Why? Do you want Apple to have more stuff to deal with? Let's expand the attack vector instead of reducing it. eh? Are you still on 15.0.1....that was yesterdays' news.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Says iOS is Safer Than Android Because Sideloading Apps Isn't Allowed
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Ignorance is strength, Citizen So@So@So.😬
As long as the people remain ignorant about sideloading, it will remain Apple's talking point strength.
And macOS is less secure because of it. Look it up. Malware on macOS grew 1,000% in 2020. macOS is just not as widely used as windows so windows is the one that gets all the malware.
People really need to stop comparing phones with computers. It is a major safety issue if my phone has ransomware on it and I am unable to call 911 after a car accident and I am badly injured.
And yes, I do want both Windows and macOS to be completely locked down. Ever heard of Zombie systems? DDoS, spam emails and more are all due to these zombie systems running in the background.
I would argue that this is a contributing factor, but not the sole reason. I suppose you could also argue that the Apple store is more secure and stringent in what apps it allows on it's platform VS the playstore. That's not to say that some don't obviously make it through, just not as many as a platform designed to support a lot more devices. I don't have exact numbers, but it seems fair to assume that their aren't as many apps on Apple's store VS the playstore. Less apps inherently make it easier to keep track of and control. So, between the inability to sideload and a more stringent app store, make this a more likely combo of why iOS is safer, from a malware/spyware standpoint.
In response to the European Commission's proposed Digital Markets Act, which could force sideloading of apps on the iPhone in Europe, Apple has shared an in-depth document highlighting the security and privacy risks of sideloading. Sideloading refers to installing apps outside of the App Store, such as from a website or a third-party app store.
Apple's document, titled Building a Trusted Ecosystem for Millions of Apps, states that "mobile malware and the resulting security and privacy threats are increasingly common and predominantly present on platforms that allow sideloading." For example, Apple cited Nokia's 2019 and 2020 Threat Intelligence Reports that found Android devices to have an "estimated 15 to 47 times more infections from malicious software" than iPhones.On the other hand, Apple claimed that malware on iOS is rare and said that many of the attacks on the platform are "narrowly targeted attacks, often carried out by nation-states." Apple added that "experts generally agree that iOS is safer compared to Android, in part because Apple does not support sideloading."
Apple said if it were forced to allow sideloading, users would be subjected to more malicious apps and have less control over apps after they download them onto their devices. Apple added that some proposed sideloading legislation would also mandate removing protections against third-party access to proprietary hardware elements and non-public operating system functions, resulting in security and privacy risks for users.
Apple added that even users who don't wish to sideload and prefer to download apps only from the App Store would be harmed if sideloading were required, as some users may have no choice other than sideloading an app they need for work, school, or other essential reasons. In addition, Apple said criminals may trick users into sideloading apps by mimicking the appearance of the App Store or by advertising free or exclusive features.
Apple touched on many of these arguments in a similar document shared back in June. Apple CEO Tim Cook previously claimed that sideloading apps "would destroy the security of the iPhone" and "a lot of the privacy initiatives that we've built into the App Store."
Apple's document goes on to provide examples of common malware affecting mobile platforms like Android and makes more arguments against sideloading.
Apple has faced increasing scrutiny over its App Store, which remains the only place to install apps on the iPhone and iPad, excluding devices that have been jailbroken. Fortnite creator Epic Games sued Apple last year for anticompetitive conduct, but it was unsuccessful in getting the court to force Apple to allow third-party app stores on iOS.
Article Link: Apple Says iOS is Safer Than Android Because Sideloading Apps Isn't Allowed
So let me get this straight. Apple will soon not be able to say "safety", yet opening up iOS will somehow make it more secure or the same level of secure? I doubt it. Police cannot keep streets 100% secure, otherwise there would be no robberies or murders. So lets just get rid of police too?
If you want iOS to be 100% secure, lets make App Review (even small updates) take weeks or months. That way Apple can scan the entire source code and do a full regression test on the software.
