Oh really now? And if MS Office wasn't even considered "defacto-standard" in the business world then Windows wouldn't be all that widely used either since it wouldn't have any particular "trump card" software. Not a good argument.If MS Office wasn't available for macOS, then this attempt to appeal to enterprise would be dead in the water.
Then please explain how the enterprise world has no problems making the iPad the only tablet used and it's a $1000 non-modular device that can still fail and needs to be replaced.And they have a legitimate reason why. Because...
This is why IT doesn't want to support Macs. Look at it from the IT perspective. If RAM/SSD starts acting flakey, they have to replace the whole machine, which means worker looses all their data/work. Worker gets mad at IT guy for not replacing RAM/SSD, because those are replacable/upgradable in PCs.
Apple has no plans, secret or otherwise, to lock down macOS. MacOS needs to stay open because it is Apple's development platform. Developers need open systems to be productive. Apple has said explicitly that they have no plans to lock down macOS. If anything, they just released an API to allow alternate kernels to boot on the M1 which is being used successfully by the Asahi Linux porting project.I.e., their NOT-so-secret plans to Lock Down macOS !
It's actually worse than that. Since Apple refuses to support the displayport MST spec, you can't connect a USB docking station to a mac and have it power multiple monitors. You'll need to connect a 2nd cable to your mac specifically for the 2nd monitor.I'll agree with 1paine1 here, it sucks. The Intel MacBook Airs allowed for two external monitors and the M1s do not. To use dual external monitors (even in clamshell mode) you have to use a DisplayLink enabled device and make the software part of the deployment. On top of that, it requires screen recording access which the end-user has to set up.
I work in IT (supporting a few hundred users) and replacing the whole computer is not as big a problem as you seem to be making out. While users shouldn't be storing important information on their laptops anyway, we make sure their profiles are all backed up online, so it doesn't matter if they need a new computer. People lose their laptops too/get stolen. So you always need to have spares you can give them (or risk them not being able to work for a few days).And they have a legitimate reason why. Because...
This is why IT doesn't want to support Macs. Look at it from the IT perspective. If RAM/SSD starts acting flakey, they have to replace the whole machine, which means worker looses all their data/work. Worker gets mad at IT guy for not replacing RAM/SSD, because those are replacable/upgradable in PCs.
If Apple wants the enterprise business, they need to make Macs flexible/modular so an IT guy can get the worker back up and running in the shortest time possible. Ugly PC business machines can have its RAM or HD or video card or PS replaced and running again in 5-10 minutes.
Not to put words into Cosmosent's mouth but i suspect the lock down plans was for a default acos install, not for an api to boot a third party os. ( partly to placate the eu etc), ue not leave the hw unusable whe apple decides to stop updating the osApple has no plans, secret or otherwise, to lock down macOS. MacOS needs to stay open because it is Apple's development platform. Developers need open systems to be productive. Apple has said explicitly that they have no plans to lock down macOS. If anything, they just released an API to allow alternate kernels to boot on the M1 which is being used successfully by the Asahi Linux porting project.
Enterprises often run software that normal people never heard of and these software usually only available on Windows platform.
Excellent post and very well stated 👍🏼! Unfortunately you're wasting your time posting facts when people here just want to crap on Apple just because. They will ignore your facts, just because.I work in IT (supporting a few hundred users) and replacing the whole computer is not as big a problem as you seem to be making out. While users shouldn't be storing important information on their laptops anyway, we make sure their profiles are all backed up online, so it doesn't matter if they need a new computer. People lose their laptops too/get stolen. So you always need to have spares you can give them (or risk them not being able to work for a few days).
Plus there are lots of PC laptops which are just as hard to fix as Macs (e.g. MS Surfaces). But there is one big reason I have found over the covid period to recommend M1 Macs. Many Intel based laptops (especially the small ones) just can't cope running Zoom/Teams 8 hours a day, by about mid afternoon they will often start to overheat and throttle down the speed to the point where the computer becomes unusable. M1 Macs don't have this issue.
I completely agree, however the issue (at least with my company) is software. Using Macs is a non-starter if the special software you use can only run on Windows (and will never run on anything else).Schools and businesses are now foolish to ignore Apple, even if they want to run Windows. The M1 architecture has truly turned the industry on its nose in terms of low-power high-performance computing, and this is just the beginning.
Ridiculous and absurd. Very few schools and only a handful of businesses will have Windows-only software. This is not year 1999. 🙄I completely agree, however the issue (at least with my company) is software. Using Macs is a non-starter if the special software you use can only run on Windows (and will never run on anything else).
I work for one of the largest public companies in the US and we have a Mac deployment of around 50k machines and growing.
Any bespoke Windows only software is handled via Citrix VM, or in rare cases using Parallels/Virtual Box on the local machine. This has been a solved problem for 10+ years.
Agree with v3rlon especially when using keyboard shortcuts via spectacle app. Multiple monitors works much better on mac than windows for me.How is using multiple monitors hard on a mac? Plug them in and they work. My multiple windows monitors at work don't plug themselves in, and I have to choose extend over mirror the first time, so the pain seems about equal there.
Why would any businesses want to add extra cost and complexity to their IT infrastructure when they can use Widows directly at lower cost?I work for one of the largest public companies in the US and we have a Mac deployment of around 50k machines and growing.
Any bespoke Windows only software is handled via Citrix VM, or in rare cases using Parallels/Virtual Box on the local machine. This has been a solved problem for 10+ years.
I worked at IBM with Mac. Saved the company money and worked for me with multiple monitors. Much better than Windows experience. The savings claim looks similar to IBM vs PC(Del and Lenovo). All automated deployment and security.Apple almost goes out of its way to make these things a pain for businesses. I have been trying for many years and it only gets worse. Something as easy as using two monitors is a gigantic hassle. Maybe invest in your product to convince us, not your marketing!
Agree. I found alternatives to Windows legacy apps. Most business application today are delivered via browser. Now that .NET is open source and Mono runs many Windows applications it was not a problem for me. I also switched from Office suite of products to Keynote, numbers, and Pages for my business productivity tasks. The import export tasks I got good at which was the biggest issue. In the end more productive with Mac. And less of an issue.Why would any businesses want to add extra cost and complexity to their IT infrastructure when they can use Widows directly at lower cost?