Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You all know that SemVer is a thing, and apple loosely follows it, right?
Well I've never considered that apple does loosely follow it.
If we’re being extremely technical, after 10.10 Yosemite, they started to make less and less sense. 10.1 and 10.10 are the exact same number. Obviously, puma and Yosemite are two different operating systems, but I think you get my point. 10.15, which was Catalina, is actually a smaller number than 10.2 jaguar was. So Apple attempting to get away from that confusing mess is something that I appreciate.
Yes, in decimals 10.10==10.1
But in software, 10.10 is what comes after 10.9 if you're not ready to release 11.0
Major dot minor dot patch, you +1 to patch for hotfixes, you +1 to minor for bugfixes, new features, new code, and you +1 to major only when introducing backwards-incompatible breaking changes.
 
Downloading. I'm glad I didn't waste my time going from RC2 to the final release of 11.0.1. What was odd is that despite not removing the beta profile, I was still prompted to upgrade. Took quite a bit of willpower to ignore it.

I do wish they'd put the beta release notes in Feedback *before* making the download available. Sure, I could just wait, but ... willpower gone.

EDIT: Very smooth upgrade to 11.1 Beta (20C5048k). Release notes contain very little - just some stuff about Catalyst and confirmation that there's no full installer, so can't go from Catalina to this beta in one step.
 
Last edited:
But in software, 10.10 is what comes after 10.9 if you're not ready to release 11.0
Major dot minor dot patch, you +1 to patch for hotfixes, you +1 to minor for bugfixes, new features, new code, and you +1 to major only when introducing backwards-incompatible breaking changes.

There are plenty of reasons to use "10.10" rather than "11.0" besides "not ready to release 11.0".

Also, that scheme for when specific version segments are incremented isn't outlandish, but it's far from the only one.

I don't think there's any reason to believe Apple actually follows semver - the major version number (which is normally the first number before the dot separator, but for Mac OS X / OS X / macOS versions from 10.0 till 10.11, the first two segments combined should be considered the major version) is not necessarily an indication of a BC break - it's more about marketing. The minor level has generally been about new features, and once it gets to patch level they play really fast and loose with numbers, "supplemental updates", additional dotted segments etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
You don't know how version numbers work, do you? 10.1 and 10.10 are not the same numbers because they aren't decimals.
Obviously. But still, Apple announcing macOS Catalina, or Mojave, or Yosemite, and calling it “ The biggest update in the history of the Mac,” but then calling at 10.13, 10.14, 10.15 is just a little bit ridiculous.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: JimmyBanks6
Obviously. But still, Apple announcing macOS Catalina, or Mojave, or Yosemite, and calling it “ The biggest update in the history of the Mac,” but then calling at 10.13, 10.14, 10.15 is just a little bit ridiculous.
I mean that’s Apple’s style though, every year they say the same thing.

“This is the fahstest iPhone we have ever made”

Well no **** Sherlock...
 
I mean that’s Apple’s style though, every year they say the same thing.

“This is the fahstest iPhone we have ever made”

Well no **** Sherlock...

You know that only one of the four iPhone models released this year is the faster iPhone ever made right?
 
Hoping for a Thunderbolt (Drobo) and SMB sharing fix as those are my two pain-points.
I moved my Drobo 5D from Thunderbolt to USB last night. Yeah, the speed went from 10Gbps to 5Gbps but I can’t say that I noticed.
 
Looks like I got fairly lucky, 2015 MBP 15” DG
Works smooth as silk with a few glitches in the music app, entering genre and hitting enter doesn’t work and occasionally completing an artist search and going to their albums reverts to a blank “searching for”
Also sync iPhone over WiFi seems to drop out when starting the sync, got to relaunch Finder a lot

most of my audio production apps also working as expected too.
Here’s hoping they patch some of that with this update :)
 
Yep. Fixed. Needed my coffee. ☕️
Coffee? Your username suggests otherwise :p

I am really curious why Apple decided to make the jump from point releases to now full digit upgrades.
they did it before with tvOS, but not with watchOS.
Perhaps at WWDC 2021 they will launch the fancy sounding “series 15” of their operating systems?
 
If we’re being extremely technical, after 10.10 Yosemite, they started to make less and less sense. 10.1 and 10.10 are the exact same number. Obviously, puma and Yosemite are two different operating systems, but I think you get my point. 10.15, which was Catalina, is actually a smaller number than 10.2 jaguar was. So Apple attempting to get away from that confusing mess is something that I appreciate.
What? You've got me confused. They are all 10 point something. Just going by the number after the point...10 is higher than 1. Not the same. 15 is bigger than 2. It's 15. Not 1.5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyBanks6
Actually, they used to bump the main number very frequently. macOS 1.0 came out in 1984, and by 1987 we were already at 5.0.
them only updating the decimal only started in 2001, and once we got to 10.10, it was starting to be a little bit ridiculous. so I actually support this change, kind of.
10.x was the OS based on NeXTStep iirc.

Im not sure how much of modern macOS is based on nextstep any longer.
 
I think this confirms that from now on, macOS will get a new version number every year.
so next year we’ll get 12.0, in 2022 we’ll get 13.0, etc.
Or, maybe Apple will start doing what everyones asking, and instead of releasing a new major version every year, they go back to the days where the current version is perfected over a 24 to 30 month period Before we move on.
to be honest, what irritates me more is that all of their operating systems now are on different version numbers. macOS 11, iOS 14, watchOS 7.
let’s unify that. Since next year, we’ll get iOS 15, tvOS 15, and HomePod OS 15, let’s just bump all of the version numbers to 15.
Apple has skipped version numbers in the past, and so has Microsoft, and every other computer company.
or maybe, instead of making things this ultra complex, just introduce all the new operating systems with the year, instead of using the actual version number in marketing.
so next year, at WWDC, Apple would just say “our lineup of operating systems for 2021.”
it makes sense, Microsoft is already doing that, and macOS 11.0.1 isn’t technically 11.0.1. It can actually display itself as macOS 10.16 for applications that won’t support something without a 10 at the beginning.
on top of that, when Apple introduces these major versions, not all the features launch at the same time. iOS 13.0 did not include all the features that it was promised to include. We had to wait until 13.4 to get every single feature. So maybe, if Apple just started introducing them by year, that wouldn’t matter as much.
Man if this is all you got to worry about version numbers your lucky people are dying all over the world from COVID and your worried about software numbers. Omg. I would rather see the software work as explained at wwdc then crash peoples macs, iPhones or iPads the number might move forward but the software is not. With more bugs then ever. Really.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.