Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You’re talking about the game manufacturers and not apple? Apple cannot test every single app on the App Store. Things crop up and hopefully these issues are not akin to “you’re holding it wrong.”
Uncommon games like Instagram and Uber? ;)
 
Apple probably did, however on an older version of the app. The app developers update so frequently that the developers probably didn’t test on the new hardware before they released it. Apple can’t delay a flagship product because the developers don’t keep up or plan appropriately.
I didn't say they should delay anything. But their SW QC lately leaves much to be desired.
 
All of this makes you wonder about how any security issues that exist that just simply haven't been exposed yet.
 
I don't have the 15 Pro/Pro Max...yet. (still 13 PM) One thing I did notice with Instagram especially after iOS 17.0, this data sucking app is sucking data more than before. iPhone Storage showing an obscene 9.45GB in "Phone Storage" section in settings. That was yesterday...so I deleted it, again. 2nd time.

The night of Sept. 18 when I initially installed 17.0, Instagram showed just over 8GB of space used (I deleted the app, installed it again, which knocked it was down to 350mb). My phone is not showing heat issues...but 9GB in 10-11 days, no way I used that amount on this app. Something off is with IG, and other 3rd party apps.

I DO hope these rouge apps are the root cause..or a majority of it. I still wonder about those talking on the phone and other regular uses..and this phone heats up. Guess we'll see. I personally would like to grab this phone..but I will wait until this issue clears up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Antoniosmalakia
Idk if you’re troll baiting or what but this is ridiculous…under Jobs Apple had an insane amount of blunders, even if we’re just confining the list to the iPhone only. Remember when they first launched Apple Maps? Total disaster.
I do remember. Steve Jobs was already dead a year when Apple Maps launched.

Also, you’re comparing one of Apple’s most ambitious projects (mapping the world is hard!) to minor, iterative updates to a well established product.

Under Steve Jobs, the executive ranks were like a turnstile. Under Cook, it’s become a retirement home.
 
We strongly disagree. Overall Apple products are very competent. As clearly evidenced by the high prices consumers are willing to pay. Duh.
“We”? You mean, fanboys? Because no critically thinking, objective person could say that Apple is a better company now than it was under Jobs… it’s not even close.

I’m paying relatively high prices for gas but that doesn’t mean I like it. Smartphones are a necessity at this point.

And there are other factors for Apple’s “success.” Namely, the even greater ineptitude of their competitors… all 1 of them, and smartphones isn’t even their core business.
 
Not surprised. Unless they changed the thermal design, titanium has half the thermal conductivity as stainless steel and 40 times less that aluminum. Titanium just doesn’t conduct heat well so you tend to get hot spots.
And stainless steel has less conductivity than Titanium. It’s not like these phones had aluminum frames before.
 
Hey genius, glass is an insulator and does not allow heat to path through

Not sure they taught that in the Art History program
Your snide comment aside. Glass does conduct heat. It’s not as conductive as metals but it does conduct heat. That glass back is where the iPhone radiates most of its heat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
Thermal conductivity or the ability of a given material to conduct/transfer heat is 237 W/m·K (Watts per meter Kelvin) and titanium is 24. Titanium conducts heat about 10 less easily that Aluminum. Changes to software will not alter the rules of physics. But softwares throttling the Phone will help generate less heat. See September 26th rumor from Kuo--https://www.macrumors.com/2023/09/26/iphone-15-pro-overheating/
Titanium is replacing stainless steel which has even less thermal conductivity. How is the titanium the reason for this overheating? Is it the metal frames getting hot or the back glass?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Titanium has a thermal conductivity of 21.9 W m-1 K-1 with aluminum at 235 W m-1 K-1. Stainless steel has a thermal conductivity of 15.0 W m-1 K-1.
They're using Grade 5 titanium which has a thermal conductivity of 6.7 W/m-K. So it's even worse with regard to that material.

But that said, the new aluminum substrate makes it a lot more complicated. The aluminum is acting as a heat spreader allowing that heat to be spread evenly along the titanium outer frame (which is very thin). So it's possible that this engineered combination is giving the phone an overall better thermal flow than the previous stainless steel frame unitary frame. That likely had all the heat dissipating over a smaller region of the overall frame. Obviously we don't have the heat flow model, but it might be a really elegant solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
But wasn't it stainless steel+aluminum before ?
It was just stainless steel for the old pro phones. I don't believe they had the aluminum substrate.
Of course it doesn’t. Where do we think most of the heat is radiated…through the slim metal sides or the large glass front and back?
The thermal conductivity of glass is very low (1.38 vs 16.3 for SS and 6.7 for Ti). So a large portion of the heat does escape from the metal frame. The non-pro aluminum phones have the best material for this, but even with stainless and titanium's relative bad thermal conductivity, they're far superior to glass and the heat will flow through those regions faster.
 
The grade of titanium isn’t what I’m talking about. I’m talking about the amount of titanium. It has been independently verified that the titanium is bonded to aluminum, and there is approximately 1 mm of titanium as a facade for the aluminum:
I watched the same video and got something completely different out of it. He never said there was only 1mm left. He saw that the entire rail was made of Titanium. That same video also said it was Grade 5, which means Apple was not lying when it said that the rim was made of titanium. The leftovers looked like a lot more than 1mm of side rail.

His first video on the teardown of the 15 showed where the aluminum internals and the titanium met. Those meet on the inside each rail, not detracting at all from the width of the rail. The rail itself is titanium. I resist saying pure, since nobody uses pure. That’s where the grading system comes in. The railing looks the same pre-melting versus post-melting. He even commented he was surprised Apple made the USB-C ring out of titanium since it’s not as exposed, which to me shows Apple was using more titanium than promised.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
I watched the same video and got something completely different out of it. He never said there was only 1mm left. He saw that the entire rail was made of Titanium. That same video also said it was Grade 5, which means Apple was not lying when it said that the rim was made of titanium. The leftovers looked like a lot more than 1mm of side rail.

He measured the thickness of the titanium layer at 1mm

timelink
 
…what? Apple doesn’t want to allow side loading because of privacy and security issues, not because bugs exist and sometimes performance isn’t optimized. AFAIK there are no requirements that apps in the Store run perfectly under all conditions, nor is that a realistic expectation.

For security I can understand that but not really for privacy reasons otherwise they wouldn't approve Tiktok, Instagram or any other similar anti-privacy app.
 
His first video on the teardown of the 15 showed where the aluminum internals and the titanium met. Those meet on the inside each rail, not detracting at all from the width of the rail. The rail itself is titanium. I resist saying pure, since nobody uses pure. That’s where the grading system comes in. The railing looks the same pre-melting versus post-melting. He even commented he was surprised Apple made the USB-C ring out of titanium since it’s not as exposed, which to me shows Apple was using more titanium than promised.

Here’s the screen shot. The darker metal is Titanium, the lighter aluminum. I think everyone needs some clarification that when we’re saying “width” at this point, we’re talking about the cross section as seen in this photo, not the profile that is exposed on the sides of the phone. I have a feeling everyone is probably saying the same thing.

What is more or less clear is that the titanium portion of the frame is made up of a 1mm (in this cross sectional dimension) band of grade 5 titanium bonded to the aluminum, plus the buttons and USB-C ring.

IMG_0820.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.