Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You seem quite sure of that. I wouldn't at all be shocked if we see

  • M1 mini continues to exist at $699
  • M2 mini starts at $899
  • M2 Pro mini starts at $1499

You are right, no one would be shocked to see a M2 mini with unusably little RAM / storage at a fictive pricepoint.
 
"Oh you want Pro level Apple Silicon and every other hardware aspect that comes along with that? $1999 please"

- Apple.
Except it won’t be that… at all.
It’ll be an M2pro in the body of a product only meant to support an M2.
It also will have less ports than the Mac Studio, and none of the benefits of a MacBook Pro, like a built in 120hz mini LED display, keyboard, trackpad, battery, WebCam…
If you think there’s no point to this product, because the Mac Studio is better, you’re giving apple a reason to create it. To try to get more people to buy the Mac Studio.
Also, because of its lack of screen, keyboard, trackpad, speakers, camera, battery, I don’t think there’s going to be that many people choosing between this and a MacBook.
You are literally arguing that Apple won’t do what Apple‘s CEO is known for doing.
 
What company do you think this is? Lmao.
Apple, the company currently selling five different iPads, eight different iPhones, six different Apple Watches, two different TV boxes, four different AirPods, four different laptops…
Also, May I point out that the same argument was used right before the Mac Studio launched?
“ Apple would never introduce a computer between the Mac mini and the Mac Pro, it would cannibalize both.”
“Apple would never introduce a cheaper Apple Watch, it would cannibalize older Watch sales.”
“Apple would never give the iPad Air the M1, it would kill iPad Pro sales.”
The list can go on and on and on and on.
Every time Apple restructures a line-up people talk about what they will and won’t do, and usually they surprise.
The iPad Air 5 was rumored to get the A15, it actually got the M1.
So no, a M2pro Mac Mini is not impossible.
Things are weird right now, the industry is on a decline, but Apple’s Mac shipments have just gone up and up and up.
And it appears the way that they are going about this to continue the shipments increase is by trying to hit every single product price point possible.
M2pro Mac Mini? Sure.
15 inch MacBook Air? Why not.
 
I wonder if the 2018 intel Mac mini will disappear or remain/be updated?
Likely would be replaced by either an M2 with 24GB RAM or an M2 Pro with up to 32GB RAM.

Unless they want to keep an Intel box around for a while longer for people who really need to run Intel software (like Windows)
 
Last edited:
Yet, I have two customers just in the past week who are desperate to find printers, and there isn't a single one on the market that I can recommend with a clear conscience.

It'd be nice to have at least one printer on the market that wasn't absolute crap?

Just because you and I live in a comfortable bubble where we don't print much, if at all, doesn't mean that that's actually, you know, reality for everyone?
If they don’t need color, just get a B/W Brother laser. They are trouble-free, low cost, a cartridge last forever. We found that we rarely printed in color and the ink jets were expensive crap.
 
Things are weird right now, the industry is on a decline, but Apple’s Mac shipments have just gone up and up and up.
And it appears the way that they are going about this to continue the shipments increase is by trying to hit every single product price point possible.
M2pro Mac Mini? Sure.
15 inch MacBook Air? Why not.
TL;DR:
  • Apple following in the footsteps of Windows OEMs, like Lenovo and Dell.
 
I bought an M1 24" iMac last week, so it'll include the M2 24" iMac. I hope you appreciate my sacrifice, as there was no way they'd do it if I hadn't made that purchase...
I do appreciate your sacrifice. I have a similar role with Garmin, they hold of new watch releases until a week after I've purchased the older model.
 
Likely would be replaced by either an M2 with 24GB RAM or an M2 Pro with up to 32GB RAM.

Unless they want to keep an Intel box around for a while longer for people who really need to run Intel software (like Windows)
We had thoughts about retaining the intel Mac Pro even after a AS Mac Pro gets announced, the same would apply for an intel Mac mini. Businesses have a lot of IT managed/licensed software and their platform retentions hinge on that.

Yes I of course could see Apple dropping intel Macs, but then that flies against their comments that they would continue to support them for years back when they started the transition discussion.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
The much delayed iPhone 14 Mini, built on 3nm process so as to leave more room for a much improved battery. 😉
 
So first the MBP was going to be October, then it was going to be March, then it was delayed into second quarter, and now it’s tomorrow?
 
AirPods Max not available on Amazon’s Apple Store in the UK…an upcoming refresh?
 
Where is the M2 iMac? LOL Apple is really all over the place lately.
Back when some were asking about that, it was compared to earlier requests for a M1 Pro iMac. In that comparison the M2 only buys you slightly faster CPU/GPU performance and a 8GB RAM more. where as M1 Pro was double the unified memory bandwidth (100 GB/s versus 200 GB/s), supporting 32 GB RAM along with 10/16 vs 8/8 CPU/GPU cores. If Apple is going to update the M1 iMac they should go beyond a base M2 otherwise is just like the M1 vs M2 iPad Pro comparison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ratspg
Oh no I just bought a...
Yep, I've been buying Macs since 1994 and this is the same pain point Mac users deal with.
Unless the M2 is 100x faster and can produce gold, I am confident your most recent M1 will work as well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.