Nothing wrong with liking different things. It's called preference....normal human trait.one speaker. small battery. but that thing has its fans.
Nothing wrong with liking different things. It's called preference....normal human trait.one speaker. small battery. but that thing has its fans.
Or they could talk to some of the competitors... but the Chinese want the iPhone to exist so they can always be quite a few steps ahead of Apple...The only way to get around camera bump is to make the whole phone thicker/heavier ...
Or they could talk to some of the competitors... but the Chinese want the iPhone to exist so they can always be quite a few steps ahead of Apple...![]()
Well, China is a large country with a population of approximately 1.4 billion, which is about 4.2 times that of the USA, and it has many technological companies beyond just Xiaomi.Either the competitors (like Xiaomi) also have camera bumps or the ones that do not have one are either thicker or use lower quality glasses.
Steve could read the room. Tim can't. As demonstrated with the last few flagship flops...Wasn't Steve's thing "give them what they want before they know they want it"?
I never said Xiaomi is the only company. I said that the others have either thicker phones or are using lower quality glasses.Well, China is a large country with a population of approximately 1.4 billion, which is about 4.2 times that of the USA, and it has many technological companies beyond just Xiaomi.
If you say so. I'm still watching their new product launch on YouTube from 10 hours ago. I won’t mention the name of the company, but I've seen their earlier products, and they are not thick. The phone on the left in the screenshot is something you'd recognise very well, allowing you to see the difference. Apple Intelligence might identify it by circling it, I suppose.I said that the others have either thicker phones or are using lower quality glasses.
I get it. You change foldable phones like normal people change underwear. Like I said, cool, go on.Clearly you haven't read the entire discussion.
based on what? apple cutting production by 1 million?This is no longer interesting—it's a dead phone.
one speaker. small battery. but that thing has its fans.
And that is your unsolicited opinion. It’s ok though. Apple has options for everyone. Just because an option does not work for one does not make it a bad option.It could reiterate that people don't necessarily want thin, this was an unsolicited Apple obsession. I think people would rather have faster speeds, more functionality, or longer battery life.
3) almost selling out when you make 600What's more impressive...
1) Selling out when you make 10 pcs of something
2) Selling half your stock when you make 1000
I couldn’t return mine fast enough. The OS is not designed for that size phone or screen. Nothing worked right, even in Apple’s own drop downs and dialogue boxes.Because it was the best phone Apple ever made. It was the perfect size and weight, and only needed ProMotion and a telephoto lens to round it out.
Misaligned parts?iPhone Air is built like a Tesla on the outside with the interior features of a Hyundai Accent!
It does though. Whether one product succeeds impacts the direction other products take.What’s strange in this topic is that some people actually seem happy to see the Air (supposedly) fail, even though its success doesn’t affect them in any way.
Very strange.
The crippled camera system is what makes this a no go. You are paying more for less. I would get this for my wife, but with a single lens camera that lacks some of the focusing features, it’s a bad downgrade from her 16 even if it’s lighter with a bigger screen.
It’s like the VW Golf R and the “euro” package, 10% more money to REMOVE things. Yes the car is slightly lighter so it probably gets 0.1 sec faster 0-60, but why so much extra money to take out more expensive features?
Do you think Apple shouldn't go for lighter, thinner, better ergonomics, sexier? Are we doomed to continually bloated phones until the next thing that replaces them? I sure hope not. That wouldn't be innovative for the industry.It could reiterate that people don't necessarily want thin, this was an unsolicited Apple obsession. I think people would rather have faster speeds, more functionality, or longer battery life.
People see the single lens 16e and the Air and wonder if it’s worth $400 to be thinner with a somewhat bigger screen. Not everyone understands the specs, especially when the upgraded specs of the 17 line offer nothing practical to many people.Price vs. Perception. It costs more than the regular 17 but performs worse. The single camera makes it automatically perceived as inferior to the average consumer so what’s the logic behind paying $200 more for less?
The biggest plus of the Air is that it’s the best looking phone in the lineup. But looks alone don’t warrant the price.