Apple Says It Has No Plans for Solely ARM-Based or Touchscreen Macs

Did Apple actually say no to ARM based MAC?
I don't think so though.

I would welcome ARM based MAC as I see the consistent performance of ARM on iOS.
 
I bet this was the reason for the delayed Mac Pro. Apple thought they could introduce a Mac Pro ARM but the project was not a success.
That's the weirdest interpretation of the Mac Pro delay I've seen. Mostly likely it was a combination of several things: 1) Waiting for CPU & GPU updates that fit inside the power envelope of the machine, 2) Hoping that people would simply all decide to use iMacs and settle for mobility GPUs, and 3) Neglect. The Mac Pro is absolutely NOT where ARM will be making its debut. Should you find yourself buying an ARM based Mac, it'll be at the low end of the compute-spectrum: the MacBook.
[doublepost=1491437972][/doublepost]
Did Apple actually say no to ARM based MAC?
I don't think so though.

I would welcome ARM based MAC as I see the consistent performance of ARM on iOS.
Maybe. But if I have a long document on my iPad and a long document on my Mac, and I do a search on both of them, the Mac's response is instantaneous. The iPad's most definitely isn't.
 
Funny....
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/8/1...s-full-windows-10-with-photoshop-on-arm-chips
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rm-server-chips-threatening-intel-s-dominance

Microsoft is still making a heavy push into ARM on both the consumer/professional markets.
Who gives a **** what platform software runs on as long as it runs in the most efficient manner?

for me mostly, its more about performance per dollar. ARM chips are efficient, yes, but are they the most powerful? If Apple comes out with a $2000 machine with an ARM processor which has 1/4th the compute power of an intel chip, but only costs Apple 1/4th as much as an Intel CPU but the MSRP remains the same? People will revolt, no matter how efficient it is.
[doublepost=1491438301][/doublepost]
Lack of macOS on iPads is a feature, not a bug. The people clamouring for a desktop operating system or legacy PC features like a file manager on a tablet are the minority. They just don't know it yet.

statements like this always make me ask the question, what begat what? did people start not needing to have access to a filesystem? or did years of making the filesystem difficult or unavailable simply make them accustomed to not having access to it, and forget about it?
 
I use a Dell all-in-one at work that has a touchscreen. I dont use it much but its nice to have as I sometimes use it when scrolling a PDF or doing pinch to zoom. Its not catastrophically bad as apple makes it out to be...

Its not something you will use often but its nice to have an option.
Apple laptop trackpads support gestures, enabling you to do just that without having to reach forward off the keyboard surface and get grubby fingerprints all over that beautiful screen.
 
That's the weirdest interpretation of the Mac Pro delay I've seen. Mostly likely it was a combination of several things: 1) Waiting for CPU & GPU updates that fit inside the power envelope of the machine, 2) Hoping that people would simply all decide to use iMacs and settle for mobility GPUs, and 3) Neglect. The Mac Pro is absolutely NOT where ARM will be making its debut. Should you find yourself buying an ARM based Mac, it'll be at the low end of the compute-spectrum: the MacBook.
[doublepost=1491437972][/doublepost]
Maybe. But if I have a long document on my iPad and a long document on my Mac, and I do a search on both of them, the Mac's response is instantaneous. The iPad's most definitely isn't.

which iPad are you using? I am using 9.7" iPad Pro, the performance is outperform than my company window Dekstop by a lot (3 times i guess).
[doublepost=1491439537][/doublepost]
Apple laptop trackpads support gestures, enabling you to do just that without having to reach forward off the keyboard surface and get grubby fingerprints all over that beautiful screen.

Exactly, so I don't see a point to have hand move away from the keyboard area. Everything can be done comfortably on trackpad. Probably this is reason why they make the trackpad on MacbookPro that huge.
 
Exactly. I've glanced at PC's for a while now - I really, really dislike windows, but the raw specs for the price is getting very attractive. Some, like Dell, even has hardware like this shipping with Ubuntu on them, which is the next best thing after OS X imo. And, there are github repos that are making basically one-click hackintosh installs with auto-update features for these devices as well, meaning you won't have to tinker for weeks trying to get OS X to run on them. While it's not 100% matured yet, I think getting hardware like this and run OS X flawlessly on it is pretty close. Can't wait.

I may have to check that out - if I could dual boot OS X on the Spectre it would be perfect. As much as I love Linux on the server side (I'm a Linux admin by day) I'm not sold on it on the desktop and I'll never ever buy anything Dell.

I don't hate Apple - they just have nothing appealing to me now especially given their insane price points.
 
