They never said they were out of the display business permanently. That was a pundit inference.Seems they rethought their stance on developing a display.
They never said they were out of the display business permanently. That was a pundit inference.Seems they rethought their stance on developing a display.
How long do you think it takes to design a brand new computer from scratch? But yes, they probably just and up with the idea yesterday.
They mention the Mac mini in the DF piece.Okay, there was no spec bump. They moved down the same old CPUs and GPUs into the next lower tier model, so it's basically just a price cut. The real deal is going to come next year.
Even among pro users, notebooks are by far the most popular Macs. In second place are iMacs. The Mac Pro is third. Apple declined to describe the Mac Pro’s share of all Macs sales any more specifically than “a single-digit percent”, but my gut feeling is that the single digit is a lot closer to 1 than it is to 9.
Think they really forgot that Mac mini still exists.
"Immense blowback..." from a single digit user base..., right...You can't be serious. It took them four years to realize their can was a mistake and they've been working hard on a replacement all this time because of their love and dedication to their computer customers?
Horsecrap.
They screwed the pooch with their can design. They have had immense blowback about it since the beginning from the very people who didn't request or need such innovation, but of course "we just weren't ready for their brave new world."
The truth is they haven't been working on anything, and for whatever reason, they've had a religious moment where they have realized they were wrong. Now, in an attempt to put their finger in the dam, they've let this update "leak" with Phil "can't admit we were wrong my ass" Schiller having to eat crow. Tell me, if they're so proud of this why no big announcement on Apple.com? Where's the fanfare and trumpets announcing the arrival of the new Mac Pro King?
And now...on top of the four years you believe they've been so diligently at work on the new Quantum Mr. Fusion powered Mac Pro...we have to wait yet another year?
They haven't even started working on it until NOW. From Phil Schiller in this article, "and that’ll take longer than this year to do."
Again...Horsecrap.
Basically that means "Can't innovate anymore"
If you read the DF piece you'll see there were 5 outlets who got the news.This is a really weird way for Apple to publicly release such information. So they just officially leaked such info to daring fireball exclusively? Aren't there rules in place that force publicly owned corporations to share any information relevant for the stock price with each stakeholder at the same time, like through a press release, the website etc. Announcing strategic directions for the Mac desktop line seems quite relevant to me, esp. after such long silence here and many people fearing the worst.
That's what I was wondering about. I'm curious how much work it would take. It seems like it's better suited to workstation uses than intel. And considerably cheaperIt would be interesting if they switched to AMD Ryzen for Pro. Not going to happen probably.
Good news indeed. Hello Scotland/Gunits.
How much of the slow pace of Mac Pro updates is because it's made in the USA?
It should be updated soon.What am I missing? Where's that update?
In the meantime, we're going to update the configs to make it faster and better for their dollar. This is not a new model, not a new design, we're just going to update the configs. We're doing that this week.
So where is this update? Cannot see it on the apple site
Although I have said many times that there is a truly new Mac Pro, new iMacs, and Apple displays in the works. I guess this is confirmation to doubters.