Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How much of the slow pace of Mac Pro updates is because it's made in the USA?

Probably none. The powrmacs were built in the US for a very long time and were pretty competitive most of the time. In fact they even used to have motherboards made in the US.

It's more a problem with intel being slow to update their pro platforms. The Mac Pro is using an x79 based Xeon platform and the x99 doesn't really help much with usb3 or thunderbolt3.

Still they could have done something :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan
See? Wonder if all the whining will stop. Apple has calmed some nerves hopefully. I think they're being very generous by " pre-announcing" a Mac Pro that only accounts for a SINGLE PERCENTAGE of Mac business.
 
Why would you ever buy into Apple's Mac Pro ecosystem? Remember 4 years ago when Phil Schiller stood on stage and said, "Can't innovate my ass..." and then Apple proceeds to forget about the Mac Pro for 4 years. People's memory is so short around here.

What people should be looking for are signs from apple that it is a sustained campaign with regular updates in the hopper year in and year out. Otherwise why would you ever buy into the "Pro" ecosystem? Apple has proven that they really don't care about you as a Pro user. Why would you give your money?

fa8d1b2fffe849c8f4e5ad8ca3ab6013.jpg
 
I've responded to a few naysayers on here with the argument "The lack of Mac Pro updates isn't apathy". Here is confirmation that I was right.

Still waiting for a major announcement that proves the naysayers are right and that "all Tim Cook cares about are profits".

Well, maybe so, but it will have been 5 years since meaningful attention to the Mac Pro line, which could be perceived as some form or definition of apathy. Nonetheless, they at least have now said something sufficiently specific, other than "great products in the pipeline".
 
"Immense blowback..." from a single digit user base..., right...
It's a single-digit user base now. Because of all the people disappointed and not buying the 2013 model (such as me).

It's more a problem with intel being slow to update their pro platforms.
No, that's not even a flimsy excuse. The GPUs weren't even cutting-edge in 2013; they could have been updated multiple times since then.

--Eric
 
Regarding iMacs, Schiller also said that new iMacs are in the works, slated for release some time this year (no specifics other than “this year”), including “configurations of iMac specifically with the pro customer in mind and acknowledging that our most popular desktop with pros is an iMac.”

It's only more popular because of how horribly you neglected the Mac Pro. Notebook users are gonna notebook use anyway.

But what you did to the Mac Pro, making it impossible to change the videocards ever, putting an uncommon port for the hard drive (can't buy a 960pro 2TB and stick it in there, and it's only recently that you can buy an OWC drive and do so), just one hard drive internal for a pro desktop while using gumstick format ssd anyway, and then not giving new options as technology moves on was just dumb.

Borderline criminal, but definitely dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sunwukong
You can't be serious. It took them four years to realize their can was a mistake and they've been working hard on a replacement all this time because of their love and dedication to their computer customers?

Horsecrap.

They screwed the pooch with their can design. They have had immense blowback about it since the beginning from the very people who didn't request or need such innovation, but of course "we just weren't ready for their brave new world."

The truth is they haven't been working on anything, and for whatever reason, they've had a religious moment where they have realized they were wrong. Now, in an attempt to put their finger in the dam, they've let this update "leak" with Phil "can't admit we were wrong my ass" Schiller having to eat crow. Tell me, if they're so proud of this why no big announcement on Apple.com? Where's the fanfare and trumpets announcing the arrival of the new Mac Pro King?

And now...on top of the four years you believe they've been so diligently at work on the new Quantum Mr. Fusion powered Mac Pro...we have to wait yet another year?

They haven't even started working on it until NOW. From Phil Schiller in this article, "and that’ll take longer than this year to do."

Again...Horsecrap.


Why aren't they making some huge announcement? did you bother reading the article???? The Mac Pro accounts for a SINGLE DIGIT PERCENTAGE of Mac sales. In other words.....maybe a few hundred thousand people out of MILLIONS of Mac users. And you're right.

Stop talking as if the new Mac Pro is worthy of an "iPhone like" announcement, its just silly. :rolleyes:
 
I did, and still found it pretty weird to disclose such big news possibly affecting stock price in an exclusive interview. But don't get me wrong I like the content of the news and message, just the way they're disclosing the information seems really weird to me.
Fair enough.

I do think Apple has a precedent for this, where phones have been handed out to key members of the  community and there were (IIRC) even one-on-one meetings with Apple executives to discuss the product, then the information is rolled out based on some predetermined embargo.

