That all sounds good on paper. I have a friend who has an F-150 Lightning and he said the range drops by more than half in our cold winters. I think most people who are pro-EV live in more temperate urban environments. I live in the mountains and they just don't make sense up here (for now).Home solar and then you use your car as a battery when the power grid fails during a weather event.
Ford's Electric F-150 can run your house for about 10 days when the grid fails due to someone else's incompetence: https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/...ectric-pickup-intelligent-backup-power-house/
Lol. Thanks for the laugh!IMHO, Google Maps pales by comparison with Apple Maps.
Ditto to unlock the doors, open the charging port, etc. Incredibly frustrating that I can't just hit a button - on the passenger door - to unlock all the doors. As for driving? The fonts are tiny and important information (like your speed) is placed on the screen in a way that it's blocked by your hand on the steering wheel. If you want to change the temperature, you have to look at the screen to find the right place to touch, swipe up, fiddle with the setting. Much easier (and safer!) to have an analog dial that you simply reach down and turn without taking your hands off the road.
A screen is fine for displaying information while driving (if the fonts were bigger and placement better), but to operate controls while driving it's horrible.
I was specifically responding to the comment about people going on a rampage and running people over - as clearly indicated by my post.
But that said - adding ever increasing technology to overcome a lack of skills is not the way to go, in my opinion. I think the better way to go is to have real consequences for causing fatal and serious accidents. Simply dispossess and execute the offenders. Those remaining will get the idea at some point that perhaps, just perhaps, they should pay attention to their driving.
But sure - keep adding more technology to cars, keep driving up the prices and making private vehicles unaffordable to the masses, to make and keep them dependent on govt-provided transportation. We all know that's the real goal.
If you think people get read ended and side swiped is a highly unlikely event I guess we aren't on the same page. The point of these new features are to prevent the types of accidents that happen daily. The new cars will have features to avoid the old cars. Old cars will soon be cost prohibitive to drive when insurance catches up.
Yes I used an extreme example, but I see Johnny either playing with his phone or talking to his crotch daily on my 40 minute commute.
You say you understand but continue to give examples that show you don't. You don't want heated seats, don't buy a vehicle that has them. Vehicle manufactures aren't going to give away free hardware (wiring harness and controls) in the hopes that people are going to subscribe to the heated seat feature. (And may God help us if we ever become dumb enough to want that.) If this did happen you would still be paying for the heated seat hardware at the time of purchase, plus an additional cost when you go to use them. Most vehicles now have them standard because it's cheaper for them to do it that way.No, I want seat heaters to be installed and I only want to pay for them if/when I want them. In many ways this makes a lot of sense for the manufacturer. Instead of producing many different seats with many different configurations, they produce one seat and the customer pays to activate features if desired. This makes the seat cheaper to produce. It also makes every car buyer a potential user of that feature. We see this same business model today with some consumer electronics. The device doesn't cost a lot and contains all of the necessary hardware for the more expensive subscription-only features.
You obviously missed the multiple heat waves across Canada in recent years. I think most people would agree that climate control features are a standard feature. Heated seats are not.
Yes, of course I realize that hardware comes with a cost. But so does software. Hardware I'm paying to design and manufacture it. Software I'm paying to design, develop, and support it. There are costs either way.
I can also imagine that by producing one seat instead of many different seat configurations, costs can be reduced and service can be simplified. How that works out in the end, I don't know.
Lol. They aren't going anywhere. They make a lot of sense when done right. Apple will probably rake in $100B this year on the back of subscriptions, so if you don't like subscriptions, you're supporting the wrong company!
The least important part of the decision for you. No one is “daft” for having different priorities when purchasing a vehicle.
Does your dash-mounted iPhone have as large a screen as most vehicles that support CarPlay? Can you look at your phone as easily as the built-in display? Do turn-by-turn directions show up on your HUD, as they do in some cars? Guess those of us who think these things are important must be "daft" compared to you in your infinite wisdom.My 2015 GMC Canyon doesn't have CarPlay and I don't really miss it. I've driven/rented loads of cars with it, connected my phone etc. and it's nice to have, but I have my iPhone on a dash mount and frankly am not limited by the CarPlay UI.
