Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple doesn't their cut when there is no IAP.

Or because it goes against some terms of service.

You can't know that and the part about greed is purely speculative.

if the lawless wasteland of android hasn't turned into a fragmented mess of side loaded malware (like apple most malware and scam apps come from the app store) it is pure speculation to think this will somehow spell the end of ios security. Xbox live streaming doesn't go against terms of service apple just wants their cut of games revenue even though they're happy to let netflix stream videos or buy products on amazon without taking a cut of in app purchases
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
Both of my children have automatic iOS updates enabled, and yet as of 2 days ago, they still had 14.7.1 installed, and were vulnerable to the "zero click" messaging hack. Both of them have been receiving multiple, unrecognized group chats with suspicious links in them. On my daughter MacBook, the messages app was pegging her CPU. When I checked, it had racked up 10 hours of CPU use.

Sorry, but they don't get to play the security card.
I get unrecognized chats all the time. With strange links in them. And my iOS updates are auto enabled. I get and see the alert asking if now is a good time or I can go into settings and general and install now if I like. Same for the watch.
Its' those vulnerabilities that worry me the most if Sideloading is apart of iOS going forward. You, me, your children maybe wise enough to notice it and ignore and or delete it. But, there are tons of folks that trust those things will not affect them because you can't do anything outside the App Store. So how can you download something and have it install and hack your phone if you couldn't get it from the App Store? What's side loading? I don't want that, can I remove it? I can't? It's built in because some buggers complained they can't get their freeware from their sites on there device?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ohio.emt
The US court in California has said that Apple did not violate any laws; thus validating Apples business model in the US. That doesn't mean in the US that congress can't pass some other Monday morning quarterback laws to force Apple to alter a business practice. But that would likely be challenged to the Supreme Court. What happens in the EU remains to be seen. IMO, government in the US should keep it's nose out of this type of micro-managing. So yeah, I'm against passing laws to force change of business practices, unless they are currently illegal. Vote with ones' dollars instead.
Congress can absolutely pass laws regulating businesses. Don’t know why you would say they can’t. Where do you think the three laws I referenced came from, that they were handed down by god? The SCOTUS could rule a congressionally-passed law unconstitutional, but that’s a mighty high bar. And if the the other three antitrust laws have passed constitutional muster, I have no doubt some changes to reflect our digital age would as well. The Commerce Clause in the constitution gives the federal government extremely wide latitude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
"Apple Says iOS is Safer Than Android Because Sideloading Apps Isn't Allowed"

Well, with the same argument you could nearly forbid anything (i.e. live in China is safer than in USA because XXX isn't allowed). In the end it mainly protects the one who makes the rules...
 
Congress can absolutely pass laws regulating businesses. Don’t know why you would say they can’t.
I didn't. I said laws can be challenged. You said I said they couldn't.
Where do you think the three laws I referenced came from, that they were handed down by god? The SCOTUS could rule a congressionally-passed law unconstitutional, but that’s a mighty high bar.
In the realm of possibility then.
And if the the other three antitrust laws have passed constitutional muster, I have no doubt some changes to reflect our digital age would as well. The Commerce Clause in the constitution gives the federal government extremely wide latitude.
Everything can be challenged.
 
a better word would be disingenuous ..

you assume that Apple is "checking" all of the functionalities of all apps in the AppStore which is naive.

numerous shadow and scam apps exist in the AppStore.

Nobody is going to be worried about sideloading apps from known devs.

That is fine when a user can be 100% certain they are downloading from the trusted developer, but I am sure you have a higher degree of technical acuity and have had to show people you know that the site they think LOOKS legitimate is not.
 
It is your phone and therefore your should have the power to decide which apps are installed on it. Imagine a TV manufacturer disallowing people to watch a TV channel that is not on their list of "safe" TV channels. Or a car manufacturer that does not allow the customer to drive anywhere he wants.
I want Sony Playstation 5 Spider-Man on my Xbox One X.
I want Street Fighter 5 on my Xbox
I want Nintendo Switch Mario Kart on my iPhone.
Shall I go on?

As far as the TV comparison. Well, if you got a TV and your getting your stations via Over-The-Air (Digital Antennas). Well, you certainly can NOT get any station you want. And if you get your TV via Cable/SAT/Internet. You certainly can do better than over the air. But, you most likely can get most if not all your channels that way. Except when the provider you use has an issue with one of those channels and they want to charge more for their services, and your provider says F off, and drops them. You can go looking elsewhere, or maybe try and get that channel directly from them if you crave it so.

