A day of my time is worth much more than $50. Will that cover your happy meal shift?
LOL @ you. Whatever makes you feel warm & fuzzy inside.
A day of my time is worth much more than $50. Will that cover your happy meal shift?
Apple providing a way to delete the update data is not unreasonable to desire.
Filling a lawsuit over it is.
And when you've exhausted all the possible avenues with communicating with Apple and have got no-where, the only option is the small claims court.
First of all it is "lose" performance. I don't think you mean the iphone becomes less tight. That is loose.
Secondly, the user can choose either a minor performance hit or less space. Moreover any performance loss can be adjusted by turning off some features in ios 7.
And the whining of performance is likely overblown. I have ios 7 on an ipad 3. Supposedly not optimal for the new ios. Yet it is fine.
Or sell the device and buy something else.
Does the device work? Is it usable? I don't think some temporary loss of storage is meaningful. If you need more storage delete some stuff you never use or move it to a computer. I don't think its a moral issue equivalent to the use of chemical weapons on children. And read the EULA I quoted above. It is legal.
Obviously, these idiots didn't read this in the terms of use. It's under 1. General
You keep posting from the EULA. What EXACTLY therein do you believe is controlling? Do you believe that consumers have agreed to accept any and all future changes to the iOS, including those that are known to adversely affect a specific iOS device, or do you simply believe that consumers have waived any and all rights to redress?
No where does it say in what you have quoted that users "Must" download any updates made available by apples. Nor does it say anything about Apple making a certain amount of storage on a users device unavailable.
I wouldnt be so quick to call people idiots for not reading in future![]()
And when you've exhausted all the possible avenues with communicating with Apple and have got no-where, the only option is the small claims court.
Wrong! Android gives you the option. Exactly the same for Microsoft, I can turn the updates off too.![]()
Capped plans don't exist anymore in the US? Last time I compared, North America as a whole was keen on high-speeds low caps, and this was a special concern for cable internet. Isn't it the case anymore? FTR I do consider 100GB+ technically as a cap, and a rather low one.
That's EXACTLY the point. That may be the case in the US, but the US is not the majority of the Apple market. These HUGE Apple downloads were bad enough when you had a choice now they are just downright criminal. In many countries in Europe/Asia/Australia you get a data cap of just a few gig for the month and in terms of third world countries forget it! Apple has become simply elitist. They may well live to regret the way they are treating emerging markets now, they might have small data caps, but they also have VERY long memories
iOS7 isn't the first iOS update to automatically download, why haven't people complained before? Its AMAZING how something that is meant to be convenient for everybody is causing a small minority problems because they can't get over just upgrading like the rest of the world.
1) Update or 2) Sell it and buy a larger capacity iPhone (there's dozens of devices for sale on iOS 6) or 3) Sell it and try a different platform (probably WP8).
Oh, that's right. Thanks for reminding me that Samsung has changed Android so much on their phones that it's unrecognizable. I was, of course, showing you a screenshot of a Google Nexus device, where this behavior most certainly is the default and is most certainly not given as an option. Don't post your Samsung settings as the norm, they most certainly are not, even from one Samsung device to the other.
iOS users should be able to downgrade to iOS 6.0, and keep it as long as they want.
All of these iOS devices have a limited lifespan anyway. Their batteries cannot be replaced under normal circumstances, so they will eventually die out in a couple of years.
Total fanboy reaction. The only options are give in to apple and be forced to update, or sell the phone just to get back wasted space.
Calm down!
Ive got a Nexus 7 and when an update is available, it shows in the notification area as per your screenshot.
1) It dosent however download anything without me allowing it
2 It dosent take up any space on my device if I dont allow the update
As such, its pretty poor trying to compare how Android does things and how ios does things.![]()
If he's got a 16GB iDevice he's also just lost over 20% of the free storage space.
Except in the terms of service, it plainly states apple will use that space for updates and the like as they see fit...
I know Vista was not free and it did not automatically download in the background. It's a hypothetical.
Exactly. You and many others preferred it, many others did not. That means that different people have different opinions on it. Which was my point. Not that everyone has the same view on it.
Here in Australia at least he would potentially have a case. The device has had it's storage capacity significantly reduced for something he did not consent for. To summerise parts of the Australian Consumer Law Act, especially the statute referring to "fit for purpose":
Businesses that sell goods guarantee that those goods:
- are of acceptable quality - the goods must be safe, lasting, have no faults, look acceptable and do all the things someone would normally expect them to do
- are fit for any purpose that the consumer made known to the business before buying (either expressly or by implication), or the purpose for which the business said it would be fit for
- have been accurately described
- match any sample or demonstration model
come with undisturbed possession, so no one has the right to take the goods away from or to prevent the consumer from using them
Dramatically reducing the storage captivity without the consent of the end user could fall under a number of these, in Australia at least. It's a fallacy to say that the plaintiff has zero case. These type of consumer law suits, more commonly in the form of a class action crop up all the time. I'm certain that similar statutes apply in the US.
That's irrelevant. The consumer already paid for the device. They are entitled to keep and continue using the device that they paid for without it being significantly altered by the OEM with no consent from the user. Again, there's laws in Australia to stop exactly this sort of thing from happening.
If a BMW rep came down to my garage and replaced my fuel tank with a smaller capacity one, without my consent, would you say that the correct remedy would be for me would be to sell my BMW and buy a Merc, and there should be no ramifications for BMW?
I can't think of a single developed country in the world with even the most rudimentary consumer laws where this would be legal.
In my country, this would most definitely be illegal.