When I see the same posters saying the same things for no reason other than to hate, I just add them to my ignore list. It makes it more tolerable.![]()
I guess that's what Apple has been doing for a few months, too. Ignoring their customers.
When I see the same posters saying the same things for no reason other than to hate, I just add them to my ignore list. It makes it more tolerable.![]()
Sounds like Tim is getting the message that there is a lot of negative comments about him lately.
I would expect him to brush it off, but it's good that the message is getting there.
I'm in the creative industry and I see them leaving in droves.
You mean generation 1 hasn't "caught on with the masses". Apple, nor most companies, has never had a generation 1 "catch on with the masses". Health is a giant business that continues to grow - their investment in the watch has the potential to pay off huge rewards. Hardly a waste of resources. You say they are "Playing catch-up on so many fronts" - oh please do enlighten us on all these "fronts" Apple is playing catch up on? Chips - no - hardware - no software - no (each platform has its +'s and -'s) AI - no - AI has not yet "caught on with the masses". Let's look at the numbers: $50.6 billion in sales, you need to combine Alphabet ($20.3 billion) and Amazon ($29.1 billion). $10.5 billion in profits you'd need to combine Alphabet ($4.2 billion), Amazon ($513 million), Facebook ($1.5 billion) and Microsoft ($3.8 billion). Who's playing catch-up?
Yes, some game consoles and digital video handling devices used embedded versions (and if you include IBM's POWER series, high-powered number crunchers used them as well). But they were different versions (the POWER ones quite different) than what Apple used. And in particular game consoles weren't in the business of coming out with new CPUs every six months. They got a custom CPU design and then kept it for several years.I don't think Apple was the only PPC user, didn't Nintendo use them on a few of their consoles?
It still annoys me the bare faced lying to the public.
He stands on stage and says to the worldwide public "We make the best computers we can"
Yet, he takes a desktop PC (iMac) fits a laptop low end GPU, and a 5400rpm physical hard drive.
Sorry Tim, But I don't like people who stand there and basically lie to my face.
For all we know, if Steve was with us today we'd be in the same situation in terms of product launches and updates and everyone would be calling for his head to be placed on the chopping block and wondering how he "lost his mojo".
Apple don't seem to have realised that is isn't the 1990s or early 2000s anymore. There is absolutely NOTHING that they bring to tech that cannot be got elsewhere, and in many cases the alternatives are BETTER than what Apple is producing.Well. there's one thing,,, the alternative, is i just stopped upgrading all APpl products and devices....
I now go "on my own" .. is it worth it? What extra thing will i get out of the next product /update to warrant "me" enough to update?
Neither has filled this hole for a long time... Which is why I am still on OS 10.10.5 all Mac's.. sig. explains much of it
If my Mac does eventually crock, then i'm looking for a PC.
Nvidia Shield TV makes the Apple TV look like a joke though. Well, actually, it is a joke.
The Nvidia Shield is a purpose-built mini gaming box. It looks like a stealth bomber - which is to say that it's appeal is squarely at young males, not the mainstream family market.
It is a totally different product with very different features and priorities. AppleTV has things like Siri which would make little sense on the Shield. That's where Apple put their engineering effort - targeted towards their market.
Maybe one is better suited to you than the other; that's why competition exists.
That's a ham-fisted way of looking at things.
- Nobody has good TV content packages. It's not Apple's fault; the people who own the rights are digging their heels in. What did Apple do instead? They created the AppleTV. It's early days, but the product is already quite successful and they are building the most attractive platform for TV out of anybody.
- Apple Watch took a long time? Do you know how long the iPhone took to develop? Can you appreciate the amount of work that is required to get a computer of that processing power in to a device you can wear on your wrist and that will still have battery life by the end of the day? I don't see anybody doing a better job of pushing that market forward than Apple is.
As Eddy Cue says in the interview, they are not perfect, and they never claimed to be. They can't just leapfrog 3,4 or 5 years of R&D like they were time-travellers. They try their best to create the best products they can, and for all their faults, they have a fleet of products which are all basically at the cutting-edge.
Or you're only as good as the last product Steve had a hand in.
Wasn't Timmy making fun of PC users with 5 year old machines? I do have a 512 gig SSD, 1TB HDD, and 16 gig of ram in the machine currently.
I agree, but that was also because of a limited product line (and let's not get started on clarity, structure and overall-simplicity which they have lost along the way.)Strange how Apple's software was considerably better when they DIDN'T have public beta testing.
Smart money is stealthily re-entering the stock. Short positions are starting to crash, leading to more buys in order to cover the shorts ("short squeeze"). It should go up to $113 with ease, but I suspect it will breach $120.
Current valuation is way too low; and factoring the cash position in, it's simply wrong.
Technicals aside, a huge pent up demand for MBPs has accumulated in the years; the new machines will blow past expectations. Also, Watch has been written off way too soon, and so was the iPhone 7, setting things up nicely for a monster, unexpectedly record-breaking holiday quarter, that could propel the stock to new highs, over $130.
That's why the stock is soaring.
Putting engineering and marketing resources into the Mac Pro at this time is probably a net loss for Apple considering how slow it must sell. Apple is probably deciding if they even want to keep it around before they go and plow money into it. Tim Cook is just doing what most CEOs do and that is focus on the products that have the best return for investment. Jobs was more of a visionary, whereas Cook is more of typical CEO that focuses on shareholder value and profit margin. Mac Pro (or most Macs for that matter) have a much lower profit margin then iPhone. I can't really blame them for focusing on the product line that makes the most money.
R&D spent was over $10 billion this year. Compared to $3 billion four years ago.
R&D takes time, and patience. Just like Google, who has spent tons of money researching dozens of things, all those billions that Apple is throwing into research will eventually yield a few successful products…. in the near future.