So...$900 for the iPhone and $700+ for a Mac to be able to install via Xcode? And how does someone get an Xcode project file if the company won't allow it?
People keep mentioning this. You and others are mixing up hardware and software. You own the PHONE, not the OS. You can buy the phone and jailbreak it - go right ahead! But Apple is under no legal obligation to help or provide instructions on how to hack it. You can buy the phone and immediately throw it in a swimming pool and leave it there for months if you want. But you don't own the software.
Yes 100% agree. People need to stop being so selfish. Good for you that you are smart enough to NOT get tricked by anything. However, my Grandma would and has been tricked before on Android, which mines her contacts, which leaks MY information, which leads to me getting scam calls and spam emails.
Zombie systems and other phones/devices getting infected has an indirect influence on EVERYONE.
That’s a good point, but the market share matters tremendously.
Mac users (of which I’m one) aren’t targeted because they make up a smith smaller segment of the desktop and notebook market.
the same cannot be said about the mobile space.
imagine a malicious programmer being able to target 1 BILLION iPhone users.
Seeing as how Android has 73 percent of worldwide market share that means a malicious programmer could target 2.7 billions Android users. Yet planes aren't falling out of the sky and life continues to go on. It's just fear mongering. The reality is that the vast majority of Android users don't bother side-loading anyway and thus are at no more risk than an iPhone user.
Had to agree with apple on this one. There are hundreds of illegal fintech practices in my country and unfortunately users are lacking both digital and financial literacy. Such practices occur because android allow users to sideload of .apks, in which they used to install the illegal fintech apps. Our country is currently battling these practices as many people are trapped in debts with riddiculous amount of interest.
Ignorance is to think that this is all about sideloading of the apps.
There is nothing wrong in not having the technical knowledge about something.
It's absolutely true. Apple checks every app uploaded to it's app store for malware.
By Apple's logic, Google is defying the laws of economics.
- iOS is more secure than Android.
- Android has way more vulnerabilities.
- Law of supply demand says price increases inversely with supply:demand ratio
- ie: cost per cookie would be greater 50cookies/100buyers vs 100cookies/100buyers.
- Currently, Zerodium pays out higher for Android 0days than iOS 0days.
- Zerodium is paying more for something less in demand and is more widely available (according to Apple)
Apple doesn't have the resources to do that even if it wanted to, to check every app, every update version. At best, they screen the initial app, by reviewing the code, and then at random updates.
Three things are obvious -
Apple will be forced to allow side loading.
It will make iPhone less secure for most ordinary users. It simply will.
I will like it because I can manage the security issues and certain apps Apple would never allow will now be available.
Apple will be forced to allow side loading.
It will make iPhone less secure for most ordinary users. It simply will.
I will like it because I can manage the security issues and certain apps Apple would never allow will now be available.
True.
That's a gross generalization. Some of us are not happy with many of the restrictions but we choose to use some Apple products anyway for a multitude of reasons.
At least it will be left to individual users to not go down that road if they don't feel comfortable.
The Google Play store has been described as a municipal dump, and unfortunately I tend to agree. The low barrier to entry seem to have produced a ton of extremely bad apps.
It is optional on Android. You have to select an option to allow that.
14 pages already?
I find it hilarious, that in an Apple forum, so many people are furious when the realities of Android are brought up. There’s more anger here than in actual Android forums.
I find it hilarious, that in an Apple forum, so many people are furious when the realities of Android are brought up. There’s more anger here than in actual Android forums.
I did.
I though the iPhone was fairly useless before Apple offered iOS 2.0 and its developer SDK support, and still useless without paying the $99/annum developer enrollment (which I consider the part of an iPhone's price). So I didn't buy my first iPhone 3G until after I could pay the $99 for my developer program enrollment, download Xcode and the iOS SDK, and learned to code the apps that I wanted to side load on my iPhone. Now it's even easier with all the open source iOS app components and examples on GitHub (including game emulators and etc.)
Not paying the $99/annum developer enrollement is your iPhone price discount for not being able to side load apps (that you can code yourself, or find source code for).