Hope you didn't buy at 695...![]()
If he bought at $695, he would be even more glad to have sold at $700
Hope you didn't buy at 695...![]()
On the way up or on the way down?
They did it to themselves. For the longest time i blamed investors for not understanding apple. But now i see that Apple has been dismissive of market trends regarding screen size. It is insulting to loyal customers, and they're paying for it with lost revenue. Such a simple and obvious thing to miss, it makes you think apple is headed by morons.
Eventually Motorola will dominate smartphones, 2014 is their year. In the short terms it's Samsung, medium term HTC. Apple needs to switch into crisis mode badly and give us something great.
Wait, what did I say?
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/16981496/
Written back in March and was ridiculed. Anyone else want me to peer into my crystal ball again?
Yeah, Tim Cook should totally do whatever you say.The biggest enemy of Apple is not Google but itself. Most of its profits come from iPhone but they refuse to give people different sizing options and so people like me have pre-ordered the Galaxy S4 because it has a 5" screen compared to my puny iPhones 5's 4" screen.
Why can't Apple just do a 4",4.5", and 5" screens? Give people options, small screen phones are so 2007. Also, redesign iOS, its so boring now.
Not sure if Ive is ready for it, but I do think he needs to start being more "front facing". It would be nice if he started participating in keynotes. Maybe start him off doing segments, until it gets to the point where he is opening and closing the keynotes. I understand peoples fear to speak in front of live audiences, but it is something you get use to the more you do.
Finally, someone with some knowledge on here, who understands the importance of long-term and isn't panicking for these common short term problems.
They have 130b or whatever in cash, and the stock IS undervalued. That's just good business. I'm not sure what my stock portfolio has to do with it.
Don't you think?Yeah, Tim Cook should totally do whatever you say.![]()
Apple's net value or enterprise value is a little over 385 billion not above, with inflated value on stock market, meaning market capitalization, it is today undervalued since it has a 1.04 over enterprise value and in market trading that is very low for a company like Apple.
You all can kiss innovative OSX development good bye. When a company's stock plummets like this they always pump their resources into their big revenue generators... iOS
Get your macs while they still make 'em.![]()
The policy of Steve being the one and only spokesperson for Apple doesn't work anymore now that he's gone. They may need to become a bit like other companies now that his force of personality is no longer here. So if Businessweek or Engadget is hosting a design conference in San Francisco let Jony Ive speak at it. Or if its a different event (like the allthingsd mobile conference this week) let one of the SVPs give an interview there. So far all we've had this year was Tim Cook at Goldman Sachs (stock dropped that day) and comments from Phil Schiller right before the S4 launch (some that turned out to be false - like the S4 shipping with a year old OS). That isn't going to cut it.I think their policy is the same as its always been with one exception. There is no longer a relatively steady stream of quips from Steve.
Regardless of your opinion of how well it went over, he consistently projected power and a sharp wit when chiming in on a current hot-button issue, or when his responses to customer emails were published.
How many times since his passing would he have made a snappy remark to subtly put the competition in their place? These are all missed opportunities, that kind of stuff resonated with the public and it made a difference.
Apple hasn't announced a single revenue drop, year over year, in a very long time... what revenue losses are you talking about? I do think the option of a larger screen size would boost revenue, but that is potential revenue. You can't lose revenue you don't yet have.
the thing that doesn't make sense is that Cirrus Logic said that there decline was due to a large customer reducing orders for an old part and switching to a new part. All of the news outlets picked up on the first part of the statement
Now I don't know if the news outlets/analysts have information that shows that there was a decline in the total number of parts orders (eg 1 million old parts vs 500,000 new parts). Perhaps, perhaps not. Well see next Tuesday as apple sets to deliver there numbers for q2 and estimates for q3.
Wait, what did I say?
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/16981496/
Written back in March and was ridiculed. Anyone else want me to peer into my crystal ball again?
It's languishing along with the New iPod Classic in the Land Of Who Cares. Updating a low-volume niche product line is not going to boost Apple's stock price.Where is the New Mac Pro?
So there are all these new, innovative and exciting products on the roadmap that Steve left but neither Cook nor any of the other SVPs know how to bring them to market? And yet this is the same executive team Steve built (minus Forstall) and Cook is the one he recommended to be CEO?Not at all - my contention is that Tim Cook can not EXECUTE a roadmap.
I said from day one that Tim Cook is no replacement for Steve Jobs. Apart from kissing China's backside, I haven't seen him doing anything.
Yeah, taking half-baked advice from random people in the internet has always been a proven strategy for Apple.Don't you think?
Good thing I have all my money tied up in Bitcoins!