I think that's what this is about, sending a message to the Marco Arment's of the world that the Mac platform hasn't been abandoned, but in a way that still allows Apple to control the message.

Apologies if the tone of my reply to you was overly harsh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canubis
Finally Apple admitting the current Mac Pro was the wrong design to make and the wrong path to take for Pro users...non-modular and non-upgradable.

It's been three years since the Mac Pro, and they're "working hard" to design a new one, yet it's still over a year away?
 
http://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro

Quad-Core and Dual GPU
  • 3.7GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon E5 processor
  • 12GB 1866MHz DDR3 ECC memory
  • Dual AMD FirePro D300
    with 2GB GDDR5 VRAM each
  • 256GB PCIe-based flash storage1
What am I missing? Where's that update?

If the modular design is true, I would be very pleased. Now do the same with the MBP and let me update Ram and SSD and I'll be back on board.

Just Macrumors mis-interpreted, to be fair Schiller was ambiguous about what was really happening, the Verge got it right though. There was no actual update just a price reduction. Probably only in US tho its possible the UK pricing will increase as it has with all the other new prices lately.
 
Why would you ever buy into Apple's Mac Pro ecosystem? Remember 4 years ago when Phil Schiller stood on stage and said, "Can't innovate my ass..." and then Apple proceeds to forget about the Mac Pro for 4 years. People's memory is so short around here.

What people should be looking for are signs from apple that it is a sustained campaign with regular updates in the hopper year in and year out. Otherwise why would you ever buy into the "Pro" ecosystem? Apple has proven that they really don't care about you as a Pro user. Why would you give your money?

Its a fair attitude.

You have to give them credit for admitting they screwed up with the trash can and for breaking with tradition and confirming that new Mac Pros/Displays are coming though.

As you say though talking is all well and good they need to demonstrate that the Pro hardware will get regular updates.
 
To Me, this is the intriguing part: "As part of doing a new Mac Pro -- it is, by definition, a modular system"
Had this discussion some years ago: MacRumors post.

If they really want to innovate (and perhaps bring back lost customers), I believe they'd need to do something uncommon. Such as designing a system of function boxes that you could easily plug together (akin to Lego), with internal highspeed connectors between the boxes for making it nearly cable-free again.

Intel even presented a suitable platform ("Group Hug") already in 2013 (no idea if it's still around). And Apple has the required software available (Grand Central Dispatch, XGrid, XSan ...).

If they do it cleverly, they would design it in a way that a Mac Pro and a mini (and perhaps other products in their portfolio) could share the same housings and connectors, so you could customize both a mini and a Mac Pro precisely to your needs (having a standard basis and being able to add boxes for additional storage, better GPU, better/more CPU('s) etc.), while economies of scale work in favour of Apple. And you could update only the part that is your current bottleneck, instead of replacing the whole machine.

Think I even proposed all that in an eMail to Tim back in 2012.

But perhaps Apple considers "modular" to be just a redesigned cheesegrater MP with user-serviceable components again. Surely the less-risky (though also less innovative) route.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flint Ironstag
$4000 for D700 crossfire??? I could build a 1080Ti SLI machine for way less than that. Apple's gone off the deep end.
 
Apple also suggested that the "trash can" design of the current Mac Pro has restricted its ability to truly upgrade it.

So basically, they're probably going back to something akin to what the Mac Pro was before. I'm sure it won't look like a cheese grater, but it's nice to see them admit that the trash can Mac Pro, while it looked interesting, wasn't what pro customers needed over the long haul. Let's face it...if you're going to go 4+ years between hardware refreshes, you need to give customers something that will serve them well over a long period of time.
 
$4000 for D700 crossfire??? I could build a 1080Ti SLI machine for way less than that. Apple's gone off the deep end.

It's a stopgap. They've already admitted there will be a redesigned machine so unless you desperately need a Mac Pro now, it's silly to buy the speed bumped version. All they're doing now is offloading the remaining chassis to collectors and companies who can write off the depreciation against tax.
 
  • Like
Reactions: H2SO4
Just keep in mind folks that their interpretation of a Pro user is someone who needs emoticons in a touchbar. Hoping for the best here, but are we really going to get what we've been waiting for?
That wasn't my takeaway from this article at all.

In fact, this may be the first time in -- forever -- that an Apple executive has spelled out exactly what a "Pro" user is in the eyes of Apple.

So, basically, the exact opposite of what you said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMacHack
It's interesting that Apple seems to be in damage control mode with the Mac right now. It's like they had an Executive Team meeting and somebody said, "Guys, we're effing up the Mac...big time".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.