Not much buying it if you aren't going to use Siri at all.To get the most out of it, don't use Siri, it is useless.
Not much buying it if you aren't going to use Siri at all.To get the most out of it, don't use Siri, it is useless.
So Siri works just fine then, unlike the amazon and google fans are telling us?I have a large open floor plan loft. Nowhere was safe to watch the video without my Homepod responding to the narrator's voice. I'm presently listening to "Party Music" that has been interrupted with an attempt to send a text message and a read out of the weather. Not really complaining, just thought it was funny.
Well, depends on whether your money is your money or her money...You are a very lucky person. I’m trying to convince my gf that I need another for the living room. The reply is “it’s your money”, but I think we can all read between the lines there...
Please forgive me for my bad English, its' not my native language.
So, let me try again. I am a huge Apple fan. I am using Apple devices for almost 10 years now.
And I will repeat it again......if Home .......Pod can't be used as a bluetooth speaker with any other device, not even with MBP it is just plain stupid. Thank you.
The Sonos founder says they're not in the same ballpark and I've actually compared them and they're not in the same ballpark. Funny, how actual facts seem to not matter at all. No, not close to same ballpark especially when your not using it in a traditional living room space where you can sit just in front of the speakers. That's most use case in many houses.
To get the most out of it, don't use Siri, it is useless.
I think you got that wrong. The only thing most of them know about Sonos is that they are selling something that is trying to compete with an Apple product. That’s enough if someone hates Apple for whatever reason.Nah. It's a good apple product. You guys are just hardcore salty Sonos fanboys evangelizing/preaching their preferred product like you are offering heaven or second life. (or maybe you guys are just sockpuppets of Sonos to make some online noise)
Nah. It's a good apple product. You guys are just hardcore salty Sonos fanboys evangelizing/preaching their preferred product like you are offering heaven or second life. (or maybe you guys are just sockpuppets of Sonos to make some online noise)
Excellent idea.My HomePod was SO confused with me playing this video out loud. I now also have a reminder to make more cookies in an hour.
That’s probably because it’s the HomePod playing the music, so it takes the microphone input and subtracts what it is playing itself.I have both, Sonos are good in small rooms like my office and bathroom. The HP is amazing in my living room. The Play:1 was ok in that space, but the HP fills the space with sound. And I still can't get over how Siri can hear you even when you have the music blasting.
I completely disagree. HomePod is a decent quality speaker that is tiny, fits into any living room, is very easy to set up, and sounds good everywhere in the room, even if the room is badly fit for quality sound.I completely disagree. HomePod is very good, simple, and intuitive *IF* you are an Apple Music subscriber. HomePod isn’t Apple’s home audio solution. It’s an Apple Music accessory. You want it to do things it was never designed or intended to do.
I’d expect the one that is further away to play a bit louder to compensate for the distance.If you say "Hey Siri volume 50" will both HomePods go to 50% volume?
I’m that case it’s your problem. iTunes on the Mbp plays on HomePod just fine without any Bluetooth.Please forgive me for my bad English, its' not my native language.
So, let me try again. I am a huge Apple fan. I am using Apple devices for almost 10 years now.
And I will repeat it again......if Home .......Pod can't be used as a bluetooth speaker with any other device, not even with MBP it is just plain stupid. Thank you.
Turn your home router off.If Apple cared so much about privacy, and Homepod could work standalone without any connection to phone or internet to do smart automation.. that would be huge.
If you give it a mono signal then it can only play plain mono. If you give left and right mono to two HomePods you get plain stereo at best.The question I have is how does a HomePod react being fed a purely mono signal (which is what it looks like Airfoil is doing sending L & R to each specific HomePod). How can a HomePod create a wide soundstage when it’s fed what is essentially a mono signal? How does the signal processing in the HomePod react when it doesn’t have a stereo signal where it can compare the audio content of both channels to decide how to create that soundstage?
Apples HomePad has not the slightest chance to kill Sonos at this price point with this limited usage possibility. I expect the usual "That's what they said about the iPod, iPhone etc." answer, but this time really IS different. At least if Apple doesn't open up the HomePod to other music services besides AppleMusic.
