Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Seems fair to me. Why would anyone NEED to replace their battery twice in a single year anyway? They're already replacing the battery at a discounted price even if it passes diagnostic.

People could abuse it if they come replacing the battery every 6 months just because they're paranoid that their device has slowed down.

Hmmm, I wonder why people are paranoid? Apple's actions maybe? When a company loses trust from their customers, they need to earn it back. That has a cost. Dealing with a few paranoid people the right way might be the price to get the trust back.
 
You must also have an original Apple battery in your phone to get it replaced. Apple will not replace a 3rd party battery for safety issues. They also will not put in a new battery if your phone is missing a battery, but they couldn't give me a reason why not.



Because you have to exchange your old battery. Apple not only wants them recycled properly, but they also don't want scammers to think they can take out a perfectly good battery and go in an get a new one to resell, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
I'm not talking about my personal issues. I'm not having battery issues, but I still recognize the problem others are having (my mother being one of them, but she's getting her battery replaced soon). Your "this isn't a problem to me so I don't see why it's a problem to others" mentality is not helping anyone. It's just silly. And calling people you don't agree with children just makes you sound childish. It's possible to have a discussion without resorting to that.

I’m just saying in the grand scheme of things you would think that someone has been murdered from the reaction from some folks about this issue.

You can complain all you want though
Just know no one on this board is Apple and posting the same thing over and over again about the battery ad nauseam is not going to do anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
But the optional trigger would be "throttle phone under load" or "have phone restart"

That's not really an option, why would you want the phone to freeze and restart?

That's just an extreme statement. I am still using an iPhone 6 Plus that was experiencing the shutdown issue prior to 10.2.1 BUT it would only happen when I was in the 30% battery range, and it NEVER happened above 50% ... and my phone was still running what I considered to be fast/responsive.

Since the power management was introduced my phone is slow all the time (and has gotten slower over time as I'm sure my battery continues to degrade). I'd turn it off in a second if I was given the choice, even now. Between home, car, and work, I can easily keep my phone above a 50% charge. ALSO, my phone is slow even when on wall power, you're throttled no matter what because of battery capacity. When I'm on wall power I'd toggle it off for sure.

That's the thing, given the option people can do what they want given their situation. If I'm around a 60% battery and I know I won't be home for hours, maybe I switch it on, but it should be my choice, much like Apple gives people the "Power Saving Mode" choice now.
 
Hmmm, I wonder why people are paranoid? Apple's actions maybe? When a company loses trust from their customers, they need to earn it back. That has a cost. Dealing with a few paranoid people the right way might be the price to get the trust back.


The cost includes inconveniencing other people who have to wait for service, etc. The cost includes waste of staff time and battery, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
I’m just saying in the grand scheme of things you would think that someone has been murdered from the reaction from some folks about this issue.
No, you're just exaggerating to make you feel better about where you stand on people complaining about a perfectly valid issue. People have a right to be upset by this. Just as you have the right to be bothered by the fact that people are upset by this. That doesn't make them crybabies just because to you it's a non-issue.

You can complain all you want though
Yes ... that's what this forum is for.

Just know no one on this board is Apple and posting the same thing over and over again about the battery ad nauseam is not going to do anything.
It did do something ... 26 lawsuits are in effect and the issue was made public by everyone, leading Apple to offer $29 battery replacements. So enough people complained and took action to make a difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Burger Thing
Went to the Apple store for my scheduled battery replacement. My 6S shuts down at about 40% battery consistently. They ran diagnostics and said my battery was still in good shape! Interesting. I kindly asked them to replace it anyways, so I am waiting for them to get more batteries in stock then I will make another appointment and trip to the Apple store. Not sure why they scheduled me for a battery replacement when they didn’t have replacements. Apple sure is going down hill

The goal is to get you in the store and hope you buy a new phone instead of waiting for a battery replacement. That's why the policy for shipping the phone to Apple is even worse.

Apple also doesn't document anywhere to state the warranty on the battery replacement is only 3 months if you manage to jump through all the hoops to qualify.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: apolloa
No, you're just exaggerating to make you feel better about where you stand on people complaining about a perfectly valid issue. People have a right to be upset by this. Just as you have the right to be bothered by the fact that people are upset by this. That doesn't make them crybabies just because to you it's a non-issue.


Yes ... that's what this forum is for.


It did do something ... 26 lawsuits are in effect and the issue was made public by everyone, leading Apple to offer $29 battery replacements. So enough people complained and took action to make a difference.

Complaining on this board did not create lawsuits and if you think that there is no comment.

I stand by what I said earlier that the outrage over this battery issue does seem to be on the same level with reactions that someone had been killed from some posters.

