I’m never going to purchase a GM vehicle, so not an issue for me. However if they want to shoot themselves in the foot for people who do, go for it! 😉
I'm not wrong. Apple raked in $80B on "Services", aka SUBSCRIPTIONS, last year. Services revenue is Apple's big bright spot these days. I've made it clear in several of my comments that I'm talking about App Store subscriptions, which Apple controls 100%. Apple might not be selling most of its first party software as a subscription, but they have aggressively pushed the subscription model through the App Store. They are the largest purveyor of subscription software on the planet.Sorry, but you are wrong on both fronts.
MS heavily marketed Office 365 to consumers (e.g. the Family package clearly isn't aimed at business) and even cut off the ability to get the perpetual licence for the Home Use Program.
Name me one piece of software that Apple offers as a subscription that they used to offer as a perpetual licence. The iWork apps, Garage Band, iMovie - all consumer apps from Apple that are not only not subscription but are free. Even MacOS updates are free when they used to be chargable. Services like Apple Music, TV+, News+, Fitness+ etc are not a software subscripton, but a media subscription - you are paying a subscription fee because new media is constantly being added.
I never give Apple a pass - their constant price increases to compoensate for falling device sales and pretty poor level of technology on the non-Pro iPhone are examples of things that are a poor showing, but I just don't see how you can belive that Apple drove SaaS.
Do they make run flats for motorcycles?I am an excellent driver. 20 years in Alaska will do that to you
And yes, I've had a blow out at speed - on a motorcycle.
Me also. Best £40 I've spent in a long time. Works like a dream.👍I just made mine wireless with an adapter.
I bought one that had the highest ratings on Amazon.What car and which adapter did you go with? I'm tired of having issues with cable and am shopping around. 2018 Honda CR-V
Carplay was the most-requested extra for Teslas until Apple Music streaming became available last yearThat may be the case, but that hasn't prevented Tesla from not including CarPlay in its cars. But, unfortunately for GM, GM is not Tesla when it comes to EV market dominance and can ill afford such stunts.
Do they make run flats for motorcycles?
"I'm an excellent driver". Thought I was too - but there is always something out there that can make you re-think that. If you think that you're so good that you won't consider driver aids, good job I'll never find myself in a car with you, or hopefully even on the same road as you.
My concern is to when they’re going to stop supporting this in their current lineup that does work with CarPlay & Android Auto. Will my 6 year old Impala get an OTA update and suddenly remove CarPlay? I mean, it’s paid off. I have the Title. But updates still get pushed out. I highly doubt they would, but I could see it brought up in one of those board meetings 😆
Yup! I've turned the auto-updating off in the head unit's settings, but theoretically, yeah it could just continue to get updates. There was an update just recently over this last Winter.Does you six year old Impala actually get OTA updates? Most older vehicles you have to actually visit a dealership to upgrade the software or use a USB to update it.
A google account for my car? I have been complaining here more about the use of Google built-in than I have about GM options to not support CarPlay with it due to the likely tracking.It won't require a phone at all!! That's like saying buying an Android tablet requires you to have an Android phone... The most you may need is a Google account (and you can probably create a new one just for the car if you don't want to use your personal one or don't have one).
😂 Get over myself? You continue to mention things that aren't related, or have any bearing on the conversation. I'm sorry, but as long as you continue to be wrong, I'm going to continue to point it out. I get that you don't like having someone counter you when you are wrong, but it's not "nasty" to have that conversation.Wow. Get over yourself.
There are a lot of examples of hardware with components that are not accessible unless you pay to unlock them. A number of fitness wearables operate on this model. My SPOT emergency beacon includes hardware that allows for more enhanced communication - if I want to pay for it.
It's not unreasonable to think that car manufacturers might build hardware into their vehicles and then later charge for unlocking those features. What taking that approach does to the base price of the vehicle versus the current model of charging for additional features at time of purchase remains to be seen.
But seriously, get over your nasty ego. You're not anymore right than I am. Everyone is just speculating here. And frankly, there's no evidence that GM plans to charge for seat heaters or intermittent wipers or anything else. Also, nothing prevents them from doing all of that AND supporting CarPlay, so the argument that they're dropping CarPlay in order to push subscription features doesn't even add up.
Should Tesla support appple CarPlay?Tesla had a great UI. Then Christmas 2021 happened and that UI was a huge pile of crap. They hid things in sub menus and replaced the clean icons with kiddie android crap.
I sold my Model 3 in May 2022 because the update was a complete pile of trash. I spent 5 months trying to get them to restore the software with no luck.
I think this is different in that nearly all of GM's fleet of cars, trucks, and SUV's have supported CarPlay for many years now. Tesla hasn't ever. Taking something away as opposed to never including it to begin with is not the same comparison...Should Tesla support appple CarPlay?
No.Should Tesla support appple CarPlay?
I can't think of another person who could care less what his customers think than Elon.All this GM hate - what about TESLA HATE?!
They need to support apple carplay NOW!!!!
Where are my tesla bros who agree with me?
You covered both of my thoughts.The better way is better training/education.
Require what most consider "advanced" driving instruction before getting a license (at 16). Require annual training until the age of 21.
(There are a few programs out there... Many local police departments have... something. The most affordable national program I can think of with certified in-car coaches in Tire Rack Street Survival - in partnership with the BMWCCA and the SCCA. The main limitation there is the car clubs finding suitable large open paved sites with owners/operators who will allow the sites to be used for these events.)
And, then, require additional/refresher training every 5 years, moving forward.
Tire Rack Street Survival is an example of an amazing and affordable teen driving program, that I'd love to see as required training. I'd love it if the AARP "classes" for older drivers added (any) similar practical training with in-car coaches. The AARP classes (at least in the area my parents live) are a joke in comparison to what many local police departments offer teen drivers.
Making people dependent on tech to keep them "safe" will only make them lazier and even less attentive and less safe on the road.
Sigh.