So the fix is to use less screen.... well that's a new one!
That's how the Macbook Pro screens should have looked by default, plus rounded corners, minus a slightly smaller chin. It would have led to a more uniform design language across all Books and Pads and frankly, it also fits the overall design of the computer better which is quite bottom heavy which is further augmented by the too tiny bezels it now has by default.
If Apple suggests to modify apps for them to "work better with the notch", then they admit two things: first, that existing apps may work poorly with the notch. Second, that even if you modify the app, it will work "better", which is not a synonym for "fine".Apple notes that developers can update their app to work better with the notch, in which case the "scale to fit below built-in camera" setting no longer appears.
Yep, it's not a 'feature', it's a compromise. Haven't seen any comments about using full-screen mode with the new Macs - that would be an issue for me as I run a lot of apps that way. I wouldn't appreciate a chunk missing from the top of the screen, and no software tweak is going to fix that.If Apple suggests to modify apps for them to "work better with the notch", then they admit two things: first, that existing apps may work poorly with the notch. Second, that even if you modify the app, it will work "better", which is not a synonym for "fine".
It's nice to know that Apple admits the notch is a problem by design, and that it's not a matter of people disliking or "hating" the notch.
This is an absolute mess... per app settings... buggy menus... inconsistent behaviour... wasted space at the sides. Instead of the notch, they should have given these Macs a slightly thicker bezel at top and slightly taller display, and we could have had all the benefits of the new design with none of the downsides. Everyone would have been happy.
The new HP Elite Dragonfly Max has a 1440p webcam with much better quality than these new MacBooks as well as slim bezels, face tracking etc. Surely Apple should be able to match what HP has.
That doesn't solve the problem with menu items running out of space due to the notch.You can, of course, full screen the app to avoid the notch too.
Your point is?16:10 is a standard aspect ratio because it’s what Apple has used for 10+ years.
When a dev designs an app, they usually use a percentage to scale views.
If you know the resolution aspect ratio is 16:10, you set your timeline to 40% of the screen height.
When you change aspect ratios, the GUI doesn’t look proper since it wasn’t designed for that aspect ratio.
This is fine if you resize windows since you cannot possibly determine the users preferred scale size.
That’s why Apple using 16:10 in full screen mode makes sense. An app has to be in full screen mode anyway to utilize 16:10.
And cluttering the screen with buttons for every conceivable option is a solution? That's how you get Microsoft's ribbon.I understand what you’re saying. Apple could have just moved the safe area below the menu bar, instead of shrinking the entire desktop, which would effectively eliminate the notch. It’s still a possibility and showcased in the full screen mode.
My initial thought when I saw the notch was that they made the menu bar taller vertically.
If it’s not clear, I don’t like the Menu bar, other than to see the time and close an app.
I hate nothing more than fiddling around in plain text in Xcode just to refactor and indent some code.
I literally have spent hours of my life in Xcode and Android Studio looking for Menu bar options.
A completely pointless chart, as it mixes mobile operating systems with desktops.
When you have to have settings, dark modes and apps to appease the notch and yet you have floods of people on here defending it as “great design, well done Apple”.
It’s a massive design fail that interferes with UX and UI.
Lol, a terrible solution to a problem we didn't had before. Nice job.
And cluttering the screen with buttons for every conceivable option is a solution? That's how you get Microsoft's ribbon.
A shorter screen which would match the aspect ratio of all of Apple's notebook screens of the last 15+ years.The solution would have been a shorter screen. This is an elegant fix and simple enough. For 95% of apps the menu items won't interfere with / reach the dock nd for those that do we have this option.
Well trust me their market share is going to rise A LOT with these MBPs. The reviews are through the roof.It boggles my mind that in 2021 Apple released computers which can hid critical information (i.e., menu bar items) by default. Is all this screwing around really worth it for a tiny percentage increase in the total screen area?
With all the stupid decisions made by the Mac team over the years, it is easy to see why their market share is so low. It really is sad.
A shorter screen which would match the aspect ratio of all of Apple's notebook screens of the last 15+ years.
Or...hire some actual engineers from Dell:The solution would have been a shorter screen. This is an elegant fix and simple enough. For 95% of apps the menu items won't interfere with / reach the dock nd for those that do we have this option.