Apparently the company thinks it *is* necessary.What is the purpose of having employees attend in person if it isn't necessary?
Apparently the company thinks it *is* necessary.What is the purpose of having employees attend in person if it isn't necessary?
I may have learned math and logic differently than you, so hoping you can enlighten me on your point here. I want to make sure I’m understanding you correctly.The environmental impact request is stupid. As if those same people aren’t leaving their house and driving other places?
Power. It's all about maintaining power and control over others.What is the purpose of having employees attend in person if it isn't necessary?
Probably just to justify managers’ jobs. I have worked at places where they treat the employees like children and management will micromanage every aspect of their dealings even to the point of what TV station should be on in the break room.What is the purpose of having employees attend in person if it isn't necessary?
No one will answer this.What is the purpose of having employees attend in person if it isn't necessary?
Do you understand how Apple Park works? They have plenty of fresh air coming in and their HVAC is some of the best in the world.Nobody wants to breath in recirculated artificial air 8 hours a day... .
Apparently because innovation takes place when you are by a water cooler and that just doesn't work remotely?What is the purpose of having employees attend in person if it isn't necessary?
No. People get paid to do work, not go to it. Try just showing up and watching a movie.
"I came to work boss, now pay me!"
Sorry, but things are changing. More and more businesses are starting to offer 100% remote work. I can actually apply for more jobs in other states and I was not able to before. The fact that Apple is even bringing up a hybrid approach means things are changing. Why is it such a big deal to write a letter stating you are better working at home?There is a line of people who would beat down the doors to work at Apple if these people don’t want to. They knew what the work culture was when they signed up; it isn’t like the intensity of work required is a secret. It is like a PA having their parents write a note to try to get out of working early mornings and late nights doing this like copying sides and getting coffee. Get over yourself, do the work required and one day you will be in a position where you call the shots. That is how work works. No one wants to work in the office overnight on occasion but that is life sometimes. Otherwise, quit and find a job that panders to your needs above anything else.
If your work tasks do not really require you to be at the office, then you should of course be allowed to work from home. But as others has pointed out, it's about control. If you ask your boss this question, you will probably never get a good answer. Just "that is our policy". And then you are expeced to follow it and shut up.What is the purpose of having employees attend in person if it isn't necessary?
It’s a well-known fact that prehistoric man got the idea for both fire and the wheel at the stonewatercooler.Apparently because innovation takes place when you are by a water cooler and that just doesn't work remotely?
Or what if he went to get a Coke instead? That would have changed everything.So M1 only came into existence by two random software developers at a water cooler? Its just a CHANCE occurrence? What if Fred hadn't gone to the water cooler at that specific second of that specific day. No M1?
I haven't been sick in well over a year since we worked from home. I really wish people would have that attitude - "feel sick, stay home".We are no longer in an epidemic situation, by definition, and there are effective vaccines and effective treatments. At this point, Covid is another type off dangerous “flu” that these same employees and companies ignored every year other than “we recommend flu shots.”
For the age group working at Apple, exposure and infection is not any more serious than the flu. And one hopes that people will take the adage of “feel sick, call in sick” more seriously moving forward.
Um, the whole point is that everyone needs to be protected, not just Apple employees.We are no longer in an epidemic situation, by definition, and there are effective vaccines and effective treatments. At this point, Covid is another type off dangerous “flu” that these same employees and companies ignored every year other than “we recommend flu shots.”
For the age group working at Apple, exposure and infection is not any more serious than the flu. And one hopes that people will take the adage of “feel sick, call in sick” more seriously moving forward.
Welcome back to profits over people. Give me a break. The most profitable company on Earth, who goes around calling themselves a 'startup' because they are so flexible, can adapt.Now, all Apple is asking for 3 days in the office starting in September…
The employees are whining that they want to be allowed to work entirely remote if they desire. And, their emotional argument is inappropriately co-opting inclusion and diversity to further their aim. Um, unless you were hired to be remote, you worked in the office before COVID-19. It's time to go back to the mothership, babies!
Welcome to the new Millennial / Gen-Z work ethic Apple!
Not to mention that Blarg required Grog to carve out a presentation on a cave wall on exactly how he would create the wheel and fire that actually took longer to do than creating the wheel and fire themselves.It’s a well-known fact that prehistoric man got the idea for both fire and the wheel at the stonewatercooler.
it simply wasn’t possible for them to have discovered and identified that need any other way.
Luckily, Blarg had scheduled a recurring 1-on-1 with Grog to “check-in” on project progress throughout development.
It wasn’t sufficient for Grog to produce the wheel and fire for Blarg by showing it to them upon completion, Blarg needed to see the work in process.
Also, Blarg required Grog to work on them in a specific cave, even though that particular cave had no intrinsic value to the project…Grog’s tools were portable.
…but Grog knew that he had to be seen as a “hustler”, because Blarg wouldn’t evaluate his performance in his performance, but rather on his proximity/visibility.
…and that setup is the only path to success no matter what the project, and the universal basis for all workflows in use today. I certainly see no reason to ever change it.
That because that number includes Apple Store Employees and Customer support. People working at the California mothership are making 6 figures easy.Since Apple's median employee pay is $57,783, I doubt many of those you are referring to were among the signatories of this letter.
Or what if he went to get a Coke instead? That would have changed everything.
"Companies are not democracies, but the employees writing these letters sure seem to think Apple is one. It’s not, and if it were, the company would sink in a snap. Apple’s new “three days on site” policy wasn’t a request for comments — it was a decision"
Oh not at all, there's several commenting who agree with you. I'm among them. Even the people who didn't want to work from home initially now say "not going back unless directed to". And our group puts in more actual productive time this way.Sounds like I am the only one that sides with the employees here. Pretty much everyone I know (in London - both small companies and huge corporations) has been told they can work from home from now on, and it seems many tech companies are doing the same over the pond. Asking people to come back in 3 days a week from March seems to be going against the trend. At least in my opinion anyway. Personally I was far more productive at home and ended up working many more hours than when in the office. It was a win win for both employee and employer. But it seems my take is not very popular here! I guess Apple is the only one that has forked out for a building that holds 30,000 people. Most other companies will see this as an opportunity to save on rent/office space. Apple can't do that.