They did the whole work and included the majority of an iPad and leaf out this stupidly simple opportunity.
Kind of sucks
Kind of sucks
There would be a lag. This is intended as a primary display.From what we learned so far, Apple missed some opportunity by not including WiFi/BT:
Think of this:
Sidecar: connecting the external display just by click and not by cable
We can be glad that the display itself is fully laminated given the old tech of the LCD itselfLiterally a device with many wasted components.
Apple's Studio Display contains 64GB of onboard storage, but only 2GB are actually used by the display, a developer has discovered.
![]()
As highlighted by developer "Khaos Tian" on Twitter, the Studio Display only uses 2GB of its 64GB of internal NAND storage. Some free space is likely needed for firmware updates, but the 62GB of unused space is seemingly otherwise useless at the current time. Apple has not confirmed the quantity of the Studio Display's internal storage in its technical specifications.
The discovery may be unsurprising given that the Studio Display contains an A13 Bionic chip. The A13 Bionic was introduced with the iPhone 11 lineup in 2019, before being offered in the second-generation iPhone SE and the ninth-generation iPad. None of these devices have ever been available in any storage configurations below 64GB, which may suggest that smaller quantities of NAND storage are incompatible with the A13's storage controller.
Economies of scale may also be responsible, with production costs for pairing the A13 with a smaller amount of storage potentially costing more than the same 64GB system currently used in the iPhone 11 that is still on sale and the ninth-generation iPad.
The finding means that, overall, the Studio Display contains the exact same 2.65GHz A13 Bionic chip, 12MP Ultra Wide front-facing camera setup with Center Stage, and 64GB base configuration of storage as the ninth-generation iPad. It is also now clear that the Studio Display has better specifications than the second-generation Apple TV 4K, which sports an A12 Bionic chip and a base storage configuration of just 32GB.
Last week, it emerged that the Studio Display runs the full version of iOS 15.4, with the exact same build used by the iPhone and iPad, meaning that updates to the display's functionality will come as part of iOS updates.
Article Link: Apple Studio Display Contains 64GB of Storage, But Only 2GB Used
In my setup with m1 12.9“ the lag is minimal to non-existent depending on my wifi-status in daily business.There would be a lag. This is intended as a primary display.
It’s more likely that Apple wanted to keep development costs down. They are using the logic board of an outgoing iPhone model, Thunderbolt 3 instead of 4, and using a slightly updated version of a 5 year old LG panel.They did the whole work and included the majority of an iPad and leaf out this stupidly simple opportunity.
Kind of sucks
Most high-end displays need some sort of processor for image and audio processing/scaling/rate conversion, onscreen menus, etc. irrespective of what obvious "smart" features they may have.It’s getting to where it’s almost impossible to hide just how arbitrary Apple’s limits are when imposed upon hardware by software. This thing could’ve been an Apple TV (without the need for a display).
I think the argument is that using these existing A13 parts, with existing supply chain, is cheaper than engineering any new parts, no matter the complexity of the chips used. So what if they’re leaving additional processing power on the table?It’s getting to where it’s almost impossible to hide just how arbitrary Apple’s limits are when imposed upon hardware by software. This thing could’ve been an Apple TV (without the need for a display).
This thing seems stupidly over-engineered and then intentionally crippled. Or maybe this isn’t engineering. Maybe it’s laziness/convenience and price gouging, because they have all these over-featured parts to use instead of something focused, less complicated, and less expensive.
So you're saying Apple just added 64GB of storage to make the Studio Display more expensive? 🤔It’s getting to where it’s almost impossible to hide just how arbitrary Apple’s limits are when imposed upon hardware by software. This thing could’ve been an Apple TV (without the need for a display).
This thing seems stupidly over-engineered and then intentionally crippled. Or maybe this isn’t engineering. Maybe it’s laziness/convenience and price gouging, because they have all these over-featured parts to use instead of something focused, less complicated, and less expensive.
Don't get overly excited... said the same thing when M1 Ipad Pro came out with desktop-type specs... haven't really seen any attempt to take full advantage of that capability yet...sounds like surprises are coming!I guess we'll hear more about these hidden capabilities at WWDC!
Hmm.It’s more likely that Apple wanted to keep development costs down. They are using the logic board of an outgoing iPhone model, Thunderbolt 3 instead of 4, and using a slightly updated version of a 5 year old LG panel.
Another possibility is that this started out as an M1 or M1 Pro iMac but Apple decided to go in a different direction with the Mac Studio.
Oh okay. Only since 2019. Is that recent to you?Only recently.
That's actually an interesting idea. I have wondered why Apple hasn't yet automatically included ATV in their "expensive" monitors. I mean Samsung sells a smart monitor for a little over $300. I mean, really, for $1500 is that too much to ask?When I plug my iPad Pro into the Studio Displays Thunderbolt port, it powers the iPad and videos can run in full screen mode on the Studio Display with the iPad screen locked (or in "clamshell" mode with it closed over the magic keyboard). With its great built-in speakers, I have discovered this is like I also have a good 27" 5k television (but no HDR). Maybe they could slap tvOS on there and have a special mode for that. This display does not have a power button, like the Apple TV. Edit: well, it also lacks bluetooth and wifi built in, as far as we know. Would need a dongle I suppose to make this work.