That's the weirdest interpretation of the Mac Pro delay I've seen. Mostly likely it was a combination of several things: 1) Waiting for CPU & GPU updates that fit inside the power envelope of the machine, 2) Hoping that people would simply all decide to use iMacs and settle for mobility GPUs, and 3) Neglect. The Mac Pro is absolutely NOT where ARM will be making its debut. Should you find yourself buying an ARM based Mac, it'll be at the low end of the compute-spectrum: the MacBook.I bet this was the reason for the delayed Mac Pro. Apple thought they could introduce a Mac Pro ARM but the project was not a success.
Maybe. But if I have a long document on my iPad and a long document on my Mac, and I do a search on both of them, the Mac's response is instantaneous. The iPad's most definitely isn't.Did Apple actually say no to ARM based MAC?
I don't think so though.
I would welcome ARM based MAC as I see the consistent performance of ARM on iOS.
Funny....
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/8/1...s-full-windows-10-with-photoshop-on-arm-chips
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rm-server-chips-threatening-intel-s-dominance
Microsoft is still making a heavy push into ARM on both the consumer/professional markets.
Who gives a **** what platform software runs on as long as it runs in the most efficient manner?
Lack of macOS on iPads is a feature, not a bug. The people clamouring for a desktop operating system or legacy PC features like a file manager on a tablet are the minority. They just don't know it yet.
Apple laptop trackpads support gestures, enabling you to do just that without having to reach forward off the keyboard surface and get grubby fingerprints all over that beautiful screen.I use a Dell all-in-one at work that has a touchscreen. I dont use it much but its nice to have as I sometimes use it when scrolling a PDF or doing pinch to zoom. Its not catastrophically bad as apple makes it out to be...
Its not something you will use often but its nice to have an option.
That's the weirdest interpretation of the Mac Pro delay I've seen. Mostly likely it was a combination of several things: 1) Waiting for CPU & GPU updates that fit inside the power envelope of the machine, 2) Hoping that people would simply all decide to use iMacs and settle for mobility GPUs, and 3) Neglect. The Mac Pro is absolutely NOT where ARM will be making its debut. Should you find yourself buying an ARM based Mac, it'll be at the low end of the compute-spectrum: the MacBook.
[doublepost=1491437972][/doublepost]
Maybe. But if I have a long document on my iPad and a long document on my Mac, and I do a search on both of them, the Mac's response is instantaneous. The iPad's most definitely isn't.
Apple laptop trackpads support gestures, enabling you to do just that without having to reach forward off the keyboard surface and get grubby fingerprints all over that beautiful screen.
Exactly. I've glanced at PC's for a while now - I really, really dislike windows, but the raw specs for the price is getting very attractive. Some, like Dell, even has hardware like this shipping with Ubuntu on them, which is the next best thing after OS X imo. And, there are github repos that are making basically one-click hackintosh installs with auto-update features for these devices as well, meaning you won't have to tinker for weeks trying to get OS X to run on them. While it's not 100% matured yet, I think getting hardware like this and run OS X flawlessly on it is pretty close. Can't wait.
You have to read that quote in context. Do you really think Steve Jobs thought software for drawing or painting was an inappropriate use for a tablet? Apple has not introduced a "stylus" in the sense he was talking about - a tool used to navigate a touch UI. That is what he was talking about - Apple would have "blown it" had they ever created UI elements on touch screens that could not be used comfortably or efficiently with your fingers.
Yep.So MS just went ahead and did what Apple had patent on 2010?
You very much underestimate Apple.If Apple would stop dragging their feet and make a "Pro" OS for the iPad "PRO" this would be a moot point.
MacBooks have the touchpad (which is fantastic, and a major reason I buy these computers in the first place), putting a touchscreen on them would just be redundant.
As far as desktops go, it would seem out of place really. Most people I know prefer using a mouse+keyboard for their desktops anyway. And Apple has the Magic Trackpad so that makes the touchscreen pointless again.
ARM chips on Macs? Please, Intel's processors would outclass any processor that Apple could put out on its own. It would just put Apple farther behind in the hardware department (which is something they cannot afford). On top of that, there's no guarantee that programs that everybody already uses would continue to work on the theoretical proprietary chips. AND macOS would have to be ported to ARM chips (since it's x86-64 based).
At this point Apple's just stating the obvious.
but since you don't seem to own a 2016 MBP, you really don't know how useful the TouchBar actually IS.I now own a touchscreen PC laptop in addition to my old MBP and Schiller is flat out wrong. While I don't use the touchscreen feature every day, it's very nice to fold the keyboard back (it's a convertable) and scroll through webpages, facebook and other programs as a giant 4K tablet.
By contrast, the touchbar has very limited usefulness in my opinion and seems to be a poor substitute for a touch screen.
Considering it was a Calligraphy class he took that inspired him to have Fonts on the Mac, with actual kerning and ligatures, I think you are correct!I really think Steve would've loved the Pencil. He probably would have spent hours just doodling with it, or using it to sign stuff, or even saying it'll revolutionize calligraphy.
ARM and Atom architectures are nowhere near similar - not a good comparison. Although I will agree Atom chips sucked.
i'm sure he has done concept drawings; but Apple doesn't wasn't to cannibalize either product's market segments, and such a product would essentially have to BE an iPad and Mac, sharing a display and other peripherals, and running both iOS and macOS.It's hard to believe that Joni Ive hasn't whipped up a magical and revolutionary touch screen MacBook / Yoga-killa.
Lack of macOS on iPads is a feature, not a bug. The people clamouring for a desktop operating system or legacy PC features like a file manager on a tablet are the minority. They just don't know it yet.
I imagine we will see an updated Apple keyboard with a touch bar.
It will prob cost an arm and a leg.
but since you don't seem to own a 2016 MBP, you really don't know how useful the TouchBar actually IS.
Without reading through hundreds of posts, has anyone thought of integrating an iPhone or iPad as a touchscreen device to control a Mac, as a potentially much more sophisticated version of the touchbar?
I am wondering the amount of creative designer using Apple Pencil to produce their artwork. I think designer will prefer paper and real pencil. I don't think Apple Pencil receive as good adoption as Magic Mouse/Keyboard etc.
A much valued opinion on technology.Got bad news for you from the godfather of turntables, Grandmaster Flash says Touchbars are for fools and poseurs:
https://www.cnet.com/news/grandmaster-flash-apple-macbook-touch-bar-djs-twitch-sxsw/
And get the "Awesome" Windows 10 with it!
Wotta Deal!![]()
Yeah, I am 100% positive we will eventually see a touchscreen Mac. Apple will give in.
They're all correct. Touchscreen iMacs nobody wants.
That said, I feel like there will be a major shift of power for that company who does go solely into something massive, that is a touchscreen futuristic screen thing, 'Minority Report' style, and designs that tech for the future. It'll just be a complete overhaul, not Windows or MacOS with touch. Something completely different. One day. Maybe.
Yep, what I'm sayin'. And ergonomically, raising your arm to touch-control a vertical-ish screen is terrible. This is just an area where Apple should continue not to follow.which iPad are you using? I am using 9.7" iPad Pro, the performance is outperform than my company window Dekstop by a lot (3 times i guess).
[doublepost=1491439537][/doublepost]
Exactly, so I don't see a point to have hand move away from the keyboard area. Everything can be done comfortably on trackpad. Probably this is reason why they make the trackpad on MacbookPro that huge.