I’ve seen stuff posts about politics and racism over in the political forum on MR garner a less emotional response than this battery issue. So I do stand by what I said earlier however I can disagree with you as you can with me
 
They should just **** off slowing down phones. I'd rather my phone turn off because of a **** battery (which has never happened) then I choose what to do about it rather than apple slowing down my phone then charge me to fix it.

That is the thing. Since it is not happening to you yet, you prefer that your phone shuts down instead of being throttled. But if it would happen to you, I think you'll change your thinking about the issue.
 
Since the power management was introduced my phone is slow all the time (and has gotten slower over time as I'm sure my battery continues to degrade). I'd turn it off in a second if I was given the choice, even now.

Have you had the battery checked to see if it's at EOL? If it's not, then the issues you're experiencing aren't likely to be related to the battery or the throttling feature at all. You'd be better off focusing on the standard troubleshooting steps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
As long as you remember that the only thing you're going to gain in that situation is capacity, not performance. The max voltage, nominal voltage, and the way voltage drops during discharge won't be any different in a brand new battery as in an 85% capacity battery.

MAYBE.
It seems that there is throttling happening even in cases where the in-store "Genius" deems the battery A.O.K.
 
Has Apple announced the intent to make the power management options visible, with toggles so users can opt to use them or not? Put in a new battery is nice but if the same stuff comes back into play a little further down the road, wouldn't we rather have the option of flipping a toggle in iOS instead of having to then buy a new battery over and over? I would.

Proactive Note (to the defenders/apologists): such an option forces nothing on you. If Apple has it exactly right "as is" from your perspective, the OPTIONAL toggle(s) for OTHERS to flip or not flip would have zero effect on your experience.

I think if you read between the lines, Apple will install the throttling on ALL iOS devices, and they will claim the get out jail card is the fact the OS will tell you when your battery needs changing and it’s performance is being throttled, you will NOT however be given any options to override this and you will need to buy a new battery to resolve it.

That’s more or less what they have said, plus Apple doesn’t like giving users a choice, they have been trying desperately to block third party repairs over the last few years what with the finger print scanner block, and that was only overturned after government pressure.
In fact we could have ended up in the situation where Apple deliberately slows your phone down, and you can not get it replaced by them even if you pay, and if a third party replaces it your finger print scanner won’t work anymore and your phone could be locked for good...

That is the scenario we nearly ended up in here....

You just wait till those 1 grand phones and iPad Pros are getting their performance throttled...
 
I think if you read between the lines, Apple will install the throttling on ALL iOS devices, and they will claim the get out jail card is the fact the OS will tell you when your battery needs changing and it’s performance is being throttled, you will NOT however be given any options to override this and you will need to buy a new battery to resolve it.

You just wait till those 1 grand phones and iPad Pros are getting their performance throttled...

Well there are a lot of folks like myself who get a new one every year via our carrier financing programs. So we won’t have them long enough to be effected.
 
Complaining on this board did not create lawsuits and if you think that there is no comment.
I didn't say that ... but enough people complained online and in enough places to make these lawsuits happen. If nobody complained or said anything ... nothing would have happened. And if you can't understand that ... then there is no comment.

I stand by what I said earlier that the outrage over this battery issue does seem to be on the same level with reactions that someone had been killed from some posters.
It isn't. You know it ... I know it ... and you're just trying to ruffle feathers for the sake of ruffling feathers.

I’ve seen stuff about politics and racism over in the political forum on MR garner a less emotional response than this battery issue. So I do stand by what I said earlier however I can disagree with you as you can with me
Then why are you in this thread if you can't stand it? That's like holding your hand to a stove and complaining that it's hot. Just take your hand off the stove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas
How about any PC or windows machine? Ever use one after 3.5 years?

Google Android battery issues. I owned a Note that shut itself down constantly with 50% charge. Now I know why...but guess what? Didn't know why then because Samsung told me I was out of my 1 year warranty.

Apple will get you fixed up for $29 on a 3.5 year old device, replacing something that by definition degrades over time. Pretty good if you ask me.

You mean Notebooks? My top of the line MacBook Pro’s battery did not survive longer than any portable PC I owned before.

Anyway I was speaking phones.

And Apple will get me fixed for something they ****ed up and I already bought a new device over. And they still charge me for something which should be cheaper all the time. And it would **** me again in a year because of Apple's bad electronics.

Thanks for nothing.
 
So
You still don’t get it. A toggle doesn’t make sense from Apple’s perspective because this isn’t something most consumers are going to have enough information on to make an informed decision about whether they want to prioritise stability or performance.