Apple thinks differently on that kind of situation. They want to be a one stop shopping. We made this device, you like it, great. We have an operating system and it can do all these cool things with cameras and messaging etc. You like, great. We also have this store where if you like you can shop for a bunch of different things made by all these developers. We have made it safe and yes, its the only way to get things on the device. If you like it you can purchase it. If you don't, thanks for looking at our stuff. If you change your mind where here.
Besides that the ability to load apps from other sources is necessary to load older versions that often are better.
Security! Also, it maybe incompatible with the newer operating system. Could be buggy, and you have no support etc. This is generally only a good idea if you're going to be static on one device and OS version and to be safe off network.
Instagram is a good example. Since last year Instagram spams the news feed of people with posts from accounts they do not follow. That makes all versions since then pretty unusable. As I have an Android phone, I was able to delete Instagram and install an older version that still works fine and does not spam my news feed.
That's great. But, limited use case and while it may work great for you. A system update can come along and break that $#!T. For you that maybe fine, for many like you also.
Another thing is the censorship of Apple. I live in Germany and here nudity is nothing special. Noone would complain about nipples. However a German newspaper who had female nipples on their front page every day for decades also had them in their app of course, but then Apple threatened to ban that app from the App Store because of the nipples. So some cojnservative Apple Taliban from Silicon Valley forces his middle age moral standards about nudity on German iPhone owners. That should not be possible. If you paid for that phone, you should be able to see as many nipples as you want.
F Yes! You had me at Nipples! Go Germany!
Apple also deleted some apps that made fun of Jesus, which also is not a problem here in Europe except maybe Poland. Who wants a phone without apps that make fun of Jesus?
You had me at nipples.
I would even go a step further: Apple should allow people to install Android or any other OS if they really want.
So on a technical front. No, as that would open up how Apple's magic works in regards to the hardware they built. How to connect to the secure enclave or faceID system.
You are certainly free to try and experiment on that end if you like. For personal use that is.
I hope the EU will also force Apple to make the battery easily replaceble again.
Ha on that one. However, there is a company making I think its called Freephone. Totally user serviceable with a replaceable battery! Runs that darn Android OS i'm afraid. But, hey... NIPPLES!
 
The argument is fundamentally true of course.

The same way that an automobile which is geographically restricted from driving on a roadway that has a posted speed limit over 25mph and locking the top speed of said vehicle at 25mph is safer.

You are far less likely to encounter a fatal speed in those conditions.

Many here are acting like their argument is untrue. It is not.

The argument of malicious apps on the iOS appstore is fine, but please DO look at how often in the past Apple has had to remove multiple apps and make statements warning users to remove them vs what Google has had to do.

Whatever Apple does on the App Store is working better than what Google is doing on theirs. Sideloading aside.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
That is fine when a user can be 100% certain they are downloading from the trusted developer, but I am sure you have a higher degree of technical acuity and have had to show people you know that the site they think LOOKS legitimate is not.

just like we do on computers?
 
Once again Apple is focusing on the thing that isn’t the biggest complaint. From what I’ve followed over the past few years most developers/Apple tech pundits etc. are supporting 3rd party payment options (or at least removing anti-steering provisions) not alternate app stores or side loading. Of course Apple wants to focus on side loading because that’s where they’ll get the most people to agree with them. They don’t want to talk about why it’s perfectly fine/private/secure to use 3rd party payment options on iOS for physical goods but not for digital goods because their stance is a lot more shaky and has less support.
 
That is fine when a user can be 100% certain they are downloading from the trusted developer, but I am sure you have a higher degree of technical acuity and have had to show people you know that the site they think LOOKS legitimate is not.

I realize that phone people are the lowest common denominator but they seem to be surviving using macs that are not locked down. they will survive this also.
 
a better word would be disingenuous ..

you assume that Apple is "checking" all of the functionalities of all apps in the AppStore which is naive.

numerous shadow and scam apps exist in the AppStore.

Nobody is going to be worried about sideloading apps from known devs.
That and it's not like you're forced to sideload apps if you have an Android phone. It's just an option. You can easily just stick with google play store.
 
I'm skeptical of Apple's claims.

The Macintosh is wide open: we can side load, we can write our own kexts, we can use alternative boot loaders, and yet the Mac is pretty secure. So I'm not buying it. I am on the side of giving users choice. No one has to use an alternative App Store if they don't want to.

And regarding some apps for school not being available on the main App Store and thus possibly resulting in security risks, why couldn't the school(s) ensure a secure website for users to download the app onto the phone? Just like what happens on the Macintosh? One could argue that with Apple's current policies, certain legitimate apps are unavailable because Apple didn't want to allow them onto the App Store (e.g., Wifi Explorer).
Why are you are comparing these two platforms? There are about 100m Macs in use vs 1B+ iPhones — and yet, there are more damaging viruses and malware for the Mac. Why do you think this is? Why is the problem even worse on a PC and on Android?
 
"Apple Says iOS is Safer Than Android Because Sideloading Apps Isn't Allowed"

Well, with the same argument you could nearly forbid anything (i.e. live in China is safer than in USA because XXX isn't allowed). In the end it mainly protects the one who makes the rules...
If I control a reserve currency emission, I don’t care who makes the rules…
 
I'm ok with sideloading iOS apps sometimes I don't like an app update and prefer to sideload a previous version. It should be allowed!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.