This! The "Johny" video is my most favourite part of a product launch. There's just something with his English accent that make me wanna buy whatever he's describing.
Why would you spend 1k on a iwatch that will still require a phone for the functionality?
----------
never will happen and you will need 2 separate phone numbers. Dream on.
Diversity is good.
I'm glad Apple is giving choices as longs as their product line doesn't become too confused.
Like the iPad line: Selling 4 variants of the two models and then two older models. I kind of miss Apples simple 1 or 2 product lineups.
I would only consider buying one of those iWatches if they look like an actual watch and not like those redic mockups that make it look like an iPod Nano on your wrist.
Can you imagine wearing one of these during a business meeting? embarrassing
Then why not just buy a real watch? Just as embarrassing would be ones watch face lighting up every time they got a notification of some sort.
Haven't Apple been taking steps to protect the name 'iWatch' in various countries?
I wonder if it will tell time?
pssst... skeuomorphism is dead.Anyone else like the mock up that looks like a real watch better?
![]()
No way. iWatch won't have a touchscreen, it'll have a 3D beamy thing giving a hologram effect like off Star Wars, all which is fully interactive. This means if you need more real-estate or add new features, it's not a problem; one of the main advantages when the iPhone didn't come with a physical keyboard. Otherwise there's no advantage to a small touchscreen; it won't add any functionality to the ecosystem. It won't be as good as an iPhone/iPad for browsing, making calls, or anything else. It'll be redundant.
My money's firmly on Apple popping in some technology 5-10 years ahead of their competitors' pipelines. If they perfect it they could easily have it running in tandem with an iPhone to make calls (much like OS X 10.10 will), without the limitations of the Galaxy Gear (crappy sluggish interface and tiny screen).
Image
A lot of people are calling this product the iWatch, as if it's a completely new product category which needs a new name - but here's a thought - what if it's actually called the iPod?
In other words, this product line is actually going to be a major rethinking of what the iPod actually is? Most people now buy iPhones instead of the iPod touch etc. Apple hasn't really talked about iPods in their events for a long while.
So, calling the new product the "iPod" would leverage the brand name that everybody knows and loves already.
It's just that instead of the iPods of old which go in your pocket, Apple is basically saying that that the iPhone is now your pocketable device - and that the iPod is going to be reborn in a different form factor.
We will then see the end of the iPod classic etc.
It's called... a joke. (obviously not a good one if it wasn't seen as one)
pssst... skeuomorphism is dead.![]()
Can you imagine wearing one of these during a business meeting? embarrassing
Businessboy, much? There is more than Business meetings in this world. Those who have to do these ultra important meetings have the money to buy some 'use for a certain meeting only, 10k US$ and up wristwatch' for the meeting to not embarrass themselves.
It better look like a normal wrist watch, because all those geeky smart watches out there just suck. Even the Moto360, it is really fat.
God, I hope it looks better than that geeky mock up!
Why not just duct tape a shuffle to your wrist?![]()
I would only consider buying one of those iWatches if they look like an actual watch and not like those redic mockups that make it look like an iPod Nano on your wrist.
Can you imagine wearing one of these during a business meeting? embarrassing