I wonder if they reduced the bezels if they could make a 17" MacBook Pro nearly the size of the current 15" ones? As I posted the other day, it would be neat if Apple just consolidated it like this: 12" and 15" MacBooks, 15" and 17" MacBook Pros. Get rid of the Air and add an extra port or two to the MacBook and call it a day. I mean, after all, the original Air expanded ports over time.
With the A9X having a better Geekbench score than the fastest MacBook (5466 vs. 5284), and Apple being rumored to acquire Imagination Technologies, I'm looking forward to seeing a MacBook/iPad crossover device. Apple uses "A" for their iOS devices, "M" for motion co-processors and "Hey Siri", and "S" for Apple Watch. I wonder if they would come out with another chip line that is the ultimate in performance.
Think three A9X cores on a single die using a 10nm process, Geekbenching around 16,000, in a MacBook Pro/iPad Pro 13" hybrid device. Think about using the smart connector like a Thunderbolt 3 connector to attach to a keyboard base. You could store a discrete graphics card, extra battery, and extra ports inside the keyboard part. When it snaps on it clocks up the processor and has access to the additional graphics resources and USB 3.0 speed ports for accessories. Apple has a patent on an OS that quickly switches from touch-based to mouse-based. When you dock, the display and apps morph to being a mouse-friendly desktop OS. Unification across the lines will happen eventually. And providing an SDK for (more easily) scaling iOS apps for the desktop could really help the Mac gain more market traction and help Apple achieve growth in the enterprise which, as Tim said the other day, is ripe for expansion with tons of users using really old PCs.
Everyone keeps saying that Apple's growth isn't sustainable. A hybrid device that isn't rushed and well thought out could bridge the gap to other markets that are ripe for growth. Or maybe it's just my wishful thinking. I think that Apple could figure out how to do it properly, and if they are then they are certainly taking their time. Such a machine would be really expensive to start out, but I think costs would come down over time. I know I'd easily drop $3000 on a machine like that—one that is an iPad Pro and MacBook Pro in one with great performance? That supports the Apple Pencil? It would be fantastic. Apple has been doing a lot of things lately that people never thought they would do. A stylus? Another 4" iPhone? A new iPhone with new, fast components for only $399? iPad Pro? A phablet? A watch? A $17,000 watch? Maybe even a car and removing the headphone jack? Anything is possible. Heck, it wasn't even long ago when people said they would never make an iPad Mini. Steve was famous for saying they wouldn't make something and then making it.
I really want Apple to offer a laptop with an LTE connection.
It seems bizarre to me that the iPad has had cellular antennas from the beginning, 6 years ago now, but Apple has never given that to their laptops, even as an optional add-on, throughout the many revisions that they've had to their laptop line over the years.
If Apple put cellular connections in their computers, I could just cut Comcast entirely. AT&T's LTE is faster and cheaper than my Comcast broadband, but because tethering is less than convenient, I still mostly use broadband for when my computers need to connect to the internet.
Ultra-thin like the Retina MacBook means logic board soldered SSD's, just like the Retina MacBook has. You better have a backup because there ain't going to be any data recovery from a soldered on SSD. Heck, even if the SSD is fine but the logic board fails, the SSD goes down with it.
However, the June-July timeframe seems quite realistic. We should see the HQ-class Skylakes until then and also, AMD Polaris might be in production as well. A 6770HQ+Polaris10 would be a very sweet upgrade indeed.
This forum..., yesterday people were moaning there was no Mac related news and how dated the hardware is - now it's Apple can't make decent laptops anyway/it'll be under powered/who needs thin? People are never satisfied it seems.
Personally I'm buzzing, my 2012 unibody pro is still going strong despite people in this thread claiming it apparently should've had heat-related failure by now. Would love to move to a retina screen and faster GPU.
Now to decide between a new Pro in June, or take the jump for a 9.7" iPad Pro next month...
if they released the same computer as the macbook air 13" only with a 1080p IPS display and even better battery life I would be sold.
Apple cannot make pro level laptops anymore. Their fetish with ever thinner cases means they are using substandard components and heat profiles guaranteed to destroy the chipsets after a couple of years.
Pretty much pro laptop made by Apple in the past 5 years have all had heat related failures
And with that, you've missed the whole point of Apple's unified hardware/software philosophy.
Maybe try calling Dell in India for a quote?
Even they have learned from Apple!
lol, wish upon a star! GL you will need it.Don't do this to me, Apple. Please. If you really make that thin of a MacBook Pro in a 15" form with Skylake, I will throw all of my money at you. Please include some USB 3.1 and C ports, keep the MagSafe, keep the battery life, force touch, and I will be satisfied with this year with Apple.
EDIT: And most of all, no butterfly keyboard
They are starting to confuse me with so many options... I really think they need to focus on keeping things simple.
Certainly many Apple laptops have had higher than normal rates of failure, but if I recall correctly, it always had to do with the way Apple used nVidia discreet GPUs. More likely, nVidia fudged the numbers a bit in their spec sheets and integration guides that say how hot the chip gets, and thus Apple didn't account for it properly. We know Apple likes to push chips to their limit, and doesn't leave much in the way of error or safety factors.
However, other than the few nVidia examples, I don't recall any heat related failures at unusual rates.