If there's one show that will get me to subscribe, this one is it. Aerospace and national pride? Check and check.
Seems kind of disrespectful to try and piggyback the marketing of a show whose premise is we failed to make it to the moon first on the anniversary of the successful moon landing.
Not saying the show couldn’t be interesting, just not digging the disrespect. I won’t be watching though, because I don’t need any more TV subscriptions.
I hope Apple will have enough brains to not cancel such series in favour of some better selling dumb celebrity shows.The team is getting stories and scripts ready, but Apple hasn't yet officially picked it up for a second season.
Don’t know if you’re sarcastic or not, but plenty of people believe conspiracy theories nowadays. Climate change, the Theory of evolution, round Earth, vaccinations, ... it’s all disbelieved because of politics, religion, or simply because it’s too complex. A very sad evolution. Why does everyone have to have an opinion on everything? Even the stuff they don’t understand.I thought the original sci-fi show aired 50 years ago?
No worries, it's just a show. In the real world US system brought us a perfect human existence.I'm sure the show will portray a utopian future (current present time) where the Soviet system brought us a perfect human existence. How stupid.
Honestly, easier to just fly to the moon than fake flying to the moon. Yeah, it’s all fake and that satellite system that works our global GPS and mapping systems just magically happened. All smoke and mirrors, tin foil hat man.
Clearly it's not flat... It's hollow.Oh yeah, and earth is flat yall!
It was never a matter of capability or technology (after we got there the first time), it's always been a matter of determination. The public lost interest after the first couple moon walks, and the push was to spend the money elsewhere (in part by continuing a disastrous and costly field trip to Vietnam). NASA had lots of plans, most of them were shut down when the funding got pulled. The last several Apollo missions got cancelled, and a couple of already-built real live Saturn V rockets went to museums. We could go back again, if we as a nation (or a planet) had the will to do so.What really fascinates me and I find it quite bizarre is after 50 years we never managed to go back! Especially with today's outstanding technology!
It was never a matter of capability or technology (after we got there the first time), it's always been a matter of determination. The public lost interest after the first couple moon walks, and the push was to spend the money elsewhere (in part by continuing a disastrous and costly field trip to Vietnam). NASA had lots of plans, most of them were shut down when the funding got pulled. The last several Apollo missions got cancelled, and a couple of already-built real live Saturn V rockets went to museums. We could go back again, if we as a nation (or a planet) had the will to do so.
Don’t know if you’re sarcastic or not, but plenty of people believe conspiracy theories nowadays. Climate change, the Theory of evolution, round Earth, vaccinations, ... it’s all disbelieved because of politics, religion, or simply because it’s too complex. A very sad evolution. Why does everyone have to have an opinion on everything? Even the stuff they don’t understand.
But I came here to have an opinion on the name and logo of the Apple TV service. I haven’t been a fan of the iOS logos for a long time (I’m looking at you hideous camera app icon) and this newest one isn’t turning the tide.
Also, the plus monicker for paid services is getting old. I would expect something more original from Apple.
Yeah we were all smokers back then because 4 out of 5 doctors recommended Kent cigarettes.Nobody had teeth that white back then. It's just not realistic.
Never watch The man in the high castle then, let alone read the original novel by Philip K. Dick, in that one you lost WWII....
Oh I get it haha because it was all fake right
I still don’t know how to feel about apple doing tv shows. Sounds like they didn’t know what to do with the money. There was no real reason to step into a business full of other services.
..but any way, how sustainable this ATV+ service is in long term? Like, 5 + year from now, will they still be making only their own shows?
I am with you on this one and I have no doubts they went to the moon back then.
What really fascinates me and I find it quite bizarre is after 50 years we never managed to go back! Especially with today's outstanding technology!
Of course, of course.I thought the original sci-fi show aired 50 years ago?
It costs billions of dollars, and after about 6 trips to the moon they realized it's not all that interesting. Just a lot of the same moon rock they found the first 5 times.
You want to fund the incredible expense to see nothing more than you saw previously?
It costs billions of dollars, and after about 6 trips to the moon they realized it's not all that interesting. Just a lot of the same moon rock they found the first 5 times.
You want to fund the incredible expense to see nothing more than you saw previously?
It costs billions of dollars, and after about 6 trips to the moon they realized it's not all that interesting. Just a lot of the same moon rock they found the first 5 times.
You want to fund the incredible expense to see nothing more than you saw previously?
With that logic there is nothing interesting in space.
You must be a Gemini
You obviously don't know much about the Moon!
So yeah, we did some Moonwalk and we learned all that is to learn about it? No! There is plenty of mysteries surrounding Moon (which is in our doorstep)
Incredibly expensive? Yes
Not interesting? Those who are investing in Moon mining would disagree with you. And by the way, Moon may not be ideal for colonization but it has a lot of potentials for mining, raw materials and serve as a gateway if we want to move beyond our goldilocks zone. So yeah, is totally worth it.