I have a question for everyone:
If we are all for competition (which I'd assume the smart ones are), why is it that most of you clamor for Apple and iOS to be more like Google, Android and other Android handset makers? What is the point in making the two more like each other?
Some people prefer customization and huge screens (which have pros and cons).
Others prefer simplicity, efficiency and smaller screens (which have pros and cons).
This is why both OSes exist and why these smartphone makers make the phones they do the way they do. Each has its own strategy and I prefer they keep them separate.
Obviously both are doing well, selling 10s of millions of devices each year. As a consumer base, lets try to keep our fickleness to a minimum - the iPhone 5 was arguably the biggest single upgrade in the history of iPhones. iOS 6 may have been somewhat disappointing, but they are two separate releases.
With a new design (thinner, lighter, larger screen - which has the same dimensions as the Razr HD btw), more than double the CPU speed, double he graphics power, same PPI - but new screen tech gives the 5 the best mobile display as far as color reproduction in the biz, power-efficient LTE, all with the same 10+ hour battery life (which is tops in the industry - albeit in a much smaller form than competition) - the iPhone 5 is every bit a competitor to the Galaxy S3, One X, Lumia 920, etc. They are all flagship phones - and all great in their own rite....its up to the consumer to decide which approach is right for HIM/HER - not for everyone else.
So before you say "all my friends have Android so it must be better" - remember, your circle of friends represents a terribly small sample of the larger public - and generally we align ourselves with friends who think similarly to ourselves.