You have to read that quote in context. Do you really think Steve Jobs thought software for drawing or painting was an inappropriate use for a tablet? Apple has not introduced a "stylus" in the sense he was talking about - a tool used to navigate a touch UI. That is what he was talking about - Apple would have "blown it" had they ever created UI elements on touch screens that could not be used comfortably or efficiently with your fingers.

I am wondering the amount of creative designer using Apple Pencil to produce their artwork. I think designer will prefer paper and real pencil. I don't think Apple Pencil receive as good adoption as Magic Mouse/Keyboard etc.
 
So MS just went ahead and did what Apple had patent on 2010?
Yep.
[doublepost=1491440420][/doublepost]
If Apple would stop dragging their feet and make a "Pro" OS for the iPad "PRO" this would be a moot point.

MacBooks have the touchpad (which is fantastic, and a major reason I buy these computers in the first place), putting a touchscreen on them would just be redundant.

As far as desktops go, it would seem out of place really. Most people I know prefer using a mouse+keyboard for their desktops anyway. And Apple has the Magic Trackpad so that makes the touchscreen pointless again.

ARM chips on Macs? Please, Intel's processors would outclass any processor that Apple could put out on its own. It would just put Apple farther behind in the hardware department (which is something they cannot afford). On top of that, there's no guarantee that programs that everybody already uses would continue to work on the theoretical proprietary chips. AND macOS would have to be ported to ARM chips (since it's x86-64 based).

At this point Apple's just stating the obvious.
You very much underestimate Apple.
 
They're all correct. Touchscreen iMacs nobody wants.

That said, I feel like there will be a major shift of power for that company who does go solely into something massive, that is a touchscreen futuristic screen thing, 'Minority Report' style, and designs that tech for the future. It'll just be a complete overhaul, not Windows or MacOS with touch. Something completely different. One day. Maybe.
 
Wow I feel bad for you guys, yeah I know you don't want my pity. I'd never go back to a primitive non touch device even if you paid me. Schiller's solution if you want touch is to downgrade the OS to iOS. But hey I own Apple stock so I like the fact that you have to buy 2 Apple devices. This is just my own opinion though, I know many of you use your devices differently. I'd personally just rather have the choice even if I only used it occasionally.
 
I now own a touchscreen PC laptop in addition to my old MBP and Schiller is flat out wrong. While I don't use the touchscreen feature every day, it's very nice to fold the keyboard back (it's a convertable) and scroll through webpages, facebook and other programs as a giant 4K tablet.

By contrast, the touchbar has very limited usefulness in my opinion and seems to be a poor substitute for a touch screen.
but since you don't seem to own a 2016 MBP, you really don't know how useful the TouchBar actually IS.
[doublepost=1491443510][/doublepost]
I really think Steve would've loved the Pencil. He probably would have spent hours just doodling with it, or using it to sign stuff, or even saying it'll revolutionize calligraphy.
Considering it was a Calligraphy class he took that inspired him to have Fonts on the Mac, with actual kerning and ligatures, I think you are correct!
 
ARM and Atom architectures are nowhere near similar - not a good comparison. Although I will agree Atom chips sucked.

I was amazed at how fast that system was. Really... It was fast, but when the going got tough, the Atom kinda curled up in a ball and sobbed.

BUT for basic stuff, surfing, light document editing, it was really surprisingly capable. But for the average one step over a document jockey, it's going to blow. Anything higher, it'll blow chunks...
 
Without reading through hundreds of posts, has anyone thought of integrating an iPhone or iPad as a touchscreen device to control a Mac, as a potentially much more sophisticated version of the touchbar?
 
It's hard to believe that Joni Ive hasn't whipped up a magical and revolutionary touch screen MacBook / Yoga-killa.
i'm sure he has done concept drawings; but Apple doesn't wasn't to cannibalize either product's market segments, and such a product would essentially have to BE an iPad and Mac, sharing a display and other peripherals, and running both iOS and macOS.
 
Lack of macOS on iPads is a feature, not a bug. The people clamouring for a desktop operating system or legacy PC features like a file manager on a tablet are the minority. They just don't know it yet.

Wrong. If you were paying attention not just to the Chinese market but globally, tablet sales have slowed down which means people are growing bored with it. The thrill of tablets of died down and so has the iPad, no matter how HARD Apple tries to hype it up.

The hype is DEAD. The need for laptops or desktops far outweigh tablets. Do you know what I see people do in cafes locally in this college town? Laptops for the majority. The minority use iPads...wait for it....to READ, check emails or browse. There are some who use iPads to write, mainly for student work. I should know because I see college students at the cafe all the time. In fact, you'd be surprised that there are some Windows and Chrome laptops being used a lot lately in the academic world.

So trust me, desktop OSes are not in the minority. You need a proper file system. Anyone who thinks iOS is going to be the one and only OS to do heavy duty lifting is a fool.
 