It's certainly not a must-have and if you're daft enough to base the purchase of a vehicle on whether or not it has CarPlay, well I guess you can just be daft. It's about the least important factor when making a vehicle decision.
Still, my point is valid. What is going to be the resale value of a car that’s 5 years old with 80-90,000 miles on it? Not good, if at all. Hybrids still solve a problem in that they never need to be hooked up to the grid. We don’t need them to rely on a grid that is aging and will go over capacity, and drivers don’t need to rely on expensive charging stations, especially if they live in apartments. EVs have a lot of real-world problems that many seem content to ignore.Hybrids were a good stop-gap, but they aren't the future as BEVs will undercut them in price soon. Hybrids essentially have both an ICE drivetrain/transmission and an EV drivetrain/transmission and systems for them to operate together. Also, I think you're a bit out of touch with batteries needing to be changed every 5 years. Plenty of data on 8-10 year old Tesla's now showing that the batteries are holding up pretty well.
While I don't disagree with this I don't see any training and education fixing it. It's funny even talking about age. I see people doing extremely stupid and dangerous stuff daily (Atlanta commuter) these aren't teens or young adults doing this stuff everyday. They are people who think their job/wife/whatever is more important. Last week I saw a dude going 30ish mph on a middle lane on 75N I thought he was having car trouble and was watching the traffic moving 70+ around him on approach. Nope he was a crotch talker (someone looking straight down obviously on his phone).The better way is better training/education.
Require what most consider "advanced" driving instruction before getting a license (at 16). Require annual training until the age of 21.
(There are a few programs out there... Many local police departments have... something. The most affordable national program I can think of with certified in-car coaches in Tire Rack Street Survival - in partnership with the BMWCCA and the SCCA. The main limitation there is the car clubs finding suitable large open paved sites with owners/operators who will allow the sites to be used for these events.)
And, then, require additional/refresher training every 5 years, moving forward.
Tire Rack Street Survival is an example of an amazing and affordable teen driving program, that I'd love to see as required training. I'd love it if the AARP "classes" for older drivers added (any) similar practical training with in-car coaches. The AARP classes (at least in the area my parents live) are a joke in comparison to what many local police departments offer teen drivers.
Making people dependent on tech to keep them "safe" will only make them lazier and even less attentive and less safe on the road.
Sigh.
At this moment hybrid is the way to go. The future is all electric but that is not nowStill, my point is valid. What is going to be the resale value of a car that’s 5 years old with 80-90,000 miles on it? Not good, if at all. Hybrids still solve a problem in that they never need to be hooked up to the grid. We don’t need them to rely on a grid that is aging and will go over capacity, and drivers don’t need to rely on expensive charging stations, especially if they live in apartments. EVs have a lot of real-world problems that many seem content to ignore.
I think my car has a cd player, I'll need to get back to you on that)))Have you ever driven a car with a CD player only long term in 2023?
This is what escapes a lot of people who drone on about “renewables” without a complete understanding of the pros AND the cons. Like you, I’m all for solar and other renewables where it makes sense. I live in a cloudy place, but I‘m thinking of installing a couple solar panels to supplement my regular service (I like to tinker). But I can’t go 100% solar as it doesn’t make sense, especially from a financial standpoint. There really is no single ideal solution and we’re quite a few years away from being able to go 100% electric and renewable.Solar is a great option, but it doesn't make sense in all environments.
Interesting. I have found just the oppositeIMHO, Google Maps pales by comparison with Apple Maps.
I still have a single din. A single din flip out display with the CarPlay is like $700. My car is 2002. I would do aftermarket if possible for CarPlay even if I miss out on some functions
I stand by my opinion - anyone declaring CarPlay as a deal breaker when choosing a vehicle is 10000% daft and I guarantee you that if you want a particular model of car and it no longer has CarPlay, you'll buy it anyhow.
I use an AppleTV because the software built into my television is garbage, and I don't want to have to upgrade my TV to have the latest and fastest interface to my content.
Same situation here - I have no reason to think a car manufacturer will get this stuff right, and their plan is to have me subscribe to their services? They can get bent.