Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Depends on how critical they were. Rules usually don't apply to the "rainmakers" in any org.
“The graveyards of Europe are filled with indispensable people.”

That’s what my new boss, a Belgian, told me the day I met him after first saying “I hear amazing things about you. You’re considered indispensable around here,” fooling me into thinking I was being paid a compliment.

Little did I know that that meeting would be the start of the inexorable process that led me not only to leave AMD’s CPU design team, but to switch careers entirely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist and ctucci
Some of the Apple engineers bringing work from home up on Twitter are workaholics that are certainly putting more then 8 hours a day in.

I used to like going into the engineering lab on the weekends when nobody was there and crank up the original Van Halen while I worked. I would get more done then vs during regular work hours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist
The comments on here crack me up. It’s clear that most of the people on here are either older (might I even say boomers) or they don’t work in an IT/software field. The software company I work for has basically announced the same model as Apple, and 90-95% of the company DO NOT want to come back to the office. We’ve already lost one employee this week and many more are looking for other jobs.

comments like “get over it, get back to the office” are short sited. If a company is able to successfully perform while the majority of their employees work from home, then why force people to come back. The “because that’s how we’ve always done it” argument is bad for business. As an employee, why would I want to spent thousands in gas a year, hours a week in traffic, and see my coworkers more than my family.

The work world is evolving and there are TONS of jobs right now that will pay really well and allow you to work from anyway. This isnt about being spoiled, but a realization that an old school model of in office work is both limiting and inefficient. Apple might be a “prestigious” job, but at the end of the day for your average developer at the company, the pay and benefits are a dime a dozen. If you’re good enough to work at Apple, you’re not going to have any trouble finding remote work.

in the end, this policy will hurt Apple, and any other company not willing to be flexible and listen to their employees. We live in a borderless job market now, and employee’s have more power/options than ever before.
Timmy just doesn't know what to do with an empty $5 billion spaceship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcmoney10
You seem to think Apple is a burger joint of some sort. When you're hiring talented and scarce labor, the power relationship goes the other way.

30% of basecamp’s workforce quit in response to the founders’ new policy on not discussing politics at work. Today, they have found replacements for those positions and are doing better than ever.

Either way, the first people I would let go at a company are those who are a threat to corporate culture, no matter how good they are (eg: Scott Forstall). It will also send a strong message that no one is truly indispensable, and not to overestimate their worth.

Apple will survive their departure.
 
You seem to think Apple is a burger joint of some sort. When you're hiring talented and scarce labor, the power relationship goes the other way.
Lots of “old men yelling at clouds” around here. Talents gunna go where the best pay and benefits are. If you’re offered a job at both Apple and Twitter, and you value work from home…where you gunna work ?
 
You can’t believe that, right? Do you work for Foxconn? People shouldn’t have to worry about losing their job just to be safe.
Why are the goalposts being moved? Foxconn? Being safe? At some point in the future this pandemic will be in the taillights. If an employer requires one to be in the office, and you don’t want to, what are your options?

Things are going to shake out on a case by case basis. You may be lucky and be able to ask for your schedule and have it granted. Others may not be so lucky.

Some believe if they quit, a multi-billion company will go down the tubes. Not the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raist3001
Lots of “old men yelling at clouds” around here. Talents gunna go where the best pay and benefits are. If you’re offered a job at both Apple and Twitter, and you value work from home…where you gunna work ?

And yet Apple pays engineers less than other companies in the valley. So maybe it isn’t about pay and benefits.
 
Why are the goalposts being moved? Foxconn? Being safe? At some point in the future this pandemic will be in the taillights. If an employer requires one to be in the office, and you don’t want to, what are your options?
1. Fall in line
2. Play the victim and use social media as a tool against the employer hoping they cave to irrational pressure
3. Start telling everyone you know how much Apple mistreated you

I say option 2 is already in full use
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kerr
“The graveyards of Europe are filled with indispensable people.”

That’s what my new boss, a Belgian, told me the day I met him after first saying “I hear amazing things about you. You’re considered indispensable around here,” fooling me into thinking I was being paid a compliment.

Little did I know that that meeting would be the start of the inexorable process that led me not only to leave AMD’s CPU design team, but to switch careers entirely.
I get it, but it -can- matter in other organizations. And indispensable is different than rainmaker. The former is an approbation. The latter is a functional reality.
 
3. Quit telling everyone you know how much Apple mistreated you

Comma lives matter.

Quit telling everyone you know how much Apple mistreated you.

Quit, telling everyone you know how much Apple mistreated you.

Quit, telling everyone, "you know how much Apple mistreated you."
 