I am wondering the amount of creative designer using Apple Pencil to produce their artwork. I think designer will prefer paper and real pencil. I don't think Apple Pencil receive as good adoption as Magic Mouse/Keyboard etc.

I'm a creative professional and I use both a Wacom tablet and iPad Pro with styluses. They're both equally good. Second, as far as paper/pen goes, that's usually for brainstorming purposes or figuring out visual problems when it comes to design thinking. You would be surprised that many digital artists use the Pencil for their design or illustration work. Also, when it comes to logo or page layout work, styluses are handy to work out the visuals and then it's built out on a vector or page layout program.

Today, most of what you see is all digitally done. Look at comics. Many of them ink them digitally and colored on Photoshop ( or similar ).
 
I guess a re-visit to the round table could be a good thing, but perhaps that's "why" the table is round ? People keep bringing it up ? just a thought...

If Apple says No the first why, why would u keep coming back and Apple will finally give in by the 100th time ?

Stranger things have eventually come out of the wood work, but if Apple was serious about Mac Touchscreens don't you think there would of been a few 'hints' already? We always hear about things a year or so ahead,, evidence in log file pointing to rumors of something exiting, a patent here and there...

So i don't get why users refuse to take this..? Maybe Apple will spring us all by surprise..... but i don't see it happening.
 
And get the "Awesome" Windows 10 with it!

Wotta Deal! :rolleyes:

Windows 10 may not be perfect of a solution, but Microsoft had the guts to make the Surface Studio happen. Apple wussed out, no matter how much they make 'gorilla arm' excuses. Schiller is flat out wrong on that aspect. Sure, there's iPad but a true touchscreen workhorse in desktop form is what's needed. It's not like you have to have touch, but it is a nice addition to have including the mouse and keyboard input. That's where Microsoft got right by utilizing all forms of input to allow flexibility.
[doublepost=1491445469][/doublepost]
Yeah, I am 100% positive we will eventually see a touchscreen Mac. Apple will give in.

They're not going to have a choice but to do it. They know it. The reason, I greatly suspect, is that they came up with this line of thinking is to cover up the fact that they're AFRAID to make touchscreen Macs that would put them in a hypocritical light in an act of indirect admission. They know if they do it, they're admitting that they're in the wrong and Microsoft had the right idea.

Why can't Apple grow the hell up and applaud Microsoft for the Surface Studio just like how Sony and Microsoft congratulated Nintendo for the Switch release? The video game industry may be competitive but the rivalry is friendly and professional. It shows that they have reverent respect for Nintendo's presence and understood Nintendo's history in that aspect.

Apple is like a popular girl in high school with her nose turned up trying to hold on to her clique in control.
[doublepost=1491446368][/doublepost]
They're all correct. Touchscreen iMacs nobody wants.

That said, I feel like there will be a major shift of power for that company who does go solely into something massive, that is a touchscreen futuristic screen thing, 'Minority Report' style, and designs that tech for the future. It'll just be a complete overhaul, not Windows or MacOS with touch. Something completely different. One day. Maybe.

That kind of exists now. What we see these days on touch screens with multi-touch is the start of that. However, it's the use of Virtual Reality goggles and specialized gloves (which recognize finger and wrist movements ) that's going to be part of that direction. VR/AR combined with gloves will be what you saw in "Minority Report". Especially with ideas that are light years ahead seen on "Ghost in the Shell" ( anime and manga version ), the android was using a VR/trans-humanist dive into the operating system to navigate.

If you look at the classic anime series ".hack", that shows how the main character would lie down on his bed in his room, put on the VR goggles and take a 'dive' into the gaming world. The virtual dive is going to come around the corner, to which if I'm not mistaken, that concept was started by William Gibson's Neuromancer novel in the early 1980s. Yes, THE 1980s :).

It's already here but needs to be developed further into an actual computer. I'll bet you that one day there will be a full desktop class computer embedded into a VR/AR unit that's lightweight to interact with ( not to be used when driving, mind you ).

They already have gloves out there to detect hand movement to interact with the virtual environment. I'd give it another 10 years, maybe less, when they're perfected.

Oh, and one more thing. Microsoft has HoloLens so that's part of this vision you're talking about :). Look it up.
 
Last edited:
which iPad are you using? I am using 9.7" iPad Pro, the performance is outperform than my company window Dekstop by a lot (3 times i guess).
[doublepost=1491439537][/doublepost]

Exactly, so I don't see a point to have hand move away from the keyboard area. Everything can be done comfortably on trackpad. Probably this is reason why they make the trackpad on MacbookPro that huge.
Yep, what I'm sayin'. And ergonomically, raising your arm to touch-control a vertical-ish screen is terrible. This is just an area where Apple should continue not to follow.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top