I agree with wanting it RIGHT...but Apple needs to remember to heed the greatest marketing rule: "under-promise and over-deliver". They should never have mentioned "end of October" at all.
Apple has provided no new estimate for a launch date for the iTunes Match service.
Isn't it "amateur hour" to let your developers' betas expire? That really looks bad....
It could be bad if they released it before it was ready. Can you imagine how upset you would be, if it gave you access to songs that were not in your library?
Isn't it "amateur hour" to let your developers' betas expire? That really looks bad....
Apple TV Support FTW
Not sure why.
AppleTV is setup at home on my network, and connects to my Mac for all of my iTunes content. aka Home Sharing.
iTunes Match is redundant.
Not sure why.
AppleTV is setup at home on my network, and connects to my Mac for all of my iTunes content. aka Home Sharing.
iTunes Match is redundant.
If you have iTunes Match + iCloud, your Mac doesn't have to be on to stream iTunes content to your Apple TV.
That's why they added it.
Then download the newer beta. What is the problem? Are you a developer or not?
Really? I'd say letting people use an old beta for ages is even more amateurish, but who am I to talk.
One group that may have been caught off-guard by the delayed iTunes Match launch is Apple's developers, who have been testing the service for a number of months. Apple has repeatedly wiped users' iTunes Match libraries during the beta testing process, with the most recent wipe occurring last Thursday.
But those developers who have continued testing the service are now discovering that their iTunes 10.5.1 betas have expired, leaving them unable to launch the application as of today with no public launch and no new beta release.
They don't mention that the libraries may be reset (The have mentioned that in every other beta release), so that could mean this is just to get all of the developers updated before releasing it to the world in the next day or two.
----------
This sucks. I bought my 16GB 4S because I could store all my music on it with Match. I've been waiting...
If I understand correctly, Apple wants me - the average Mac-fan - to pay $25 a year in order to:
1. Lose control and privacy over my music library.
2. Become completely dependent on a good internet connection at any time.
3. Become completely dependent on iCloud to work well and smoothly at any time.
4. Listen to all my stuff on downgraded quality.
I certainly missed something, but I'll stick to old school methods:
1. I'm the only one to rule over my music collection. I decide who to share my music with. I'm still the king in my little network
2. I can listen to anything I like everywhere, anytime, even if the net's not available
3. My music collection (with backup) is stored in my iPod and hard drives that I have physical control over. If anything fails I see it right away and can deal with it
4. All my stuff has a bit rate of at least 320 kbps and I don't want anything less ... even if my ears can't hear the difference
5. I'll spend $25 a year on music instead![]()