  • Love
Reactions: kerr
1. Fall in line
2. Play the victim and use social media as a tool against the employer hoping they cave to irrational pressure
3. Quit telling everyone you know how much Apple mistreated you

I say option 2 is already in full use
Some of the entitlement displayed in these threads is astounding. If I worked for a company that:
1. Supported me through the pandemic
2. Gave some form of extra remuneration to help me through it
3. Didn’t fire me
4. Gave me a raise/bonus as if nothing has happened
5. I’m basically whole in June 2021 while plenty of people had terrible circumstances…

I would be like: “what do you want me to do?” Not making the employer out to be the bad guy.
 
Bunch of whiners. Covid is in the rear view mirror and anyone not willing to come back to the workplace as defined by their employer should be terminated. There's plenty of people willing to work for apple out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Act3
Some of the entitlement displayed in these threads is astounding. If I worked for a company that:
1. Supported me through the pandemic
2. Gave some form of extra remuneration to help me through it
3. Didn’t fire me
4. Gave me a raise/bonus as if nothing has happened
5. I’m basically whole in June 2021 while plenty of people had terrible circumstances…

I would be like: “what do you want me to do?” Not making the employer out to be the bad guy.
Absolutely. Apple went above and beyond and they have been very reasonable with their new return policy. I would be very thankful for an employer like that.
 
Some of the entitlement displayed in these threads is astounding. If I worked for a company that:
1. Supported me through the pandemic
2. Gave some form of extra remuneration to help me through it
3. Didn’t fire me
4. Gave me a raise/bonus as if nothing has happened
5. I’m basically whole in June 2021 while plenty of people had terrible circumstances…

I would be like: “what do you want me to do?” Not making the employer out to be the bad guy.
Absolutely get that point. But TBH, the letter was effusive with praise for Apple overall - sure, some of the requests were a bit over the line coming from staff. But you open negotiations with the big ask, then work on the deal, -if- you can get one at all. But if Apple said "Nope, my way or Highway", then there's the answer. But it won't hurt to ask...
 
Some of the entitlement displayed in these threads is astounding. If I worked for a company that:
1. Supported me through the pandemic
2. Gave some form of extra remuneration to help me through it
3. Didn’t fire me
4. Gave me a raise/bonus as if nothing has happened
5. I’m basically whole in June 2021 while plenty of people had terrible circumstances…

I would be like: “what do you want me to do?” Not making the employer out to be the bad guy.
Apple is one of the most profitable companies in the world. They'd be nothing without these very employees. Stop defending corporations over real people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist
Absolutely get that point. But TBH, the letter was effusive with praise for Apple overall - sure, some of the requests were a bit over the line coming from staff. But you open negotiations with the big ask, then work on the deal, -if- you can get one at all. But if Apple said "Nope, my way or Highway", then there's the answer. But it won't hurt to ask...

Problem was that it seemed they deliberately leaked the letter to theverge. Perhaps to generate an uproar to pressure Apple into capitulating.

This isn’t the tone of someone with a “it won’t hurt to ask” mentality. It’s akin to someone banging their fists on the table and going “my way or the highway”. To their boss.

No matter how magnanimous I may be, if I as the boss were to give in to their demands here and now, what sort of example would I be setting and what sort of message would I be sending? That it’s okay to sidestep proper channels and use this sort of pressure tactics to get their way?

I will never be able to hold my head up high in front of all the other employees ever again.

Apple can’t stop people from continuing to pull this exact same tactic in the future, but they can send a very strong message that it will not have the desired outcome they are hoping for.

Apple is one of the most profitable companies in the world. They'd be nothing without these very employees. Stop defending corporations over real people.

Then perhaps we should be that to the test. If these people are as valuable and indispensable and you make them out to be, they would have no problems looking for a better job elsewhere and Apple would be in big trouble from the exodus of talent.

You all should be clapping and cheering.
 
Problem was that it seemed they deliberately leaked the letter to theverge. Perhaps to generate an uproar to pressure Apple into capitulating.

This isn’t the tone of someone with a “it won’t hurt to ask” mentality. It’s akin to someone banging their fists on the table and going “my way or the highway”. To their boss.

No matter how magnanimous I may be, if I as the boss were to give in to their demands here and now, what sort of example would I be setting and what sort of message would I be sending? That it’s okay to sidestep proper channels and use this sort of pressure tactics to get their way?

I will never be able to hold my head up high in front of all the other employees ever again.

Apple can’t stop people from continuing to pull this exact same tactic in the future, but they can send a very strong message that it will not have the desired outcome they are hoping for.
Excellent point. I agree. It would have been much better to quietly go through proper channels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abazigal
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.