Mac Pro you can upgrade it yourself!!!!!
Well, the difference this time is that they are no longer cornered themselves on a thermal wall and more traditional approach in design would allow them to get more frequent update unlike their previous trash can design. Due to pressure by AMD in recent years and Intel is finally starting to move away from 14nm starting next year so Mac Pro is not in a bad position like it looks currently. Intel is also moving to Pcie 5.0 in couple of years.
I like it a lot, but the entry-level pricing is crazy. It’s not unreasonable to want a Mac Pro that starts at around what Mac Pros have always cost.
The problem with Apple is that they do not specify the exact models of their processors. If you check Xeon W data on Intel website, you won't find a model matching Apple specs (3.5GHz Intel Xeon W, 8 cores, 16 threads, Turbo Boost up to 4.0GHz, 24.5MB cache). Sometimes Apple seemingly request custom models from Intel just to make price comparisons impossible. Not all W processors are that expensive.
I know, man, they finally step up and now people are bitching about the way it looks. Holy hell, you're not going to mount it above your fireplace, are you?
I pity the poor spouses of this whining bunch.
Apple today at its WWDC 2019 keynote unveiled its long-awaited Mac Pro redesign.
![]()
The all-new Mac Pro is an absolute powerhouse with up to 28-core Intel Xeon processors, up to 1.5TB of ECC RAM, up to 4TB of SSD storage, up to AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo graphics with 64GB of HBM2 memory, and eight PCIe expansion slots for maximum performance, expansion, and configurability.
The new design includes a stainless steel frame with smooth handles and an aluminum housing that lifts off for 360-degree access to the entire system. The housing also features a unique lattice pattern, which has already been referred to as a cheese grater, to maximize airflow and quiet operation.
![]()
Apple says the new Mac Pro provides over 300W of power and has a "state-of-the-art thermal architecture" to allow the processor to run "fully unconstrained all the time." This is a significant change from the previous Mac Pro, which Apple eventually admitted led it "into a bit of a thermal corner."
The new Mac Pro features Apple Afterburner, a new accelerator card that can decode up to three streams of 8K ProRes RAW video and 12 streams of 4K ProRes RAW video in real time, effectively eliminating proxy workflows.
![]()
Apple's marketing chief Phil Schiller:
Apple says the new Mac Pro starts at $5,999 in the United States with an eight-core Intel Xeon processor, 32GB of ECC RAM, AMD WX 7100 graphics, and 256GB of SSD storage and will be available to order in the fall.
Apple also introduced a new 32-inch 6K display named the Pro Display XDR that will also be available in the fall starting at $4,999.
![]()
More details can be found on Apple's new Mac Pro page on its website. While not advertised, the current Mac Pro remains available to purchase for now.
Article Link: Apple Reveals All-New Mac Pro With Up to 28-Core Processor and 1.5TB of RAM, Starting at $5,999
Oh come on with the SSD gouging. $5999 base with a 256G SSD is insulting.
I suspect everyone complaining about the price is not really at the high end Pro user who don't blink at prices for a computer workstation.
NopeAs to the stand, is that not for an alternative and optional stand? Yes it’s expensive for a stand but I’m sure the screen comes with a ‘basic’ stand.
The case design is very ugly, the cheese grater holes are too large, the handles and feet are silly looking, and the curves on the box are unnecessary.
This was the wrong direction for Apple to take. An entry level Mac under $1,000 with upgradable modular parts is the right direction.
This box is unobtainable for even pro users. I’ll be hanging on to my 2010 Mac Pro for many years to come. This is getting ridiculous.
I don't understand why people care about the headphone jack. People, this is NOT THE IMPORTANT PARA OF THE COMPUTERYeah who needs even MORE dongles. Sheesh, that's what we should be moving away from.
There are pro users and pro users. Clearly this is marketed to the pros that CAN afford it.I sent this post to Tim Cook; he will surely have egg on his face for not having you do his market research when this fails. Hopefully he will apologise to you personally at some point.
The problem with Apple is that they do not specify the exact models of their processors. If you check Xeon W data on Intel website, you won't find a model matching Apple specs (3.5GHz Intel Xeon W, 8 cores, 16 threads, Turbo Boost up to 4.0GHz, 24.5MB cache). Sometimes Apple seemingly request custom models from Intel just to make price comparisons impossible. Not all W processors are that expensive.