Alright, I think the keynote thi ps year will be 10 minutes, tops.
Maybe 11 if apple keeps their fancy graphics.
Yeah, that's why they made it 2 hours.
http://www.apple.com/live/event.ics
Last edited:
Alright, I think the keynote thi ps year will be 10 minutes, tops.
Maybe 11 if apple keeps their fancy graphics.
Can someone chime in on whether or not Google ever established partnerships with major stores and credit card companies for Android?
I'm just wondering if this a new thing or will Apple simply frame it as doing NFC 'right' and 'secure'.
No it's fine.
I just think it's sad that the western world is so far behind the times with using your phone for payments, even if small payments, when some poor 3rd work countries have been using it for ages even with dumb phones
This payment system has to launch worldwide. They can't afford to roll this out in America first. I mean we are still waiting for iTunes Radio n the UK
Now I can use NFC to transfer pics from my sony full frame camera now. Sweet
The Fry "SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY" picture will have to be updated. Cash will be obsolete.
I, for one, am thrilled about the NFC addition. I was highly disappointed when it didn't make the iPhone 5 generation.
This payment system has to launch worldwide. They can't afford to roll this out in America first. I mean we are still waiting for iTunes Radio n the UK
Highly misleading rumor reporting. The NFC stuff in the linked story seems to be about Disney and McDonald's, not Apple. This story is actually about Apple expanding their iBeacon technology.
I've yet to see anything that would indicate Apple has a legitimate interest in NFC. What's more, implementing NFC goes against logic, since Apple is pushing their own competing (and superior) standard based on the much more popular Bluetooth LE. Anything you can do with NFC, you can do with iBeacons, better. Putting NFC chips in everything would be a waste of precious space and battery life.
I know NFC is popular with some folks here, which is why MacRumors keeps fanning those flames, but seriously, guys, look at the two technologies, and explain to me why Apple would ever, ever want to use NFC instead of iBeacons?
Apple has $150B that would say otherwise. They can afford basically anything.
The technology is far more widespread and useful now than it was when the iPhone 5 debuted. Apple didn't include it because they believed the technology not to be worth while at the time.
We're waiting for iTunes radio in Canada and we live next door...
You can transfer pics right now with the play memories app. This happens over wifi, the NFC just makes it easier by creating the wifi connection and launching the app for you (on android(.
On iOS you have to start the app on the camera, go to settings on your phone and connect to the cameras network, then launch the app.
There is no guarantee apple will allow NFC to be used that way unfortunately. They might really lock it down.
I need no meme images, let me just say... shut up. Period. NFC; Noone Flippin Cares.![]()
I know about playmemories app, was hoping for something a little simpler such as NFC, but your right, they may lock it down where regular NFC connections won't work. Hope not though
----------
Actually some people do care to have NFC.
Haven't had NFC in phone myself, but the touch to pay in the UK is useful - it's so much quicker in queues to buy things especially if you don't need a receipt - chip and pin is cheque writing slow by comparison.
It's an ease of use that just notches your expectation of transactions.
Nice twist on logic there
So Apple did not wish to lead, so now they will only wait till others have established a standard, and only then they will be late to the table and implement something themselves.
That's strange as I usually hear that Apple are leading, ahead of everyone else, and set a standard, putting it in place then everyone else catches up.