You want to share your root directory?I'd like to see iCloud become a lot more flexible. Being able to share directories / ...
You want to share your root directory?I'd like to see iCloud become a lot more flexible. Being able to share directories / ...
It's not like there's not standing for this already. Ever since Windows 2000 there's been a "Pro" version, even Windows 10 has a "Pro" skew,I hope the os is renamed macOSPro.
Would be fun watching the sad who get frothed up daily with a major case of the shakes when Apple uses "Pro" in product names, go ballistic with all-you-can-eat tiny moans when "Pro" is extended to the OS.
You want to share your root directory?
It's always interesting to think that Apple's testers are testing the new OS by visiting sites like this. Hello there, testers!
Apple should really use this as an opportunity to unify. iOS 11 and macOS 11
macOS has been on a slow decline from being pretty sophisticated to on par with iOS. It is pretty sad. I think one of the biggest has been DiskUtil which went from being a powerful utility to something you would find in iOS. There is the lack of modern OpenGL support, graphics drivers, the push from Apple to herd us to a closed ecosystem where you can only install applications from the App Store.How has it been dumbed down?
Annual new releases is too frequent; every year we go through the process of waiting for updates so important software is compatible. Some key programs (for example, Mathematica) is still not fully working with Sierra.
APFS is used for file revision, so you can role back to a previous version should a bug be found and incremental updating of apps, that is only updating only the files in an app that have changed as opposed to updating the entire app. This all goes on under the hood. A user will not notice a difference. Your iPhone/Mac will not be faster. How is this a highlight if you can't physically see the benefits, when exactly will you be excited?. If anything it's a high-light for non-geeks as Apple can say "updates will be faster and there's less chance of your iPhone/Mac crashing"So, 10.13 for the geeks among us the APFS will be the highlight.
A list of known trademarked names that have yet to be used: Redwood, Mammoth, California, Big Sur, Pacific, Diablo, Miramar, Rincon, Redtail, Condor, Grizzly, Farallon, Tiburon, Monterey, Skyline, Shasta, Mojave, Sequoia, Ventura, and Sonoma.
IMO, hopefully not. I know a fair chunk of us think we want this but think it through: do we want to dummy down MacOS to be compatible with what iDevices can do or complicate iOS to better fit what whole computers can do? Full unification would involve such compromises. I know some of us look at Surface and think a Mac version of that is what we want but chat with people who really use Surface and see if they think duality built in is as great as spun in marketing focused on very select benefits.
I don't think he meant 'convergence', which I agree would not be desirable, but rather naming synchronicity as inNo thanks. OSX has been dumbed down enough already. No unification necessary especially if that involves making OSX a closed ecosystem - downloading software only from the (Mac)AppStore.
Sierra was a very disappointing release. Hopefully 10.13 will be better.
Apple should really use this as an opportunity to unify. iOS 11 and macOS 11
Tim said no. That's that.Apple should really use this as an opportunity to unify. iOS 11 and macOS 11
I think that would be considered quite un-PC ironically.
Another un-PC name for it would be iPad Pro... get it?