I suspect Apple’s solution is going to provide every bit as good of a stereo effect and perhaps even better.
You are WRONG. First, it's HomePod, not Home Pod. Second, it's with, not whit. Third, it's iPhone, not Iphone.
An iPhone or iPad is needed to set up HomePod. After that you can send music to it with any AirPlay compatible device.
But you already knew that when you posted. You only posted to troll the topic. Please go away.
Mark
[doublepost=1518987684][/doublepost]Either you know nothing about Sonos or you are trolling. Sonos offers a wide variety of home audio components, none of which compete with HomePod. Until Apple offers a HomePod sub, sound bar, surround sound support, and the ability to use one’s own speakers, Sonos has nothing to worry about. I have Sonance speakers built in to my walls and ceilings, all connected to Sonos Connect:Amp boxes. I can’t replicate this setup with HomePod. HomePod isn’t a home audio solution like Sonos offers. It’s an Apple Music accessory.
Sonos is a dead man walking...
I don't possess IKEA furnitureThe Sonos founder says they're not in the same ballpark and I've actually compared them and they're not in the same ballpark. Funny, how actual facts seem to not matter at all. No, not close to same ballpark especially when your not using it in a traditional living room space where you can sit just in front of the speakers. That's most use case in many houses.
[doublepost=1518977366][/doublepost]
You actually don't for most wood tables, just those with particular types of finishes that few have (because they're more delicate and fragile). You're Ikea wood tables don't need coasters/
Apple is selling it as an Apple Music accessory, primarily. You don’t have to like it, but they didn’t set out to do anything else nor do they claim it to be anything else.well, objectively, while Apple's competitors have created "smart" audio devices that embrace the entire ecosystem of audio options available to consumers, Apple has decided to wall out those who don't participate in their "pay wall". Tell me, what do you have to say about that?
Hey MR, where’s the dislike option?
Yeah not sure what they were thinking. Bluetooth should’ve been included , and that alone stops me from buying it. Hopefully HomePod 2 will have bluetooth but I doubt it will.
Really? You'd dislike a post pointing out that a $350 product of this type doesn't have Bluetooth connectivity? That's a no-brainer. I love Apple products, but there's nothing wrong with expecting better of them and pointing when they blew it. Not including the ability to stream audio from other devices via Bluetooth was a boneheaded move.
So much disdain for the HomePod. I’m curious how many have tested the HomePod before they actually disparage against the sound produced. Give this Product some time, it will continually improve though software updates.
You forgot one more thing. The Home does not leave a white ring on your wooden table.Google uses your information as a seperate revenue source
Home doesn’t work with Apple Music
Home doesn’t work with podcast app
Home doesn’t work with AirPlay and probably won’t ever work with Airplay 2
The Max is too big (and ugly) for many of the places people put HomePods
The Max doesn’t have 360 sound
The Max won’t get AirPlay 2 Control
You forgot one more thing. The Home does not leave a white ring on your wooden table.
Already have 2 Sonos Play:3 in a stereo pair..while it might have better app functionality, the sound is barely equal for that stereo pair compared to one HomePod.....could the Sonos: One be better? Maybe, but I'm not risking it at this point.
Google uses your information as a seperate revenue source
Home doesn’t work with Apple Music
Home doesn’t work with podcast app
Home doesn’t work with AirPlay and probably won’t ever work with Airplay 2
The Max is too big (and ugly) for many of the places people put HomePods
The Max doesn’t have 360 sound
The Max won’t get AirPlay 2 Control
Google uses your information as a seperate revenue source
Home doesn’t work with Apple Music
Home doesn’t work with podcast app
Home doesn’t work with AirPlay and probably won’t ever work with Airplay 2
The Max is too big (and ugly) for many of the places people put HomePods
The Max doesn’t have 360 sound
The Max won’t get AirPlay 2 Control
I have no doubt people will be by here to tell you why that it's a good thing. I'm not one of those those people.Yeah not sure what they were thinking. Bluetooth should’ve been included , and that alone stops me from buying it.
HomePod doesn't really have 360 degree sound either unless you have it on a table in the middle of a room. You know, having the rear of such a thing facing the wall defeats the purpose which is why the Max with more watts and power facing forward makes a bit more sense.