The whole point of Apple is that they take the tough choices out of the hands of the consumers and we trust them to make the right decisions for us. And as with any singular decision forced upon its users, some people are going to be on the losing end more than others. But this works for many users because for them, the decision made by Apple is going to better than whatever they end up making anyways, and they save themselves the time and hassle of agonising over which decision to make.

If you don’t like this “my way or the highway” attitude of Apple, then maybe the Apple ecosystem isn’t the right one for you. It’s like going to a French restaurant and complaining that they don’t serve cheeseburgers.
So Apple fanatics are just uneducated followers? Takes the hard choices out? I think most people could understand a message that says your battery is failing and needs replacement.

I don’t know what to say to you. Apple can do no wrong no in your eyes. If Apple Was caught stealing from the poor I have the feeling that you would come up with a reason why it’s ok.
 
I'm ok without their input on how I spend my own money thanks...
And Apple is cool with you thinking the battery is bad when it has plenty of battery health left. Then they get to explain to you how software has affects on battery life :) Plenty of people that are going in because they got scared on the news about their iPhone batteries have brand new phones and don’t understand what is even going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
I agree. Apple has never come to such a quick "deal" for everyone, and that alone makes it fishy. Remember, "you are holding it wrong"? I believe the real issue is a design problem, and the resolution probably should be a recall. Devices should not become unstable when the battery ages. I've never seen an electronic device behave that way... the battery life just gets shorter. This $29 thing is an attempt to appease people to back off the lawsuits.
Have you owned any other smartphone other than an iPhone? Do you realize how many hours you put in on a phone every single day for years and then now we’re like “oh somethings fishy here, they better recall my phone”.
[doublepost=1515436470][/doublepost]
Because you have to exchange your old battery. Apple not only wants them recycled properly, but they also don't want scammers to think they can take out a perfectly good battery and go in an get a new one to resell, etc.
100%
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
Funny thing: before Apple implemented this "solution" (apparently) in iOS version 10.2.1, I don't remember thousands of posts about people's phones crashing as you imply. ...snip
Here's a start:
February 2016 iPhone 6s turning off at 10-20%
Strangely, complaints right after release:
October 2015: Some iPhone 6s Owners Seeing Their Phones Randomly Shut Off
Reddits from 2015, 2016
Reddit: iPhone shutting down

Google search is good at helping people remember.
 
Last edited:
That's just an extreme statement. I am still using an iPhone 6 Plus that was experiencing the shutdown issue prior to 10.2.1 BUT it would only happen when I was in the 30% battery range, and it NEVER happened above 50% ... and my phone was still running what I considered to be fast/responsive.

Since the power management was introduced my phone is slow all the time (and has gotten slower over time as I'm sure my battery continues to degrade). I'd turn it off in a second if I was given the choice, even now. Between home, car, and work, I can easily keep my phone above a 50% charge. ALSO, my phone is slow even when on wall power, you're throttled no matter what because of battery capacity. When I'm on wall power I'd toggle it off for sure.

That's the thing, given the option people can do what they want given their situation. If I'm around a 60% battery and I know I won't be home for hours, maybe I switch it on, but it should be my choice, much like Apple gives people the "Power Saving Mode" choice now.
Do you think your battery health is stable? Your phone shut off at 30% prior to 10.2.1, now you see it being slow around 50%? So, 9 months later (270 cycles) later and you’re wondering why it’s affecting higher percentages. Just get your battery changed. Had you not been on 10.2.1 your phone would be consistently shutting down and you’d go in and get a new battery because that’s what you do with devices that have sealed lithium-ion batteries.
[doublepost=1515436785][/doublepost]
The goal is to get you in the store and hope you buy a new phone instead of waiting for a battery replacement. That's why the policy for shipping the phone to Apple is even worse.

Apple also doesn't document anywhere to state the warranty on the battery replacement is only 3 months if you manage to jump through all the hoops to qualify.
This is entirely false. Everyone is coming in the store the first week of the replacement program and wondering why they cannot get a battery immediately. The goal is not to sell you a new phone. And the 3 month warranty on all repairs is not only clearly stated in every work authorization document you receive and the terms/agreements, but you are also told by your technician it is 90 days 75% of the time.
[doublepost=1515436912][/doublepost]
MAYBE.
It seems that there is throttling happening even in cases where the in-store "Genius" deems the battery A.O.K.
Throttling as in your phone is slow, and the technician is telling you the diagnostic shows that your battery health is fine. Would you rather them lie and say it is the battery and have you waste money on it when the diagnostic shows it is fine? Maybe you have used the same iOS build for 6 years and never started fresh. Maybe you close out of all of your apps 24/7 and then wonder why the phone is buggy and slow. Maybe you force restart your phone once a day. If the battery is okay, there is another reason that your device is being slow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.