Personally my keyboard performs well. I haven’t really had any trouble with it. The only abnormality is that several keys around the center of the keyboard feel “sticky” soon after the discrete GPU is working hard and the CPU is under load. Soon after the work is finished, usually rendering video, the keys all perform normally. I never have repeating keys or any sort of missed input.
It makes sense since these keys are directly above the CPU/GPU area on the logic board. Since I’m usually not typing documents while I’m working with video, it’s not really an inconvenience for me and is the reason why I haven’t requested any service. I would hate to replace my 2016 keyboard to get a 2017 replacement that actually has problems.
I guess I will wait longer to see what happens. Perhaps after supplies are exhausted, they will replace 2016s with whatever MBP is on the market at that time. My AppleCare lasts until 12/19 and the keyboard warranty until 12/20. That is long enough and by then stock of 2017 top cases should be depleted.
In fact I would prefer the 2017-present design with the control and option symbols that look better along with the command symbol.
[doublepost=1531768784][/doublepost]
The dimensions of the machines have no changed. So it has to be a deeper internal change to etch out more than an extra 1mm or so. This returns to the key question of the layer being a patch to a problem or actually a solution. A patch being the problem still exists due to the small travel etc and a solution being that it was purely accumulation of rubbish in the keys. If it was just dust, then surely most users with problems could clear it themselves. Also if dust etc, its costing Apple a fortune in HR and repair times just for defence which brings us full circle to a flawed design.
The only change is the increased battery capacity. This may affect the layout. I would expect the logic board design to be very much the same since the 2018s are still part of the 4th generation. It would be a different story if the 2018 were a new design with a totally new chassis.
[doublepost=1531768989][/doublepost]
The dimensions of the machines have no changed. So it has to be a deeper internal change to etch out more than an extra 1mm or so. This returns to the key question of the layer being a patch to a problem or actually a solution. A patch being the problem still exists due to the small travel etc and a solution being that it was purely accumulation of rubbish in the keys. If it was just dust, then surely most users with problems could clear it themselves. Also if dust etc, its costing Apple a fortune in HR and repair times just for defence which brings us full circle to a flawed design.
The worst problems are definitely due to dust and debris. Those that eat while using these machines or leave them open on a desk for long periods of time are more likely to have problems than those who don’t. Apple leadership probably wouldn’t encounter problems since they probably are always using almost brand new machines and prototypes. They most likely won’t be using the same notebook for a year much less a couple of years.